If they are smart they will do one or the other...
He needs to be, and if not he needs to be taken out of the rotation completely...
Well the message board is all over the place and more and more trades are being suggested with moving PatBev and Walker out and not Westbrook...
Again, it is like no one is watching these games and how Ham keeps using Westbrook all the time and we are having to overcome his complete...
Yes, I hope beyond hope this ends all the Myles Turner talk....
I have yet to read anyone say Bev + Walker are "shooters". I have also yet to read anyone say they are "feared' or "guarded" or anything like that...
Somebody wrote this very thing a day or so ago lol
Now James AND Davis already ruled out for Monday's game... This team could care less about winning...don't know why we even entertain ourselves...
They are a facing a dilemma right now to be sure. Ham seems a little overmatched in his decision making and not wanting to ruffle the ego of some...
Lets agree to disagree and move on. Bottom line is I never really argued the point we wouldn't have been better in those 20 games without him....
wait and see, wait and see lol
Slick prediction of a win in Boston....another "wait and see" that we waited for and saw....not happen. Ham shows some balls and sits Westbrick...
I thought Ham finally grew some balls in the 4th quarter (and we win in regulation if it wasnt for the Refs)....but then they shrivel and in comes...
It is always easy to pick out a possession or two and say had he been in there it would have made the difference. I pointed out several reasons...
The argument was never about whether he would improve upon our 10-10 record had he played. I repeatedly conceded that would have been more likely...
Palatable sure. More likely I would say not. They seem to want to make him part of the nucleus...
Feelings are definitely mutual, especially all your wait and sees that never materialize and yet we get more and more of them:Laugh: lol
Nah, you can read slower I guess- Repeatedly I say adding Turner would help, so there is no disregarding his notion 1) It doesn't become literal...
Um, like I already pointed out he scored 25, 25 and 27 (and missed a game) over a 4-game stretch during that "never looking back" you highlighted....
I dont see the logic in this extension with Turner aside from them committing to him based on the season he has had.... and I don't know how you...
