2022-23 Team Developments: News / Trades / Free Agents / Rumors

Discussion in 'Lakers Discussion' started by BangBoomPow, Jun 3, 2021.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Mr. Rambis

    Mr. Rambis - Rookie - LB Verified Insider

    Joined:
    May 9, 2019
    Messages:
    739
    Likes Received:
    4,243
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Offline
    Today's news is confirming the sense I got around Philly & Simmons. FO is very stressed about the situation.

    On the LA side, haven't been in touch lately, but not surprised to hear the Lakers offering Kuzma around. However I would not be alarmed. As I mentioned earlier, they're mainly trying to get a sense of the "return" for him, rather than trying to desperately get rid of him ASAP. Just surveying the field, if you will.

    Am still making my way through the other coast but as always please send me a message if you need anything. All the Best!!!
     
  2. Slick2021

    Slick2021 - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2021
    Messages:
    8,266
    Likes Received:
    7,059
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I'd rather trade Kuz for Bagley and try to switch picks with the Kings or more likely pick up a 2nd rounder. Bagley at worst could be packaged somewhere else.
     
  3. Mr. Rambis

    Mr. Rambis - Rookie - LB Verified Insider

    Joined:
    May 9, 2019
    Messages:
    739
    Likes Received:
    4,243
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Offline
    Before I run, Hield news coming from Lakers FO. Note the tone of the article, and also what I said earlier. Enjoy!!

     
  4. The Rock

    The Rock - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2014
    Messages:
    2,939
    Likes Received:
    7,439
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Thank you Mr. Rambis. Insightful as always.

    What's the Lakers FO's thoughts on Schroder? Is he simply a S& T asset at this point?
     
  5. JSM

    JSM - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    17,574
    Likes Received:
    68,257
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline

    Hawks are the surprising name there. They have some young pieces that could be attractive, if mixed with picks. Collins, Huerter, and Reddish (especially after the post season showing he had).

    They will never be able to land a marquee FA here (they've done a great job with supporting parts this past season for the first time in years), so if they can get someone of Beal's caliber in trade, you overpay if you have to. A Beal/Trae pairing could attract a 3rd piece within a year.
     
  6. karacha

    karacha Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    8,583
    Likes Received:
    27,811
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Of all these names, Buddy Hield is probably the most realistic. I don't think we're going to get these all stars that are being discussed.
     
    TIME and ElginTheGreat like this.
  7. ElginTheGreat

    ElginTheGreat - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    10,792
    Likes Received:
    29,911
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I definitely think that a lot of things are being tossed out there just to see if they can get any traction.

    I don't see Westbrook because even if we wanted to, that trade is very difficult to pull off because of salaries and needing Dennis to want to go to the Wizards. I have doubts on anything involving a sign and trade with Dennis.

    Hield is the most realistic in my mind (thanks again for the insights @Mr. Rambis).

    I'd think (hope) we are also looking at guys like Joe Ingles, Terrence Ross, and Harrison Barnes.
     
    Toneloc and abeer3 like this.
  8. ElginTheGreat

    ElginTheGreat - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    10,792
    Likes Received:
    29,911
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline

    Yeah. Barnes would work great. He can shoot and defend. Also, I didn't even realize he and Hield are pretty much the same age.
     
    lakerjones, abeer3 and TIME like this.
  9. TIME

    TIME Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    5,785
    Likes Received:
    22,645
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Lifelong Lakers fan.
    Location:
    LaLa Land
    Offline
    Agree with the posts above that are considering what is realistic.

    My realistic list in order of preference is Joe Ingles / Harrison Barnes / Buddy Hield.

    I'm just not sure Utah would want to move Ingles to us. Giving us a 45% three point shooter who can also do some playmaking would not be their smartest move.
     
  10. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    27,593
    Likes Received:
    74,525
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    yeah, our biggest plans have schroder cooperating (not his strong suit) and trez cooperating (don't blame him if he doesn't).

    i think we can definitely work a s&t with schroder, but it may not be to the location we want or for a player of great impact. we just need something, though, if only for trade salary matching later. and i'd prefer a player to a TE, if possible.

    hield is certainly realistic, but i don't think it's a great idea. also, he makes enough money that we'd have to give more than kuz to get him. again, will trez opt in and get moved there? same with barnes (whom i prefer to hield). giving up both kcp and kuz for one wing of that quality is a downgrade.

    and utah needs to move off salary, so i don't see how anything works, as we don't have any small salaries to work into a larger deal. i guess bogdanovic/ingles for kuz/kcp saves them 5 million, but it makes them worse.

    i think ross is a downgrade from either kuz or kcp.
     
    TIME and ElginTheGreat like this.
  11. ElginTheGreat

    ElginTheGreat - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    10,792
    Likes Received:
    29,911
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Completely agree on the Jazz.
     
    abeer3 and TIME like this.
  12. JSM

    JSM - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    17,574
    Likes Received:
    68,257
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline

    I really don't understand these small to middle market teams with borderline disgruntled superstars who aren't catering their players and are doing everything wrong in trying to keep them. Both Dame and Beal wanted a particular coach, neither got their guy, and that seems to have pushed both of their relationships with the respective front office to the brink. When the next time either of these teams will have a player of that caliber? If history tells us anything, it could be decades.
     
  13. 432J

    432J - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    6,780
    Likes Received:
    15,010
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    acquiring hield in exchange for kuzma and KCP would be a downgrade
     
  14. CarolinaLakerFan

    CarolinaLakerFan - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2014
    Messages:
    1,902
    Likes Received:
    5,908
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    South Carolina
    Offline
    This is an underrated sensible take. Last summer I wanted Christian Wood to pair alongside AD. The reason being that I think we’d be more dangerous with a pair of interchangeable 6’10-6’11 athletic bigs as opposed to a traditional center. Bagley would give us that. He can do almost everything AD can just not at AD’s level.
     
  15. JSM

    JSM - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    17,574
    Likes Received:
    68,257
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline

    How much $ are you willing to leave on the table?




    That 3rd year needs to be a Team Option.
     
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2021
  16. 432J

    432J - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    6,780
    Likes Received:
    15,010
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    i would do kuzma for bagley

    maybe a change of scenery would get bagley to finally reach his true potential
     
  17. Savory Griddles

    Savory Griddles Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Messages:
    9,152
    Likes Received:
    22,367
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I like how Shannon actually called out the "It's all about winning. " BS that athletes serve up. Gary Payton and Karl Malone are the only two guys I can think of that really signed contracts that were ALL about winning. They signed for peanuts compared to what they could have likely made with the explicit goal of getting a ring. Some people have signed for a little less to make their teams a little better, but if they were "all about winning" they would have taken minimum deals.
     
    tada, Weezy, alam1108 and 6 others like this.
  18. JSM

    JSM - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    17,574
    Likes Received:
    68,257
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Another vid from the DD interview, specifically about the Lakers


     
    tada, CarolinaLakerFan, Weezy and 6 others like this.
  19. VincePT

    VincePT - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2020
    Messages:
    996
    Likes Received:
    1,956
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    San Diego
    Offline
    DeRozan can have the MLE if he wants.

    more than that I wouldn't do. He's a known choker in the playoffs.

    I remember he choked so bad against Lebron in 2018, they had to take him off the court for most of the last 2 games.
     
  20. Barnstable

    Barnstable Supreme Fuzzler of Lakersball.com Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2014
    Messages:
    7,228
    Likes Received:
    18,404
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Offline
    Wow! That was such an explicit and targeted (but smart) way to make it 100% clear he wants to figure out a way to be a Laker. That wasn’t an interview with Shannon and Skip, it was just Shannon who is one of the biggest Lakers fans in the media. I wouldn’t be surprised if Demar’s agent didn’t directly tell Shannon to ask him those questions.


    I remember before we got AD, we were looking to get a #2 behind LeBron and a lot of people wanted DeRozen. I was totally against him as a #2. He’s not impactful enough for that, and can’t carry a team like a #2 nerd to do. But as a 3rd option, he’d be incredible. He can’t shoot 3s, but his midrange jumper is money. It would be a hell of a weapon offensively. Not sure about him defensively, but I’d do everything I could to get him if he’s willing to take a huge pay cut. Take him and never look back.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page