Future Ingram would have put up 60/30/17 en route to a 150-point blowout.
They were one of the worst teams in the league. Butt covered. and they’d gladly give us all non-Zion assets for AD tomorrow. And you know that.
We weren’t handcuffed by lebron. We were enabled by him. We’d have had zero shot at AD without him. We’d be in 13th place and looking at firing...
Harkless knicker diwn threes against us, no? And he’s a better defender than Morris. Yo me, Morris and Jackson were acquired to a) keep them...
2 elites never available. plus, we have two elites. argument never lived, tbh.
We didn’t have Zion. Argument dead.
I’d play Marcus with a small and tell them to sit in the 3. If they want to run their offense around posting Morris, they’re welcome to it. Same...
If only he had a future, though, right? He’s like 38 years old.
we’ll see him again. Scoring 20ppg for a lotto team. Question is will I have to deal with folks claiming we gave up the future when it happens.
Career to date, Markieff has probably been better overall. Good thing we didn’t trade a bunch for the lesser version?
right. keeps acting like if he just hung on, ingram and company would be the '04 pistons (who needed the injury luck we deride in our own chances...
if "sustainability" is "slowly starving to death on rotten broccoli" (i.e., the ingram lakers)...i'll take bob lanier.
marcus morris went 3-9 with 6 points in 30+ minutes. if his name rhymed with nyle nuzma, we'd have the pitchforks out.
like going back in time and doing what we did again?
there was some other guy on that team, too, right? funny name. multi-time finals mvp. feel like he was involved. and lol at the 60s C Bags...
it would be very morey to just claim him anyway, tbh.
it has a pompadour. and i own 4.
Someone forgot to tell Memphis that AD isn’t that good on offense.
Don’t like it.
lots of young players improve their first few years. but there's always a tailing off point. if ingram improves much beyond this, he'll be off...
