Yes. The expectation that a rookie will save us is the problem. They need time to develop. Ingram has a ways to go and Ball will need time as well.
If we want Ball then we should just pick him. Don't get cute with the trading down.
[MEDIA] Lot of interesting data on Lonzo here.
One thing is for sure, George seems to be doing everything he can to force his way to us. He's really done a good job of helping our position here.
[MEDIA]
Yeah. If the Russell trade doesn't bother folks then losing Randle and Clarkson shouldn't either.
Seriously. No way should either hold up a deal.
I searched for math and confused.
LOL. I used giphy.com This is a rumor that was posted. If this is true it will completely lift my spirits and restore my faith in the...
I think the Pacers just want to save face and make it look like they got value for him. They'd be better off with just the picks and...
So we end up trading DLO and Mosgov for George...... [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
Lopez "lead" the Nets to end up being one of two teams with less wins than us. If we don't add George, I think we win about the same amount of...
Several people have popped up that seem to share your joy that Russell is gone.
Absolutely. The two guys most complained about on here are Russell and Randle. Getting rid of both, adding Ball, Lopez, PG, and then having cap...
I actually agree with this. DLO, Randle, Mosgov, and 27/28 picks to bring in PG, Lopez, and Ball? Yeah, I'm good with that.
I'd expect another move to help with rebounding. Also Nance, when healthy, can crash the boards.
Randle (if that's who they want) and the two late picks definitely isn't overpaying.
exactly.
Pacers had to posture here to see if we would blink. I'm fine with using either Randle or Clarkson to get this done.
