same. as we discussed in the game thread, the middle stretch of the 4th was the same bad shots, they just went in instead. not a long term...
i'd gladly take turner, but as i said in the game chat, i have legitimate concerns about 90% of our salary cap being devoted to the frontcourt....
this truth hurts. really hate how that last game went. hate even more that boston would have won that game by 30. you're doing it right in...
i don't love the focus on FGAs--context matters--but yeah, it's clear AD is the best player on the team. the message is more for the FO than...
word. feel like there's not enough appreciation of the fact that despite all the bluster, we're still beating them where it counts. congrats on...
the fact that we're fighting about which 50 million dollar per year player is to blame for the loss is sort of all there is to say.
obviously if you put anyone under a microscope, stuff will surface, and i think the last bit is a stretch--but generally, this guy's right....
whole second unit never sees the floor together, though. walker reaves brown lebron AD sub schroder, russ, and bryant (for reaves, walker, AD)...
after the indy loss, you could knock me over with a feather if the lakers go 5-2 over their next 7. that game was important and sort of telling....
he's not. he won't get that on his next deal, and it's part of why he doesn't play for us right now. i'll be very surprised if a team offers...
now that he's accepted a bench role, teams will want him at the mini mle, imo.
were people mad about discussing trades? i wasn't. i'm just pushing back on the fury over trades not already happening/imaginary deadlines.
only if "we'll see" is the beginning of "we'll see both of them on the bench because reaves and walker are the starting guards".
totally agree on the bolded. my point is that it's all about the russ trade. we consolidated assets and killed our flexibility. then teams...
this is where i disagree with svtzr. he's right that the tax is big and designed to stop this stuff, but being the lakers is sort of about being...
i think so. the defensive slippage is very real, though. he's still a plus defender due to his size and incredible hoop iq, but it's nowhere...
i think the only consensus from the summer reporting is that, at minimum, indy wanted both picks, unprotected. the question is whether they were...
lebron's prime is over. it was really over last year, but people were too excited about his big scoring nights to realize it. we got a ring out...
he's moved one for schroder (good move, imo) and one for russ (we shouldn't have done that), right? we don't have the space to chase a third...
[IMG] i could see scenarios in which it made sense...
