Tank Tank Or Tank Tank Tank?

Discussion in 'Lakers Discussion' started by LaVarBallsDad, Jan 21, 2017.

?

To Tank Or Not To Tank?

  1. Tank.

    39 vote(s)
    61.9%
  2. Don't tank.

    16 vote(s)
    25.4%
  3. Fine with either outcome.

    8 vote(s)
    12.7%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Khmrp

    Khmrp - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2016
    Messages:
    12,135
    Likes Received:
    13,854
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Just peronal bias I guess, i see fultz as a more athletic bigger dame, Ball as a bigger ver of cp3
     
  2. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Tatum also declares for the draft officially.

    He really grew on me as the season progressed. Right now he's my #3 even though the Lakers are seemingly good at the forward spot. He's a natural scorer and as the season went on was a better defender. He found ways to impact the game other than scoring the ball which was a big fear for me. I have him over Josh Jackson because of perceived off-the-court issues with Jackson.
     
    DOAKLEY8 likes this.
  3. Khmrp

    Khmrp - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2016
    Messages:
    12,135
    Likes Received:
    13,854
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I wouldnt be to sad to see ball go #1 if we stay at #2. Im sure both will be good in their own way
     
  4. Khmrp

    Khmrp - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2016
    Messages:
    12,135
    Likes Received:
    13,854
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    If youre not from the future theres no way you can make absolute comments like this
     
    John3:16 likes this.
  5. LTLakerFan

    LTLakerFan - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    36,599
    Likes Received:
    60,830
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    So Cal
    Offline
    Just meaning DAR's shot from a slightly shorter frame doesn't come off from much higher than his forehead either. He's been in the league two years to adjust now. Give Ball at least a year to adjust or sooner and his shot can become quicker while still being accurate too. They both can create space with the juking moves and step or jump backs. Ball is supposed to be a little more athletic. Ball's not shoot first anyway but leave him alone or he creates a gap, like Russell, look out.
     
  6. trodgers

    trodgers Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    12,159
    Likes Received:
    18,507
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Professor of Humanities
    Location:
    Orlando
    Offline
    Ball loads up way lower than Russell though. Like 6-12 inches lower. That's a huge difference.
     
  7. Daniel Beltz

    Daniel Beltz - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2014
    Messages:
    100
    Likes Received:
    192
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Offline
    Trade Randle, have Tatum and Ingram play the 3/4. Start Zubac at center long term. I really like Randle but if we could trade Randle and JC for a better guard to match with DLo.
     
  8. DOAKLEY8

    DOAKLEY8 - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2017
    Messages:
    135
    Likes Received:
    214
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Offline
    Tatum has moved up on me..still think if the Lakers land 3rd..passing on Jackon's upside and athleticism is going to be tough for Magic to pass on.
     
  9. Savory Griddles

    Savory Griddles Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Messages:
    9,152
    Likes Received:
    22,367
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Just thinking outside the box here. Let's say the PG-13 deal is a no-go and we keep the pick, but it's at #3. Would you guys draft Jackson to play next to Ingram at the forward spots and then possibly trade Randle to the C Bags for Smart? I'm not sure the C Bags do it, but they need help in the bigs department and Smart could be a great fit next to Russell.
     
  10. DOAKLEY8

    DOAKLEY8 - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2017
    Messages:
    135
    Likes Received:
    214
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Offline
    I wouldn't trade Randle for Smart...no
     
    alam1108 likes this.
  11. LTLakerFan

    LTLakerFan - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    36,599
    Likes Received:
    60,830
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    So Cal
    Offline
    I would think not too hard of a thing to raise that up 6 inches or maybe higher over time while not having him mess with the weird angle. Plus he's more athletic right? Allegedly. Should be able to create space as well as Russell not too long development wise from now with his good handles.
     
    trodgers likes this.
  12. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Dear God no.
     
  13. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Keep getting younger... I'm not positive Tatum will be better than Randle and I'm not sure I want to dial the clock backwards to find out. I'll take Tatum and figure out the rotation later, but I'm not eager to jettison a kid we know for a kid we don't know.
     
    wallangong likes this.
  14. tada

    tada - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2014
    Messages:
    4,467
    Likes Received:
    8,535
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Trading Randle would mean losing physicality in the paint. All we'd have left with is finesse. As much as I like Russell and Ingram, I don't like that balance.
     
    LTLakerFan likes this.
  15. wallangong

    wallangong - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    1,627
    Likes Received:
    4,914
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    agreed. i actually prefer Jackson at #3, but either way, I don't automatically move Randle after taking anyone at that position. It's another 19-20 year old that will need development, so I only trade Randle if it's for an all-star caliber player.
     
    therealdeal and LTLakerFan like this.
  16. trodgers

    trodgers Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    12,159
    Likes Received:
    18,507
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Professor of Humanities
    Location:
    Orlando
    Offline
    I don't know. Russell might be more crafty than Ball is athletic.
     
  17. KRL

    KRL - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2016
    Messages:
    1,369
    Likes Received:
    1,190
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    One dark horse I love in FA to play center for us is ..... Milsap and to a lesser extent Ibaka
     
    trodgers likes this.
  18. lakerfan2

    lakerfan2 - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2014
    Messages:
    5,220
    Likes Received:
    10,105
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Simi Valley
    Offline
    Milsap is god old and is coming off an injury.

    Ibaka is maybe 60% of the player he used to be, but would still be overpaid.

    No thanks.
     
  19. LTLakerFan

    LTLakerFan - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    36,599
    Likes Received:
    60,830
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    So Cal
    Offline
    Barring some development where either or both move we already have Moz and Black coming off the bench next year.
     
  20. KRL

    KRL - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2016
    Messages:
    1,369
    Likes Received:
    1,190
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Milsap is 31 and has avg 75 games a yr
     
    trodgers likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page