Kyle Kuzma Discussion: Wizard

Discussion in 'NBA Discussion' started by therealdeal, Jun 22, 2017.

  1. svtzr

    svtzr - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2016
    Messages:
    2,668
    Likes Received:
    7,130
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    To me that’s easy to say in hindsight. But it’s a Kuzma thread and I suggest we don’t worry about it and detail the thread. Ingram is gone and no use getting caught up on woulda, shoulda, coulda’s.
     
  2. Khmrp

    Khmrp - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2016
    Messages:
    12,084
    Likes Received:
    13,820
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    you the one who brought up Ingram :Laugh:
     
    LTLakerFan likes this.
  3. Savory Griddles

    Savory Griddles Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Messages:
    9,152
    Likes Received:
    22,367
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Yeah. Ingram was the only player on our roster that had a chance to be an all-star. There's no way we could have kept him. And as Khmrp pointed out, the main objective after trading AD was to open up another max slot. Ingram's salary (while small) was still too much to make that happen.

    Obviously keeping Ingram over Kuz would have been amazing. I'm not sure if anyone on this board, given the choice, would have elected to keep Kuzma over Ingram. But the fact that every person on this board knew Ingram was better than Kuzma...the Pelicans obviously knew too. If it was an option to keep Ingram over Kuzma, then obviously we should have done that and gone hard after DeAngelo Russell with the smaller max slot. But it was never really an option.
     
  4. LaVarBallsDad

    LaVarBallsDad - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    16,172
    Likes Received:
    31,056
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Kuzma and his inconsistency is so frustrating, man....
     
    Pioneer10 and Cookie like this.
  5. 432J

    432J - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    6,833
    Likes Received:
    15,161
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    who says they didn't try to include kuzma in the deal instead of BI and NO turned it down?
     
  6. LaVarBallsDad

    LaVarBallsDad - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    16,172
    Likes Received:
    31,056
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
  7. fabfourlakers

    fabfourlakers - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2014
    Messages:
    3,572
    Likes Received:
    8,138
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    This is on Vogel - these last 5 games showed that Kuzma can play if we give him the freedom to handle the ball and make plays - but we're not doing that for him.

    You need to give Kuzma opportunities to do that stuff - you can't always put him with LeBron or AD - heck, don't put him with JUST AD ever - that doesn't work.

    We need to re-watch that OKC game and see how we played Kuzma in that game and then try and replicate that during the non-LeBron and non-AD minutes.

    Let Kuzma go PnR with Dwight...let Kuzma go in the post - let Kuzma CREATE- we need to develop him in that area. We keep putting him in lineups with effing Rondo wtf do you think is gonna happen?

    So sick of this man - Kuzma can PLAY - and instead, we might end up trading him for efffing Derrick Rose because we couldn't figure out how to use him
     
  8. sirronstuff

    sirronstuff - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    31,625
    Likes Received:
    76,938
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Your time is running out Ham
    Location:
    Laker Purgatory
    Offline
    Watch us just let him go somewhere else and see him put up Ingram numbers

    SMH

    I hope they can figure it out
     
  9. wallangong

    wallangong - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    1,607
    Likes Received:
    4,870
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    There were several times where Kuzma had solid looks at the basket, but then tried to do too much and overpassed. Sit him down and tell him to score. That is his job when he goes out on the court and right now for whatever reason he's trying too hard to create for others.
     
    lakerjones and sirronstuff like this.
  10. sirronstuff

    sirronstuff - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    31,625
    Likes Received:
    76,938
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Your time is running out Ham
    Location:
    Laker Purgatory
    Offline
    his teammates have basically said that's what they are trying to get him to do

    we'll see how this works out. Some great signs, and some great stinkers along the way. Wouldn't be the first time we used a player wrong.
     
  11. Kenzo

    Kenzo - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    7,611
    Likes Received:
    15,939
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Poland
    Offline
    Listening to his interviews, looking at his wardrobe and hair, he doesn't strike me as the sharpest tool in the shed. Maybe that's the problem. He tries to think on the court, when he should just play ball.
     
  12. JSM

    JSM - Lakers Legend -

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    18,002
    Likes Received:
    69,789
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    On a bad team, he definitely will. And that's fine. He just is such a horrible fit with this team, it's painful to watch. If he does put up those BI numbers, I hope people don't overreact and realize that was never going to happen here.
     
    sirronstuff likes this.
  13. JSM

    JSM - Lakers Legend -

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    18,002
    Likes Received:
    69,789
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    He can ball. No doubt. When he wants. And never with AD. And if he's not getting buckets, he's typically not doing anything else. That inconsistency and incompatibility means he has to get gone. Whether it's in the next two weeks or this time next year.

    If you can get Rose for the next year 1/2, I do it without any hesitation. Yes, there's injury concerns, but he is putting up numbers similar to his MVP season for $7m and change. If people call Kuz a bargain, that's a hijacking. It pushed Rondo much further down the rotation and gives us the ability to sit Bron (buying him more seasons with us) and not have the ball completely stop.

    Both are "rentals" because I don't think either will be here still after their contract is up. And so what if in that process Rose does give hurt? I'd rather make that sacrifice than continuing to burn out Bron and risk him injuring himself.

    I'll settle for Collison. Happily. That's assuming he's in game shape and hasn't lost a step. But let's be clear, that is settling. The other option is killing it and the biggest difference between now and the last time D Rose put up these kind of numbers, he has a J now. But in the case we go with Collison, I still look for a wing upgrade by moving Kuz. Ideally we can get Rose and Morris, I just don't see how to make that work with our available contracts.
     
    TIME likes this.
  14. Sentient Meat

    Sentient Meat - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2019
    Messages:
    946
    Likes Received:
    604
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Offline
    Didn't Rose recently move into their starting rotation?

    The only way they'd trade him to us is if they had inside information that he was going to be chronically injured imo

    He's one of their best players from what I can see... he was only on the bench to provide a catalyst for the second unit.
     
  15. JSM

    JSM - Lakers Legend -

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    18,002
    Likes Received:
    69,789
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    It's all depending on if they find a deal for Drummond. They're still shopping him, even after things fell apart with the Hawks. If they do that, they're committing to the rebuild and a lost season. Rose will be wasting away there if that happens.
     
    sirronstuff and Sentient Meat like this.
  16. sirronstuff

    sirronstuff - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    31,625
    Likes Received:
    76,938
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Your time is running out Ham
    Location:
    Laker Purgatory
    Offline
    It stinks to watch our good talent go away though because they are a poor fit with a system heavily designed a single aging player that really dictates how our system runs.

    The practical side of me looks at that objectively and thinks it's a poor risk. Put limited skill/specialty skill pieces around a 35 year old back of prime superstar with high mileage, run him 35 minutes a game, have him play perhaps the most taxing position in the league, ship out all of your developing talent, and have very little in the pipeline if it falls apart.

    LeBron is a great player, but is this a 2 year run? 1 year? I can't imagine 3 yet. We have some talent in the G League, but our roster has holes, and our two big aces won't always come through in the clutch. Do we have the right pieces around those 2?

    Are the holes in our roster less than other teams, or can we overcome them? We very well might, and I guess that's what makes this game great. You have to play the games. When it counts, who will step up in a tight match and who will falter. We have way too many unknowns on this team to know for sure.
     
    ElginTheGreat likes this.
  17. lakerjones

    lakerjones Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    10,685
    Likes Received:
    31,802
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    La La land
    Offline
    Kuz has been making this a harder decision than I would have thought. Great games followed by stinkers. He's making equal cases to keep him and to trade him lately.

    I really thought it was pretty cut and dried to keep him at his salary point and with little chance of getting a better player back in return.
     
    ElginTheGreat likes this.
  18. CarolinaLakerFan

    CarolinaLakerFan - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2014
    Messages:
    1,922
    Likes Received:
    5,972
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    South Carolina
    Offline
    Annoying as his game is, i just don’t see how trading Kuz makes us better. We’re depleted enough at the wing position as it currently is. We need additional talent without losing what we already have.
     
    lakerjones and ElginTheGreat like this.
  19. LTLakerFan

    LTLakerFan - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    36,428
    Likes Received:
    60,614
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    So Cal
    Offline
    You're introspective today. What's going on? You're not in your feelings are you? Stop it and make us laugh?


    :Laugh:
     
  20. D-Fish Man

    D-Fish Man - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2014
    Messages:
    1,690
    Likes Received:
    5,765
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Offline
    I feel you man, but isn't that just another way of saying "he's inconsistent?"

    All these guys are exceptional basketball players, that's why they're in the NBA. Even guys like Mbenga had the occasional night (okay, maybe not Mbenga). But what separates the mice from the men is the ability to set a standard, and consistently reach it every night, with the few exceptions that prove the rule. 3rd year is make-or-break IMO and Kuz just isn't proving to be reliable. It stinks but it's becoming undeniable.
     
    Cookie likes this.

Share This Page