I'm sorry but I feel this thread is redundant. This topic was beaten to death after the Hibbert trade.
Sorry but what does 'stretching' a player mean?
I wouldn't move Sacre just for the sake of dumping him. He's got great character, a great piece as another big body in practice, and you could...
OK so we'd have: Russell - Williams Clarkson - J.Brown Kobe - Young - A.Brown Randle - Bass - Nance - Kelly Hibbert - Black - Sacre That's 14...
It's OK. He's coming off the bench (behind D'Angelo, Clarkson, Kobe) sooner or later. Streaky shooters have their value as a 6th man.
I think all we need is another wing.
Man, this is like a brand new team! Love it!
Don't think so. Julius is a SF-PF whereas Brandon is a PF-C. The dude is HUGE.
Bass and Hibbert could go the same boxing gym :cool: [MEDIA]
Yeah we could throw the 300+ pages of FA Discussion thread out the window because none of that talk had us taking Hibbert, Williams, and Bass :D
Thanks :clap:
What's our ceiling with everyone healthy and rookies panning out?
Not.even.funny
I think Taj is a PF and PF only, but it's OK because we have Randle and Lance who can play some minutes at SF
Mitch is now entering God mode
Thanks!!
When doea the cap set at either $67 or $69 mil?
Losing Nick would mean losing depth at SF while gaining depth at PG with Lou. In other words, a lateral move in terms of our depth chart. Edit:...
I think Russell would have to prove himself to start, which I like.
I'd much prefer a Sacre/Kelly dump over a Young dump.
