2026-27 Team Developments: Trades / Free Agents / News / Rumors / Ideas

Discussion in 'Lakers Discussion' started by TIME, Jun 14, 2026.

  1. ElginTheGreat

    ElginTheGreat - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    12,450
    Likes Received:
    36,278
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Online
    Yeah. I'm not a cap expert either but its something like that.
     
    FrontOfJersey22 likes this.
  2. nluna75

    nluna75 - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2014
    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    328
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Online

    His contract has no effect on our cap space except for his 20.9 million cap hoid. His contract will be the last to be signed.
     
    Cookie, TIME and FrontOfJersey22 like this.
  3. nluna75

    nluna75 - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2014
    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    328
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Online
    Only his 20.9 million cap hold afffects our cap room this summer. He will sign his contract last after everything else is taken care of.
     
    lakerjones and FrontOfJersey22 like this.
  4. ldawg

    ldawg - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2026
    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    217
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Online
  5. Garren04

    Garren04 - Rookie -

    Joined:
    May 11, 2019
    Messages:
    239
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Offline
    Correct. However, that only works if you are making your moves for the future THIS OFFSEASON. So with that said the front office is on the clock. If the Max he could have gotten from another team is 178M there is no reason to give him 185. Also the contract increases to 51 per year with a player option. This contract does not protect the franchise in terms of value. If the Lakers are going to be executing trades or signing guys that can help you this summer then yes it is not a huge concern.
     
  6. Astros

    Astros - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2023
    Messages:
    668
    Likes Received:
    1,798
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Online
    Everyone in the NBA/Lakers fanbase seems to believe it's an overpay but you'll get a VERY different reaction here with people claiming it's a fantastic deal. Yeah, totally fantastic deal to give a guy the max who was never going to leave if he got the max... such a great deal, lol.

    I better not hear people complain about LeBron or blame others on the team. When your two stars make $90 million, they better be able to carry the games for the most part. Blaming poor Jake LaRavia when Reaves is about to make $40 million next season and puts on 16 point performances with average defense isn't going to be a great look.
     
  7. ldawg

    ldawg - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2026
    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    217
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Online
    Austin and Trey young singed the two worst contracts for far this offseason.
     
  8. Garren04

    Garren04 - Rookie -

    Joined:
    May 11, 2019
    Messages:
    239
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Offline
    It’s just a clear overpay when it didn’t need to be. I think it’s clear we probably gave into his agent a bit. He didn’t even have any other offers yet and then you go and overpay. Sure teams could’ve cleared space and offered him a max but make them go do that then you offer the contract.
     
  9. FrontOfJersey22

    FrontOfJersey22 - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2021
    Messages:
    7,302
    Likes Received:
    13,139
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Yes, the reason is making him feel wanted and have no reason to meet with other teams.
    Our FO painted themselves into this position by telling Luka to wait and see, specifically for THIS summer.
    I would not have done this.
    People saying “he had no other offers” have no idea what they are talking about. So, they know what’s going on in the Front Offices like Detroit, who could have offered him a five year deal for many more millions.
    Absurd and ridiculous.
     
    Cookie likes this.
  10. FrontOfJersey22

    FrontOfJersey22 - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2021
    Messages:
    7,302
    Likes Received:
    13,139
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    How does anyone know he wouldn’t be getting any other offers?
     
  11. ldawg

    ldawg - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2026
    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    217
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Online
    I don't think lakers will ever trade Austin. However if they ever need to trade him no one is taking that contract.
     
  12. ldawg

    ldawg - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2026
    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    217
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Online
    From who? It was the same the last time he was a free agent. There were rumored interest but no one offered a contract. Meaning no one was going to overpay knowing he wanted to be a Laker and lakers were going to pay to keep him. So is it an over pay? Yes his options were limited. Both him and young are like 10mil too much.
     
  13. Garren04

    Garren04 - Rookie -

    Joined:
    May 11, 2019
    Messages:
    239
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Offline
    It’s not that he wouldn’t but make the other teams show you. Make them clear that space. People think that just dumping salary and loading off contracts is easy in today’s nba. Actually it’s the opposite it’s very very difficult. Let’s say Detroit make them clear that salary before you go and offer a gigantic contract.
     
  14. The Laker Link 3.0

    The Laker Link 3.0 - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Messages:
    384
    Likes Received:
    562
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Riverton, UT
    Online
    Okay, so this is what I was trying to point to in the other conversation. About the difference of what we got and what You and Others feel he was worth.

    So we are understanding each other enough. That's good.

    And you're right that a pick would have to be traded, but in that regard, we have to also look at where we are WHEN that happens. A 2 year window, seems a little excessive. I get the reasoning why and the need to say it, but like....if they win a title within his and Luka's contract, then I agree that we won't be caring much about these contracts, but we'll see.......

    Anyways, my point of not knowing what the future looks like is whether or not we are going to be sad about NOT having that pick when we need it. Not every year is a 1st Rounder needed to make a difference. Not having one for a few years in a row, is obviously bad, but like....some here and there......not that big of a deal.
     
  15. ldawg

    ldawg - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2026
    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    217
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Online
    Laker were the only team that could have offered a 5 year deal.
     
  16. Weezy

    Weezy Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    20,202
    Likes Received:
    83,462
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Anaheim
    Offline
  17. Astros

    Astros - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2023
    Messages:
    668
    Likes Received:
    1,798
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Online
    Basically, this and next season are win-now mode.

    If not, they've got problems on their hand. Huge gamble on Reaves.

    The days of him putting in 15 point off the bench performances are over. He's gotta be a consistent 25/5/5 player with good shooting splits or he'll rightfully get blasted by Lakers fans.

    Let's see if he can do it.
     
  18. The Laker Link 3.0

    The Laker Link 3.0 - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Messages:
    384
    Likes Received:
    562
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Riverton, UT
    Online
    Listen, if you say this is terrible.....congratulations. You can say it and go about your day. I don't think anyone here is saying this is a great deal here, because of the money, I think they are happy we kept him and this helps make Luka happy.

    You guys look at the cap hit and others look at the overall product. The Cap is going to be SO DIFFERENT when we get to the point of needing to move on from Reaves and Luka, also MARK WALTER will be in control. The dude who helped supply the money to sign Othani and everyone else to HOW MUCH AGAIN? And the Dodgers have gone on to win how many titles after that?

    There's always a way to course correct. Again, hate this all you want if you do....that's fine, but getting mad at people for liking the signing is ridiculous too. Everyone realizes that the other side is thought of as delusional based on how you feel about this, right?

    So we are just saying "Your opinion sucks" in circles for no reason.
     
    Cookie and FrontOfJersey22 like this.
  19. Astros

    Astros - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2023
    Messages:
    668
    Likes Received:
    1,798
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Online
    NBA has a salary cap, lmfao.

    MLB doesn't.

    Quite a huge difference in how you can spend money strategically, don't you think? Or are we just babbling nonsense again?
     
  20. Garren04

    Garren04 - Rookie -

    Joined:
    May 11, 2019
    Messages:
    239
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Offline
    So here’s my thinking the contract is fine if you are going to go all in. As in like right now. Every single pick better be on the table.
     

Share This Page