If we gona keep rationalizing moz salary as avg due to cba then i guess black will be getting 20mill and when randle gets his ext we should give...
he's been benched 2 straight gms by the same Walton/Shaw that so desperately wanted him, FACT. You dont get benched to the point of no PT if...
He WAS an avg player......and why is it wrong to expect more from Moz? He's not paid like an avg player, so we shouldn't expect avg. You DONT...
this is a much clearer and more educated point vs what I was trying to say. I'm not saying who's the better player, I just want Dlo to to show...
No....i havent adjusted anything. Everything booker does well that id like to see dlo do has context adjustment but dlo has "reasons" for his...
You said you dont care if he scores 30, so because he manages a meager 4.8 asst that he cant be expected to score more pts too?
I never said I didn't like him....people getting bend of of shape cause Im expecting more from our #2 pick and providing example of a similar...
right, so I guess the next time Dlo scores 30 again you wont be in here praising that part right?
thats fine, but still better than Dlo, as for def you can't possibly say Dlo is that much better than Booker, Dlo per is 15.8, we're impressed...
more like a double standard.....like I said if Dlo avg #'s like Booker is right now, who in here is going to complain about #'s like that from a...
that was a 1 gm example....context sir. and if you gona throw shades how bout you provide Dlo #'s too instead of just per 36 cause at the moment...
Use all the context you like, we all saw the last pho gm against la, alot of what people using to down play booker isnt true, hes just as capable...
Booker creates his own shots, you guys just nit picking. Dlo can go for 4/6 and people praise him, booker shoots 19x a gm and scores 30 but...
More like selective memory....as for roles well...booker avg 3asst to dlo 5, im not exactly sure how much greater of a play maker dlo is to booker....
No i didnt use just the 21ppg...I said dlo should ask booker what playing at high lvl means and someone wanted to use advance stats to justify dlo...
Never said hes better, said dlo should talk to booker bout what playimg at high lvl. Again this team is as bad as pho, are we gona say our guys...
Once again your projecting onto booker while not using the same standards to apply to dlo. Is this team winning that much more than pho? I see...
Thats fine but like i said, if dlo did avg those #s whos gona come in here and say oh its only cause he plays 37mpg and high usage rate?
People using context reason to justify bookers #s....if dlo did same #s with equal usage and mpg nobody on here would use the "oh it's only 21ppg"...
You guys are talking as if booker is some stat padder playing on a bad team....what exactly is this laker team? Like Using wally to correlate to...
