depends on what comes with it, but mostly yes. again, russ was an actual net negative last year. that's 40% of your cash going to someone who's...
thought he had a player option. edit: maybe not. i just assume it in every star's contract nowadays.
could mean they lose a chance to get out from under a contract that might doom their chances at a rebuild (looking at you, charlotte)....
hard cap. won't be an s&t. either opt-in and trade (best for everyone, but bkn seems to be playing hardball there) or he walks into whatever we...
do you mean this year? that would be SPICY! lebron could opt out, and maybe we move THT and nunn into someone's space for a couple 2nd rounders....
but why does this matter to other teams? because they think they have more leverage? that's dumb/greedy, and can get you burned. if you wanted...
[MEDIA] want everyone to remember this is what the internet is doing, just in case we have another pau situation where everyone screams...
mad that kareem made me google "bubble gut"
i think if we offered him the mini-mid at midnight for two years with a player option on year two, he'd take it and not take other calls. i...
yeah, and nobody questions it. like, when you write about teams talking wall, and then turn around and say nobody will touch westbrook, do you...
i think it's real. and i think bkn should strongly consider taking russ and a protected 1st as opposed to kyrie just walking. or, as others...
lol, what i (and sk) just said. the issue is that bkn isn't offering a long-term, guaranteed deal. so he could look at it as taking a financial...
only if they think he won't just walk. i think they have to consider it a credible threat, which gives him a ton of leverage, imo. if they think...
yeah, it sucks. i'll be curious to see who pays him, though. his quotes and those from his family really indicate that his preference is to play...
i was thrilled we signed lebron. i thought it would save the franchise, and it did. i'm worried about what we're going to do when he's gone.
no. you continue to be wrong about this. but everyone knows it, including you, so... anyway, saw that frank jackson's option won't be picked up...
it's been established many times over that the 20-21 team was objectively superior to the 21-22 team, yet you repeat this all the time....
i actually think that so far it's been both, not one or the other. i think if we can get one or the other (good players for picks or meh players...
yes.
what on earth is happening here. o woj on high, give us anything to actually discuss.
