Random Other NBA Teams Discussion

Shame that was a 2 man draft. KAT and then the surprise was Booker.

 

wasn't murray #6 or 7 in that draft, too?

 

That was the following year, the BI draft. Other highlights: Simmons, Brown, Sabonis.

But Murray still took the matchup against us and Russell personally for years.

 

Meanwhile the Warriors....



And Lebron tried copying the Nets....Fit/Chemistry/Continuity is so important






Also this stat is startling. This is why I think it will be a Bucks vs Warriors Finals

 

A lot of interesting playoff storylines this season, especially with there not being a clear cut contender. Can’t wait for the season to end so that I can enjoy playoff basketball

 

yeah, anyone but sixers/clippers/C Bags, and there should be some tight contests along the way.

very curious to see how memphis does in its first attempt with such a young roster.

 

Go Memphis. Am sure Ja has done the exercises AD hasn’t yet learned (or LeBron for that matter after 2 decades in the League) to protect him from any sprained ankles with his game played so high in the air. Someone used him as an example a few weeks back. No s*** happens for that guy.

:THT Heart Hands:

 

might have been me, but it's a matter of time for high flyers. all of them get hurt. ja also doesn't shy away from contact a la iverson, which leads to long-term wear and tear. enjoy him while you can! one thing that helps is that he's light. people want to know why AD's ankle sprains are worse--he weighs 80lbs more and still moves quickly/jumps high. that's a lot more force on the joint. it's why shaq's prime was relatively short for an all-timer and zion's may not exist.

 

he just hasn't been able to stay on the floor, right? seemed like he was going to be a bigger dwight powell, which is pretty good.

 

MIL - MEM Finals, a dream scenario
Please God, let ma have anything this year...

 

lol, david stern would rise from the grave to fix one or both of the conference finals.

 

i'd like to complain about the play-in again.

minnesota is 8 games better than the 8-seed clippers and 10 games better than the other two play-in teams. how should it be fair that they could miss the playoffs by losing two games. why should the 7 seed even be up for grabs with that kind of difference?

there needs to be a record-discrepancy trigger on the play-in. otherwise, a team like minnesota, who was MUCH better throughout the season, just gets their regular season completely thrown out. they shouldn't even be able to drop a spot. that's the difference between drawing first-time playoff team grizzlies and drawing the team that just mopped up the league for an entire season and went to the finals last year. all because, say, marcus morris goes nuts from three for one game or something. just terrible.

 

The play in worked for the bubble because of the weird season… and it was also a bit different as well. It “worked” last year because Lakers and Warriors drew attention. This year its bad and hopefully they tweak it.

in the bubble it was just the 8th seed up for grabs and you had to be within a certain range record wise to be considered. We should go back to that.

I’d like to also add at least being above .500 but thats less likely

 

Agree with this, thought the same this morning.

Game difference is a must.
I think there's benefits, it's an extra element of excitement and teams in #9 to #11 or 12 remain competitive longer, so I think the play-in came to stay. Especially because it's also some extra games so extra revenues. Just needs some tweaks.

I think the Wolves still make it. Don't see any of Pels/Spurs beating them, but yeah is just one game, and if they lose the 1st they get a season ending matchup with the best team in the league.

On the other side I see Cavs missing it, even with Mobley and Allen coming back. They are only 2.5 games away of the 10th seed, but also only 9 of the #1

 

i forgot that the initial version DID have a range restriction! why would you dump that when you made it permanent?!

anyway, no, i don't see minny losing both, but it could happen. i mean, teams lose a couple games to inferior teams all the time. the argument that that means they weren't good enough is silly, imo. you're just devaluing the regular season games even more.

again, reggie jackson has his one stellar game in 5, and now you're facing the suns at best! i'd be super pissed.