yeah...that could be a lot of folks. "very connected". plaschke likes to stir the pot. could it happen? sure. but it would be as bad a look...
eventually, the miles catch up to these dynastic teams, as we saw. maybe toronto takes advantage. not a bad story for them.
Garland or trade down.
or math. top 5 picks tend not to wash out, meaning they're overrepresented in the general pool of players. with 15 on a roster, statistically...
lol, but it is true that their fans think we'd potentially give them the #4 for him.
i'm for gambling on upside near the top of the draft, and in the modern era, that means gambling on elite skill/hoop iq as opposed to size and...
that's a good ways out of the city, though. almost enough that it qualifies as a summer home.
i'm confident that we have the best package for a team in NO's position. but you can't know what they want. if they decide to go get a current...
it's not great. it's kinda like what would have happened if we just kept lopez and chose an nba caliber wing instead of stephenson last year....
yeah, i agree. zion reminds me a lot of young larry johnson, who was really good prior to the injuries. is that a generational talent, though?...
they also lose the certainty of the draft picks. right now, you know the approximate value of the current picks, but once the season starts, it's...
problem is that i think ball's more valuable than the 6th pick in this draft. i'm guessing NO thinks so, too.
i think he's firmly in the mix of players expected to be drafted between 4 and 8 (along with garland, hunter, culver, and reddish). the bit i saw...
yeah. irving's super flawed. and still WAY better than all non-lebron lakers.
if you're philly, do you consider shocking the world and moving, say, ben simmons for beal and a pick or something? i know people might laugh at...
they have memphis's lotto pick either next year or the year after, too. gotta figure that's in their initial offer. but the deal i outlined...
the one-year S&T has to be KCP, and it can't really be a one-year, right? it would have to be three years with two non-guaranteed years on the...
No.
IF a davis deal happens, we're losing both ingram and zo, imo. probably with zo going to a third team.
Not great. And his athleticism didn't jump off the screen in college. Due diligence, though.
