If they take clarkson n throw in a Osman or a 2nd rd pick lol
but they losing, so get value for him while they can, kcp provides a stop gap of sorts i guess
maybe they want to move lee?
jc/hart can handle it....not trading kcp cause i dont like him but we know hes not in future plans, hell id take a high 2nd for lopez too with no...
kidd got fired with a 23-22 record....luke aint finishing with a .500 record, id bet on it n to clarify, not asking for firing now or firing for...
dont want kidd but this is a good example that that even with a winning record kidd still got canned. luke shouldnt be "safe" with this record,...
we should explore trades for kcp, even if its not with nyk, a late 1st or multiple 2nds is better than keeping him ros.....
they have their pick...i like hermongomez but you right no expiring...only guy close is kanter n we'd have to ensure he'll opt out or a 3rd team
what? it affects how mgmt has to match or not an offer or wait out those guys fa decision
his def rating hasnt been much better than jc, his saving grace is his recpectable 3pt %....not to mention his constant injuries
no thats your example.....you posted that #....doesnt that prove my pt that dall doesnt need to eat deng to get randle? Dall has shown they will...
if it means a higher chance at pg, id do it.
i dont disagree, im just stating they dont want him badly enough to eat deng to go along with randle unless they're sending us back equally bad...
those max lvl fa will take longer to decide, you have 2-3 days to match
isnt that better than paying him 20mill plus having deng at 18mill? whos to say someone doesnt offer randle 20mill still even if hes already in...
it was a hypothetical scenario question to real, so i didnt set anything in stone....Dec is only 1 month, my scenario was if no injuries but...
we can play guessing gm n whos bluffing n whos not, but im betting the house that dall isnt gona budge n absorb deng w/o sending back equally bad...
i thought of him as as a taller clarkson who gotten more opportunities
based on current projections....
but why is this "earned mins" criteria only applicable to randle? i dont see it being used against any of the other young players, ingram can go...
