Los Angeles Lakers: Searching for the Perfect Dump

Discussion in 'Lakers Discussion' started by Doc Brown, May 3, 2016.

Page 12 of 14
  1. Helljumper

    Helljumper - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    4,933
    Likes Received:
    14,677
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Offline
    I doubt the front office would want Gay and I doubt he'd be okay with a reserve role, but I'd gladly take him. I think we could find 20-25 minutes of playing time for him. We could even roll out a line-up with Ingram, Gay, and Deng all on the floor at the same time.
     
    Helljumper, Jul 26, 2016
    #221
  2. gcclaker

    gcclaker Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    9,035
    Likes Received:
    20,545
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Wherever I am at the moment...
    Offline
    Agree... Gay would want a starting role being one for most of his career at this point. With that said...I still say Sefolosha. Play the 2 and 3 position...can d up there plus switch on the 1 during pick and rolls.
     
    gcclaker, Jul 26, 2016
    #222
  3. gcclaker

    gcclaker Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    9,035
    Likes Received:
    20,545
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Wherever I am at the moment...
    Offline
    You can sub in Nance for Deng too...Randle slides to the middle. Even younger and faster though not much experience on the floor but you have to start somewhere.
     
    gcclaker, Jul 26, 2016
    #223
    therealdeal likes this.
  4. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    28,522
    Likes Received:
    76,740
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    can't understand why okc hasn't absorbed gay, actually. maybe they want to miss the playoffs?
     
    abeer3, Jul 26, 2016
    #224
  5. gcclaker

    gcclaker Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    9,035
    Likes Received:
    20,545
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Wherever I am at the moment...
    Offline
    He'd be a great fit with OKC...starting caliber 3 to pair with Westbrook. Not the nova scorer like Durant but brings a third of the production without cutting into Westbrook's shot attempts.
     
    gcclaker, Jul 26, 2016
    #225
  6. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    They've cleared exactly enough money to offer Russell Westbrook a two year (plus one) extension so I imagine that's exactly what's going on right now.

    If you're OKC you offer him the extension which would lock him in for two years at the current max salary. He gets a raise and you get a modicum of stability after the chaos of Durant leaving. If Westbrook turns down an extension, then trade him now while you can and get into the rebuild process asap. There's no way the Thunder can wait until the deadline to move him when everyone would know how desperate they'd be at that point.

    The scary part is I'm starting to worry the Lakers are players in that game. If Westbrook refuses to sign an extension and the Thunder go shopping, I could definitely see the Lakers sending a couple kids to OKC in order to get Westbrook from them.
     
    therealdeal, Jul 27, 2016
    #226
    LaVarBallsDad and abeer3 like this.
  7. sirronstuff

    sirronstuff - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    31,778
    Likes Received:
    77,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Your time is running out Ham
    Location:
    Laker Purgatory
    Offline
    Why doesn't someone absorb Gay?

    Does anyone know if they want to get rid of Gay?

    Are they calling offering Gay?

    Do they want to trade Gay for something else?

    Never understood why everyone likes Gay.

    I mean I like Gay just as much as anyone else, not that there's anything wrong with that.

    Is Gay good in the locker room?

    How is Gay with the ball in his hand taking it to the hole?

    How would you defend the ball if Gay was covering you?

    [​IMG]

    This is being talked about in a thread about dumps
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jul 27, 2016
    sirronstuff, Jul 27, 2016
    #227
    abeer3 and LTLakerFan like this.
  8. trodgers

    trodgers Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    12,178
    Likes Received:
    18,528
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Professor of Humanities
    Location:
    Orlando
    Online
    Why scary? Didn't you argue that they should do it?
     
    trodgers, Jul 27, 2016
    #228
  9. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    28,522
    Likes Received:
    76,740
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    scary because it would be a risk? still feeling burned by the howard situation. i just trust that the FO wouldn't enter into a situation like this without feeling VERY confident about keeping westbrook. stakes are bigger now, as in the howard trade, i think the FO didn't figure bynum into long term plans. getting westbrook would take no less than two of the young 4, one of them almost certainly being russell (who's the best among them, imo).
     
    abeer3, Jul 27, 2016
    #229
    LaVarBallsDad likes this.
  10. LaVarBallsDad

    LaVarBallsDad - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    16,172
    Likes Received:
    31,056
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I ama starting to come around to doing it.
     
    Last edited: Jul 27, 2016
    LaVarBallsDad, Jul 27, 2016
    #230
  11. tada

    tada - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2014
    Messages:
    4,467
    Likes Received:
    8,535
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Yeah I thought real was willing to give up Russell+Randle for a 1-year rental of Westbrook.
     
    tada, Jul 27, 2016
    #231
  12. SFGOLDRUSHER

    SFGOLDRUSHER - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2014
    Messages:
    3,094
    Likes Received:
    2,181
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Master Optimist.
    Location:
    San Diego
    Offline
    No way real, this is Mitch were talking about... If Westbrook signs next year, then the following year George&Cousins can be UFA.

    Can you imagine if kept everyone and signed them?
     
    SFGOLDRUSHER, Jul 27, 2016
    #232
    Battle Tested20 likes this.
  13. trodgers

    trodgers Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    12,178
    Likes Received:
    18,528
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Professor of Humanities
    Location:
    Orlando
    Online
    It's scary to me. But that's because I wouldn't do it.
     
    trodgers, Jul 28, 2016
    #233
    TIME likes this.
  14. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Scary because we haven't signed Ingram yet. I said Russsell/Randle, but I'm afraid they're considering Russell/Ingram or another such package around Ingram. I don't want to let go of Ingram.
     
    therealdeal, Jul 28, 2016
    #234
    trodgers and gcclaker like this.
  15. Khmrp

    Khmrp - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2016
    Messages:
    12,146
    Likes Received:
    13,862
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Gay just doesnt seem like a winning type player to me.....big #s from time to time but little impact

    -also i brought up the westbrook/okc ext info weeks ago, reports then were he wasn't signing it and no matter who hes traded to he wont sign that ext, he wants to explore FA
     
    Khmrp, Jul 28, 2016
    #235
    trodgers likes this.
  16. LaVarBallsDad

    LaVarBallsDad - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    16,172
    Likes Received:
    31,056
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    They'll part with one of the kids; probably Russell. I doubt Mitch gives us two of the best out of our BEST young prospects; I really doubt that. I've been very critical of Mitch, but he has done very well in trades, drafting, etc; I think the one area where we get on Mitch is convincing top notch free agents to sign here; and, of course, an argument can be made for not getting rid of Pau or Dwight when you had the chance and the Nash deal.

    Nevertheless, he's one of the most highly respected GM's. He's a fair man. He knows the value a Westbrook brings to a team, but he's not going to sell the farm for him, IMO. He'll offer 1 of Ingram/Russell and probably Randle. They'll be other players included to get match salaries. However, looking at it from purely asset standpoint; Boston beats us and they probably take the risk on Westbrook. Now, does Westbrook want to go to Boston? Does he even have a choice in the matter? IDK. All IMO!
     
    LaVarBallsDad, Jul 28, 2016
    #236
  17. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I'm with you and I tend to agree mostly, it's just the tea leaves that I'm seeing. I hope I'm wrong and I hope nothing comes of it. If the Lakers are as confident as they're rumored to be, then they won't trade BOTH #2 picks for Westbrook. I truly hope that's not the case. If we part with one it'll be a bittersweet moment for me, but I can live with it since we'd end up with an MVP candidate. I just don't like that we haven't signed Ingram yet and the Westbrook news suddenly got quiet. I don't like it at all.
     
    therealdeal, Jul 28, 2016
    #237
  18. Weezy

    Weezy Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    18,724
    Likes Received:
    75,982
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Anaheim
    Offline
    HATE the idea of trading one of Russell or Ingram for Westbrook. If anyone should be thrown out first it's Clarkson/Randle. Clarkson plays so similar to Westbrook they're almost redundant. At least Russell and Westbrook's style of game are completely different. I don't want to trade for him though, so tired of hearing about it on tv every day.
     
    Weezy, Jul 28, 2016
    #238
    trodgers likes this.
  19. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I'm pretty sure Clarkson is untouchable until December because we can't trade him so soon after signing him.
     
    therealdeal, Jul 28, 2016
    #239
    Barnstable likes this.
  20. SFGOLDRUSHER

    SFGOLDRUSHER - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2014
    Messages:
    3,094
    Likes Received:
    2,181
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Master Optimist.
    Location:
    San Diego
    Offline
    Yeah, like we're gonna tell Westbrook, "Hey! We traded for you so now you have to re-sign with us" lol. Like I said, if he wants to come hell even simply be smart enough to tell the Lakers to not give up assets they can use if he outright signs.

    Cmon y'all.
     
    SFGOLDRUSHER, Jul 28, 2016
    #240
    trodgers likes this.
Page 12 of 14

Share This Page