Anthony Davis Discussion: Only Player On Both All NBA + All Def

Discussion in 'Lakers Discussion' started by vasashi17, Sep 23, 2018.

  1. Sentient Meat

    Sentient Meat - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2019
    Messages:
    946
    Likes Received:
    604
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Offline
    We overpaid for a scoring Ben Wallace.

    AD is great but the only recent player worth all those assets was maybe young LBJ or young and healthy KD.

    You say he does 37 things well and doesn't do 39 things but that's like saying you have a car with nice paint, early warning system, good cupholders, airbags, seat belts, bumpers, windshield wipers etc, but doesn't have the speed to win a race or a driver with the killer instinct and nerves of steel.

    The ability to close and lead teams to victory is the most important part about being a great player... Otherwise you are Pau or Bosh.

    Now if we combined him with young LBJ or Dame or healthy Kawhi, then I'd say we were in good shape. But that will never happen now because we managed to get rid of Julius, DLO, Nance, Clarkson, LouWill, BI, Lonzo, Hart, Thomas Bryant, Zubac, Bonga, Svi, Mo, #4 pick, two future firsts, other second round picks.

    It's a breathtaking amount of assets to lose for one great player in their prime and one great who is getting old.

    It sounds good on paper to have two top five players but considering AD has never been able to win by himself it's taking a huge leap of faith to imagine he suddenly will be able to replace a declining LBJ.

    Even his most ardent supporters admit that isn't who he is.

    Title winning duos?

    A young LBJ/AD combo... yes
    A Dame/AD combo... yes
    A healthy Kawhi/AD combo... yes
    A Jimmy Butler/AD combo... maybe

    An old LBJ/AD combo... maybe this year but that's probably it.

    Competing for a title for one year wasn't worth losing those 16 assets. We aren't desperate Cleveland... We are the Lakers. We gave up everything for LBJ's window not ours. I can't argue that we were poor but I think were at the verge of a breakthrough before Klutch took over.

    Maybe some of you think making the playoffs was worth the price after six years of failure. If we were some obscure small market like OKC or New Orleans maybe I'd agree. I just disagree that we had to make this move right now. Sure maybe we'd miss the playoffs one or two more years... doubtful with LBJ, but the worst case scenario would be that he wasted his time. Instead, he may have given us one false dawn in exchange for another period of hardship.

    It's ironic that you've championed AD so much while also admitting that you most likely need the scoring wings to win the title.

    You give up that much for Jordan, not Pippen.
     
  2. TIME

    TIME Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    5,787
    Likes Received:
    22,652
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Lifelong Lakers fan.
    Location:
    LaLa Land
    Offline
    Nothing like bending the facts to fit your agenda. You just claimed we "got rid of" 16+ players for AD. That's just a ridiculous claim that you just made up out of thin air. I don't want to write a book refuting your claim, so here's the short response. The goal was to sign LeBron, sign Kawhi and trade for AD. The FO had been given strong indicators that all three were going to happen. The roster turnover was an effort to make that happen. Every GM in the league would have moved those players listed above in order to acquire those three players. You disagree with that plan, and that's your prerogative. But you can't manipulate the facts and leave out LeBron and Kawhi from the story of why those players aren't here anymore.

    Julius, DLO, Nance, Clarkson, LouWill, Thomas Bryant, Bonga, Mo = clearing cap space for LeBron and then Kawhi.
    Svi was Magic's decision to go for a more mature 3 point shooter which didn't work out.
    Zu was Magic's decision to jettison to get a stretch 5 which didn't work out.

    None of the above were gotten rid of to acquire AD. How can you not understand that?
     
  3. Sentient Meat

    Sentient Meat - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2019
    Messages:
    946
    Likes Received:
    604
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Offline
    I've said a hundred times if LBJ was young I'd understand it. I don't understand doing it for one year or two years of prime LBJ.

    Of course I get that all assets weren't for AD... but if one player is expiring then it ends up becoming one superstar hopefully later than sooner.

    On one hand Abeer is saying there are no great scoring wings available, on the other hand we are going to magically sign one with no assets when LBJ retires?

    Either there are good wing options available and we could have signed one eventually or there aren't any.

    I suppose people will say this year there weren't. Well part of the due diligence in divesting oneself of all those assets is making sure you have at least a few verbal agreements with said targets in advance.

    It was too many assets and hopefully one day people will realize I'm on the side of Laker fans and not the enemy.
     
  4. TIME

    TIME Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    5,787
    Likes Received:
    22,652
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Lifelong Lakers fan.
    Location:
    LaLa Land
    Offline
    You just disregarded my response. Will you acknowledge that we did NOT get rid of 16+ players to acquire AD?

    It was never for one or two years of LeBron. It was for however long LeBron could play at a high level and then have AD + Kawhi as the core to build around going forward.
     
    lakerjones likes this.
  5. Sentient Meat

    Sentient Meat - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2019
    Messages:
    946
    Likes Received:
    604
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Offline
    Where did I say we gave away 16 players to acquire AD. I said we divested 16 assets to sign old LBJ and AD.
    If LBJ was young it makes some sense... since he's old it ultimately becomes 1 player pretty quickly.
     
  6. TIME

    TIME Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    5,787
    Likes Received:
    22,652
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Lifelong Lakers fan.
    Location:
    LaLa Land
    Offline
    "We overpaid for a scoring Ben Wallace.

    AD is great but the only recent player worth all those assets was maybe young LBJ or young and healthy KD."

    It's how you started your post. But, even if you didn't mean all 16 were just for AD, you are still leaving the plan to acquire Kawhi out of your list. That's why I listed for you above what each player was moved for.
     
    lakerjones likes this.
  7. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    27,655
    Likes Received:
    74,677
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Wow. Just wow. I’ll take Ben Wallace with Rasheed Wallace’s offensive game.

    you take...all your assets. I win. Proof is already in the pudding.
     
    gcclaker likes this.
  8. Sentient Meat

    Sentient Meat - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2019
    Messages:
    946
    Likes Received:
    604
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Offline
    I agree I was unclear so I will concede that to you.

    But I've posted enough that most know what I meant by that.

    I'm sorry but I can't give credit for the Kawhi moves because they were done at the last minute.

    Is that more excusable because of that?... sure... but it wasn't good planning imo.
     
  9. TIME

    TIME Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    5,787
    Likes Received:
    22,652
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Lifelong Lakers fan.
    Location:
    LaLa Land
    Offline
    Who says they were done at the last minute? That was an uninformed media speculation that was later proven false. Either way, it doesn't change the point. Your 16+ player narrative is just wrong for the reason you stated in the first post.
     
    lakerjones and LTLakerFan like this.
  10. LakerFanIam

    LakerFanIam - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2014
    Messages:
    1,776
    Likes Received:
    5,173
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    You do know that the Lakers get some serious cap relief after LeBron goes, right..?
    & AD will still be in his prime. I love BI, Zo & Hart, but AD is one of the Top 10 Players in this League.
    Can't believe we're still debating this trade.
     
    lakerjones, alam1108 and abeer3 like this.
  11. Sentient Meat

    Sentient Meat - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2019
    Messages:
    946
    Likes Received:
    604
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Offline
    If LBJ leaves in a timely manner, and AD signs with us long term, then yes it can still end well.

    If he stays too long past his expiration date that could neutralize two or three years of AD's prime.

    It wasn't just BI, Zo, and Hart... it's losing almost everyone that has us struggling to find spare parts.

    I can't believe people are still defending the price when we are agreeing about the holes.

    Acquiring AD... good

    Losing almost everyone... not optimal.
     
  12. KareemtheGreat33

    KareemtheGreat33 - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    11,587
    Likes Received:
    23,554
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Brow-beater
    Location:
    Las Islas Filipinas
    Offline
    We have our 1st round pick this year, I'm sure our talent evaluators will do a good job with that pick.
     
  13. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    27,655
    Likes Received:
    74,677
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    and we have a top 10 nba player in his prime.

    the only player we lost that isn't easily replaceable at MLE or less is ingram. seriously, not a big deal.
     
  14. Savory Griddles

    Savory Griddles Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Messages:
    9,152
    Likes Received:
    22,367
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    So I saw this line first and then went up and read the post you were applying to and quickly realized you were talking about Anthony freaking Davis. So he's a souped up Ben Wallace...got it.

    We couldn't have overpaid for him. We just couldn't have since none of the kids were generational talents. AD is a generational talent.

    You are not only the only person on this board beating this drum, no one in the media is beating this drum. No GM would beat this drum. A lot of people are saying he's a top 10 player in the league. No. He's top 5. Gianis, Lebron, Kawhi and...???

    You have an opinion that is against the grain. I'm glad not everyone agrees with everyone on this board. That would get boring. But I just can't understand this one. Would I have liked to have kept Ingram in the trade? Obviously. But Lebron/Ingram/Ball/Hart/Garland?/Kuzma wasn't going to win anything. That supporting cast with some nice veterans around them in Reddick and Holiday is 11 games below .500.
     
  15. LakerFanIam

    LakerFanIam - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2014
    Messages:
    1,776
    Likes Received:
    5,173
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Just couldn't disagree more..
    You're banking on BI or Zo ever becoming anything close to LeBron or AD.. (not happening, btw)
    What other pieces did we lose that we didn't replace with Players with more Playoff experience...?
    Don't say draft picks, cuz those can always be acquired, & this Team has a helluva lot fewer "holes" than we've had over the past 5-6 Years.
    Give me this Team over potential any Day...
     
  16. LTLakerFan

    LTLakerFan - Lakers Legend -

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    36,084
    Likes Received:
    60,055
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    So Cal
    Online
    Who were you planning on paying their going market rate, once ALL those guys got to their better basketball versions the next one or two years? Cause once you start maxing them and over paying to keep them it doesn't look so rosy does it if you're STILL not winning a ring? Oh, what's that? They become assets to trade, and hope you bring in someone better with more championship GRIT?
     
    abeer3 and Weezy like this.
  17. LTLakerFan

    LTLakerFan - Lakers Legend -

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    36,084
    Likes Received:
    60,055
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    So Cal
    Online
    Come on now don't be shy about standing up for your opinion. Give yourself the proper multiple here. 4x? 6x? 8x?


    :Woozyshaq:
     
    abeer3 and sirronstuff like this.
  18. LTLakerFan

    LTLakerFan - Lakers Legend -

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    36,084
    Likes Received:
    60,055
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    So Cal
    Online
    Oh bleep here we go again with this NONSENSE of yours. This was the last time I got really irked with you posting. What a clownish statement. What a dumb statement.
     
  19. The Rock

    The Rock - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2014
    Messages:
    2,939
    Likes Received:
    7,439
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    He's facing the same challenge that Pau Gasol faced. He needs to play tougher and be ok with taking the punishment physically on offense and defense. If he cannot do that we will not win a ring. This mid range stuff isn't going to work in the playoffs
     
  20. sirronstuff

    sirronstuff - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    31,360
    Likes Received:
    76,465
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Your time is running out Ham
    Location:
    Laker Purgatory
    Offline
    White Swan

    he should feel extra insulted by that
     
    Cookie likes this.

Share This Page