i don't know why folks went gaga over porter. i don't think he's a difference maker, and monk is worth more than him, imo. my thought on THT is...
again, whatevs. i don't want him. it was just an interesting thing today, which was fun. back to moving russ to charlotte, plz.
yes and yes. i posted a lot earlier about how it was possible, but i never wanted kyrie here. let's wait out the carnage and be opportunistic....
yeah, the more i thought about it, the more i realized they figure they need to max out his value, and this is probably its highest point. would...
my thought was wall for russ and cash or a 2nd (just as a thanks). they're about to buy wall out anyway. this is only if we got kyrie, though....
while i certainly agree that they know the cba better than i do, i don't think slick's and my interpretation are wrong here. there's no arcane...
and now the press is (finally) starting to put together why this is realistic.
right. the leaks coming out of brooklyn are face-savers, imo. "these guys killed our culture. it's our decision to move on." no. you gambled...
the nets changing their public stance in this way tells me he's gone. those are some bold words to filter through windhorst.
yeah, i think the only way it works is if there's a sort of handshake deal that we'll have space next summer, so unless russ is traded for other...
to me this is why they should do the opt-in and trade with us. you've got kd under contract. use russ's expiring to flesh out the roster and see...
lol, that is pretty hilarious.
i'm not an expert, but i think it means it's where everyone's betting, and the book is worried they'll lose their shirt if they let that number...
we don't know what bkn's offering. is it only like, 100 million guaranteed over 3 years? we know it's not his 4 year max. what if lebron's...
i really dislike bayless.
if they offered kd/kyrie for AD/russ, i'd have to listen. and i'm AD's biggest fan on this site. i still think the nets should opt-in and trade...
yes and no. if lebron wants all of his money, no. if he's willing to take a temporary cut, then no problem at all.
yeah, i looked it up. weird. i actually thought lebron would have considered doing that for this (and many other) reasons. would be tragicomic...
depends on what comes with it, but mostly yes. again, russ was an actual net negative last year. that's 40% of your cash going to someone who's...
thought he had a player option. edit: maybe not. i just assume it in every star's contract nowadays.
