Official 2016 Free Agency Thread

Discussion in 'Lakers Discussion' started by LaVarBallsDad, Nov 16, 2015.

  1. LaVarBallsDad

    LaVarBallsDad - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    16,172
    Likes Received:
    31,056
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    A top 3 pick would certainly help..adding another asset and probably packaging a young player could net you an impact player. Lou is another asset on a contract friendly deal that could be tossed in as well...
     
    therealdeal likes this.
  2. Savory Griddles

    Savory Griddles Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Messages:
    9,169
    Likes Received:
    22,447
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I'll be honest, I'd trade one of Randle or Russell as well if it could land us another piece.
     
  3. Lakers2015

    Lakers2015 - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2015
    Messages:
    3,634
    Likes Received:
    6,103
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    If we're trading Russell or Randle we better be getting more than just a piece. It better be a spectacular piece as in a superstar.
     
  4. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    See my thing is both those guys look like potential cornerstones so if you want them, then I want an unreasonable package in return. I'm not sure I'd trade the pick AND Russell or the pick AND Randle... That's a LOT of potential right there. I'm not sure I do that...

    My dream trade would be Lou/Pick/Nick Young (salary dump)/ maybe Nance Jr. for Butler. If we need to throw in another pick (I know Laker fans hate that idea), I'm for it.

    Get me Butler while keeping Randle/Russell and I'll start to believe in Mitch's magic wand again. If you can pull that off, now you're talking about a team with Butler, Randle, and Russell... and room to add two max deals AND more on top of that. THAT is something you can take to Durant and make him consider. Anything less than that and the big time FAs aren't going to be taking LA seriously.
     
  5. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    29,258
    Likes Received:
    79,346
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    anyone is gone at the right price for me. I like the three (four?) young guys, but there are certainly trade offers to which I'm listening that involve them. once we find out if we have a pick, I might devote some mental energy to discussing scenarios. until then, I'm not counting chickens. needless to say, if the pick's there, idea's like real's above would be in the mix. I might even pay more than that suggestion.
     
    therealdeal likes this.
  6. Punk-101

    Punk-101 - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    2,880
    Likes Received:
    7,867
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    If we traded clarkson, Lou or young, and the pick for butler, would we have enough to sign durant and whiteside as FAs?

    Also, assuming we'd need to trade for butler to get durant on board vs maybe getting derozen without making a trade, is the later that much worse?

    Russell/Huertas
    Butler/Young
    Durant/Brown
    Randle/Nance
    Whiteside/Black

    Vs

    Russell/Lou
    Derozen/Clarkson
    Ingram/Young
    Randle/Nance
    Whiteside/Black

    Birds in hands vs bushes I guess.
     
  7. Weezy

    Weezy Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    19,106
    Likes Received:
    78,080
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Anaheim
    Offline
    I'd gladly take either one of those rosters at the moment. Of course I'd prefer the first one, but we'd be lucky to even do the 2nd. Except for Young, replace his a**.
     
    therealdeal and Punk-101 like this.
  8. Savory Griddles

    Savory Griddles Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Messages:
    9,169
    Likes Received:
    22,447
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I think Butler would take the pick and Russell or Randle. And I'd probably choose Russell of the two simply because Butler is a guard and we'd still have Clarkson. I think any offer that doesn't include the pick AND Russell or Randle gets us hung up on. But Butler, Randle and Clarkson is a nice little core to tempt two free agents.
     
  9. LaVarBallsDad

    LaVarBallsDad - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    16,172
    Likes Received:
    31,056
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    We're in position where we can't be picky. So, you go into asset acquisition mode; spend the money this summer. Actually, you have too. The salary floor will be over $80 million dollars.
     
    therealdeal likes this.
  10. tada

    tada - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2014
    Messages:
    4,560
    Likes Received:
    8,855
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Online
    My take is pretty clear. Everyone on the roster is expendable except for Randle. It's nearly impossible to find a double-double machine with so much discipline. He's our alpha next year.

    I'm not sure if Russell is a better talent than Simmons/Ingram. I trust the FO to make the right decision, but as of today I like Ingram better. So if we're trading for Butler I'd rather ship Russell/Clarkson.
     
    therealdeal likes this.
  11. lakerjones

    lakerjones Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    10,955
    Likes Received:
    32,706
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    La La land
    Offline
    I'd be willing to trade the pick and Clarkson for Butler. I think Russell and Randle are keepers.
     
  12. southbaylakers72

    southbaylakers72 - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2014
    Messages:
    609
    Likes Received:
    259
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    El Segundo, California
    Offline
    Nick Batum over Derozan please.
     
    Savory Griddles likes this.
  13. Kenzo

    Kenzo - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    7,762
    Likes Received:
    16,293
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Poland
    Offline
    They're both 3rd best players on a championship team but we have to start somewhere. Derozan gets lots of heat on Raps boards, never watched him close enough to judge him the way they do.
     
  14. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    29,258
    Likes Received:
    79,346
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    i've come to think derozan could blossom in la, even if he's not a superstar. i just don't think he'll be available. toronto can't afford to let him walk, imo.
     
    therealdeal likes this.
  15. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Yes.

    Russell/Randle/Butler/A. Brown?/Larry Nance Jr./Cap Holds = roughly 32 million dollars. If the salary cap hits the expected 92 million spot, we've got 60 million to spend. Durant's max is about 25-26 million and Whiteside's is 21-22 million. We'd even have cash left over.
    Not much worse no, I'd take either of those teams! But I'd rather have the one with Butler/Durant than the one without those two.
     
    Punk-101 and tada like this.
  16. tada

    tada - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2014
    Messages:
    4,560
    Likes Received:
    8,855
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Online
    Given how bad our fortunes have been lately, I'd like to keep my expectations reasonable.

    I would be quite happy with just getting a new coach.
    If we keep the pick I would be ecstatic.
    Whiteside would be a godsend.
    If we also get Barnes or Derozan my head would explode.
    Durant would take a miracle.

    Of course, worst case scenario would be to keep Byron, lose the pick (50/50 chance), and no big name FA coming. All of which is more than likely to happen.
     
    lakerjones, therealdeal and abeer3 like this.
  17. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    29,258
    Likes Received:
    79,346
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    yeah, i'm trying to manage expectations. things are probably going to play out much closer to the worst-case, given the last two or three years. the one shred of optimism i've got is that i'm pretty sure that a) scott is going to be fired and b) even if the lakers strike out on big FAs, they're going to try and make more than stopgap moves this summer.
     
    tada and therealdeal like this.
  18. lakerjones

    lakerjones Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    10,955
    Likes Received:
    32,706
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    La La land
    Offline
    This is going to be a fascinating and potentially exciting offseason. It's essentially a make or break moment for this front office. It's a bit sad to me that it has come to this, but it's a big business, even if family run, and the Lakers FO has hit this wall where they need to move forward in a big way or they will have to concede defeat and resign.

    Despite a godawful season, a complete horror show of coaching, and the inevitable retirement of arguably our greatest player in franchise history, I think we are actually in a pretty good position if the FO gets it together this offseason.

    We have a young core that we can develop and/or move a piece or two for an established vet to help us either lure FA's or just bolster this squad in general. If we keep the pick we can follow suit in the same way - pick up a nice addition to the core we already have or move the player along with one or more of the core to get better in a hurry. Tanking hurt, but at least we have that 55% chance which is the best we'd get going up against the tankmasters Philly this year. Even if we lose the pick, we'll keep it next year with no more protection in a better draft class and finally be done with this top 3 protection nonsense.

    While it's beyond unlikely that we'll get the top FA in Durant (I would bet just about everything I have that he'll sign the 1 plus 1 with OKC and give it another shot), there are a number of second tier guys who could really help us including Whiteside, Horford, Batum, maybe Barnes, Ezeli . . . I think we even have a shot at Derozan.

    I'm hopeful in other words. I think the FO is going to be fighting for their lives basically to put together something better and keep their jobs.

    Even though I want Boron gone after tomorrow night's game, I think he's the last piece of the puzzle for the FO. First is the pick, Second is whether we trade it (if we are able to keep it) at draft night, third is FA. I don't think they'll make their decision on him until after those things are resolved. If we strike out in all departments I can see them throwing in the towel and keeping him to tank for one final time before they go out with a whimper.

    But I'm optimistic that they will be going hard and putting together a better contending team and if they do, they will need a MUCH better coach to get them there such as Thibs, Ollie, Luke . . .
     
    gcclaker, tada, therealdeal and 2 others like this.
  19. Battle Tested20

    Battle Tested20 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    9,213
    Likes Received:
    24,866
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Technical Data Analyst
    Location:
    Fair Oaks, CA
    Offline
    Yeah I'm with you lakerjones on the Durant piece. I definitely think he'll sign the 1 + 1 deal with OKC this off-season. This way he can talk with Westbrook next off-season and make an easier case to stay or sign somewhere else.
     
    lakerjones likes this.
  20. LaVarBallsDad

    LaVarBallsDad - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    16,172
    Likes Received:
    31,056
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    We need to re-sign Bass.
     

Share This Page