Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dies

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion and Philosophy -(FORUM CLOSED)-' started by revgen, Sep 18, 2020.

  1. revgen

    revgen - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,833
    Likes Received:
    4,203
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline

    https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/416004-supreme-court-justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-dies

    If/when Trump elects a replacement before the November election, it's going to wipe out any chance the Dems have of trying to contest the election.
     
    John3:16 and KareemtheGreat33 like this.
  2. KareemtheGreat33

    KareemtheGreat33 - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    11,782
    Likes Received:
    23,911
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Brow-beater
    Location:
    Las Islas Filipinas
    Offline
    I laugh at the alleged last wish of RBG, LMAO! Of course, they want to politicize her even in death
     
    John3:16 and revgen like this.
  3. 432J

    432J - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    6,897
    Likes Received:
    15,264
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Online
    “The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.”

    - Mitch McConnell, Feb. 2016


    Gee, I wonder if he'll stick to the precedent he and the rest of his party set in 2016. Haha who am I kidding
     
    sirronstuff and Helljumper like this.
  4. revgen

    revgen - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,833
    Likes Received:
    4,203
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Unless you believe Biden is going to be elected, there won't be a new president after this election. You'd have to wait 4 more years for that to happen. So we're supposed to have 8 Supreme Court justices until Trump is no longer president? Absolutely laughable.
     
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2020
    sirronstuff and John3:16 like this.
  5. KareemtheGreat33

    KareemtheGreat33 - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    11,782
    Likes Received:
    23,911
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Brow-beater
    Location:
    Las Islas Filipinas
    Offline


    :Laugh:j****** troll
     
    JohnnyComeLately2k6 and revgen like this.
  6. KareemtheGreat33

    KareemtheGreat33 - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    11,782
    Likes Received:
    23,911
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Brow-beater
    Location:
    Las Islas Filipinas
    Offline


    gang raper ACB:LLLLLebronlaughing:she touched me!!! Reeeee!!!
     
  7. John3:16

    John3:16 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    6,590
    Likes Received:
    15,642
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    CEO - Big Baller Brand
    Offline
    "Elections have consequences and we won."
    -- President Obama

    "Soon to be 6 to 3."
    - President Trump. Probably
     
    sirronstuff likes this.
  8. John3:16

    John3:16 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    6,590
    Likes Received:
    15,642
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    CEO - Big Baller Brand
    Offline
    FB_IMG_1600542749287.jpg

    That didn't age well.
     
    sirronstuff likes this.
  9. Savory Griddles

    Savory Griddles Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Messages:
    9,152
    Likes Received:
    22,367
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I mean, the way votes have gone recently, Robert's will make it 5-4.
     
    revgen and John3:16 like this.
  10. 432J

    432J - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    6,897
    Likes Received:
    15,264
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Online
    John3:16 likes this.
  11. John3:16

    John3:16 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    6,590
    Likes Received:
    15,642
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    CEO - Big Baller Brand
    Offline
    ^^ the beauty of the hypocrisy from both sides is knowing the GOP did, and will, win this. Dems were better off staying true to their past position. Gonna lose. Might as well stay consistent.
     
  12. 432J

    432J - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    6,897
    Likes Received:
    15,264
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Online
    The GOP plays by their own rules and bends them as it suits them. Nothing the dems can do in this case except hope they can get some GOP senators to flip. Romney and Murkowski seem like they will, no other safe bets aside from those two.

    If they're gonna push a nominee through after preaching the exact opposite in 2016, then the dems better pack the court if they win the WH and senate. But it's the dems so they'll just go nothing while the GOP continues to play dirty
     
  13. KareemtheGreat33

    KareemtheGreat33 - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    11,782
    Likes Received:
    23,911
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Brow-beater
    Location:
    Las Islas Filipinas
    Offline
    :Laugh:you want to appoint judges? Win elections.-Cocaine Mitch
     
    revgen and John3:16 like this.
  14. revgen

    revgen - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,833
    Likes Received:
    4,203
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Mitch is doing what he promised GOP donors that he would do. Stack the courts with conservative judges. You think the Dems won't do the same thing if they were in his position? Both parties serve the donor class. Harry Reid removed the filibuster in 2013 so the Dems could do the same thing Mitch is doing now. Ginsberg was 80 years old that year. She should have retired and allowed Obama to appoint her successor. In eight years, Obama only appointed 2 supreme court justices. Trump is on his way to appoint 3 justices in 4 years.
     
    Last edited: Sep 20, 2020
    John3:16 likes this.
  15. John3:16

    John3:16 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    6,590
    Likes Received:
    15,642
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    CEO - Big Baller Brand
    Offline
  16. KareemtheGreat33

    KareemtheGreat33 - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    11,782
    Likes Received:
    23,911
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Brow-beater
    Location:
    Las Islas Filipinas
    Offline
  17. Savory Griddles

    Savory Griddles Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Messages:
    9,152
    Likes Received:
    22,367
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    C'mon man. Both sides play dirty. If this situation was reversed they'd be doing the exact same thing. Let's not pretend one side is a beacon of righteousness while the other are Nazis. Both sides play dirty. Both sides suck.
     
  18. KareemtheGreat33

    KareemtheGreat33 - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    11,782
    Likes Received:
    23,911
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Brow-beater
    Location:
    Las Islas Filipinas
    Offline
  19. KareemtheGreat33

    KareemtheGreat33 - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    11,782
    Likes Received:
    23,911
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Brow-beater
    Location:
    Las Islas Filipinas
    Offline
    Who did it first? The Biden Rule LMAO
     
  20. jlkr

    jlkr - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2015
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    198
    Trophy Points:
    33
    Occupation:
    old fart
    Location:
    the bar
    Offline
    I'm not normally a fan of Karl Denninger and his Market Ticker blog. But this one fits to a T.

    I'll call this an "own goal" on the Democrats' part. She should have allowed Obama to appoint her successor and then the Democrats wouldn't be in this fix now.

    The Democrats are stuck making mostly empty threats as there is zero precedent, that's right, zero precedent in US history for a President and a Senate majority of the same party to not nominate and confirm a new Justice in the year of a presidential election.

    Court packing? One ought to study what happened the last time that was attempted. In 1936, FDR and the Democrats enjoyed an unprecedented landslide election outcome that saw them controlling both Houses with veto-proof and filibuster-proof majorities. So FDR in his pride and hubris thought the moment was right for striking back at the Supreme Court that had knocked down some of his more radical programs during his previous term. He announced his proposal just days after his inauguration in 1937 and it was almost literally dead on arrival as many in his own party as well as the opposition came out against it. By summer that year, FDR was forced to give up on it, but the damage was done as the Republicans stormed back in the 1938 midterm elections and came close to taking control back.
     
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2020
    KareemtheGreat33 and revgen like this.

Share This Page