Julius Randle Discussion: Beast, Ox, Monster, Lotus Flower

Discussion in 'Lakers Discussion' started by DjBelvedere, Oct 7, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 33 of 64
  1. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I disagree that Randle moving to SF is anything bad.

    1. We need him to start shooting jumpers anyway to space now for Okafor (and in the short term, Kobe).
    2. He's got the ability to do it, so I'm not certain I see the downside.
    3. He plays SF in name, but that doesn't mean he can't pick and choose his spots like he was doing before his injury.
    4. Trade him? Why are people so desperate to get rid of him? We've got a Young Dynasty developing here. Embrace it.

    The only reason to move Randle to the SF spot though is so that you can sign any of the big men in free agency. If we've got a shot at Gasol or Jordan or Aldridge or Love, then sure slide Randle up. Otherwise, have him as a match-up nightmare at PF and be happy with it.
     
    therealdeal, May 22, 2015
    #641
    Barnstable, TIME, karacha and 3 others like this.
  2. tada

    tada - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2014
    Messages:
    4,467
    Likes Received:
    8,535
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Good thoughtful post. If he were to develop that jumpshot, do you think he would become a match-up nightmare at SF as well?
     
    tada, May 22, 2015
    #642
  3. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I mean yes and no. He's a match-up nightmare no matter position he plays because he can beat you so many ways. The issue at SF becomes can he beat you up inside enough to win games? If he's inside then where are our PF and C at? Are they capable of hitting jumpshots if called upon? In some situations I think it'd be fine.

    I think if we started a game with Randle/Aldridge/Okafor it'd work fine for a few minutes, but eventually the paint would just utterly collapse.
     
    therealdeal, May 22, 2015
    #643
    tada likes this.
  4. tada

    tada - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2014
    Messages:
    4,467
    Likes Received:
    8,535
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I feel Randle is alot more dangerous when he faces up, as opposed to having his back to the basket. I've seen alot of plays where he wildly misses the basket when he posts up and backs down the defender. When he faces up and drives, he scores at a high rate.

    So I'm starting to feel like he should play like Lebron. He obviously doesn't have the play-making ability, so with more cutting/slashing, attacking the rim, fully utilizing his speed and strength.
     
    tada, May 22, 2015
    #644
    TIME and LTLakerFan like this.
  5. Battle Tested20

    Battle Tested20 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    9,213
    Likes Received:
    24,866
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Technical Data Analyst
    Location:
    Fair Oaks, CA
    Offline
    ^ Exactly. When he faces up that's when he puts the most pressure on the defense. He does this and the defender always takes a step back. Saw it in summer league and preseason all the time
     
    Battle Tested20, May 22, 2015
    #645
    TIME, tada and LTLakerFan like this.
  6. tada

    tada - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2014
    Messages:
    4,467
    Likes Received:
    8,535
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    So then, is he most effective when he starts his offense out in the perimeter?
     
    tada, May 22, 2015
    #646
  7. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    He's most effective facing up at about 14-17 feet and taking his man off the dribble. He can still very effective post up though when the situation calls for it.
     
    therealdeal, May 22, 2015
    #647
    tada likes this.
  8. John3:16

    John3:16 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    6,590
    Likes Received:
    15,641
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    CEO - Big Baller Brand
    Offline
    I saw something on FB saying their was a proposed deal: Lakers get Melo. Knicks get #2 and Randle. I got a good laugh off it. Had to have been created by a Knick fan (although I've never met one in person).
     
    John3:16, May 22, 2015
    #648
    Ryanwestlombardi likes this.
  9. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    If Phil called and offered that, I think Mitch would ask him never to call again.
     
    therealdeal, May 22, 2015
    #649
    Ryanwestlombardi, tada and John3:16 like this.
  10. John3:16

    John3:16 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    6,590
    Likes Received:
    15,641
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    CEO - Big Baller Brand
    Offline
    Would you do #2 and Randle for #4 and Melo ?
     
    John3:16, May 22, 2015
    #650
  11. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Hell to the no.

    Within 2-3 years Okafor or Towns/Randle will be better than Carmelo/Mudiay or whoever they get. Hell they might be better next season even.
     
    therealdeal, May 22, 2015
    #651
    Ryanwestlombardi, Helljumper, tada and 1 other person like this.
  12. TIME

    TIME Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    5,799
    Likes Received:
    22,702
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Lifelong Lakers fan.
    Location:
    LaLa Land
    Offline
    I would not even do Randle for Melo straight up. Maybe if Kobe was 30 I would, but at this point we have to be future focused.
     
    TIME, May 22, 2015
    #652
    Ryanwestlombardi, Helljumper and Barnstable like this.
  13. KareemtheGreat33

    KareemtheGreat33 - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    11,710
    Likes Received:
    23,760
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Brow-beater
    Location:
    Las Islas Filipinas
    Offline
    Melo has trade value?
     
    KareemtheGreat33, May 22, 2015
    #653
    Ryanwestlombardi likes this.
  14. JSM

    JSM - Lakers Legend -

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    17,981
    Likes Received:
    69,695
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    If Melo could stay healthy. If we are all in for a must win now. If Melo could show that he's a winner and not just an empty stats guy. If Melo cared about something more than personal accomplishments for whatever weak a** legacy he'll have -- I lost a lot of respect for him playing just enough to make the all star game then shutting it down this year.

    If they want Lin, Hill, Swaggy P; I'd take Melo. But not for anything more than that. No future assets, not even any second round picks.
     
    JSM, May 22, 2015
    #654
  15. Battle Tested20

    Battle Tested20 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    9,213
    Likes Received:
    24,866
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Technical Data Analyst
    Location:
    Fair Oaks, CA
    Offline
    hell no
     
    Battle Tested20, May 22, 2015
    #655
    lakerjones, Ryanwestlombardi, tada and 1 other person like this.
  16. gcclaker

    gcclaker Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    8,993
    Likes Received:
    20,464
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Wherever I am at the moment...
    Offline
    ...or say nothing and just hang up.
     
    gcclaker, May 22, 2015
    #656
    Ryanwestlombardi likes this.
  17. tada

    tada - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2014
    Messages:
    4,467
    Likes Received:
    8,535
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    even Jeanie would hang up
     
    tada, May 23, 2015
    #657
    lakerjones, Ryanwestlombardi and LTLakerFan like this.
  18. Azndude2190

    Azndude2190 - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Messages:
    1,588
    Likes Received:
    3,919
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Randle is only 20, Clarkson is 22, and Towns/Okafor are both 19. That's some serious youth to build around and it bodes well for the Lakers long term. I would not trade for Melo who is 30 and is about a year or two away from the downside of his career.
     
    Azndude2190, May 23, 2015
    #658
    lakerjones, Ryanwestlombardi, LTLakerFan and 1 other person like this.
  19. Ryanwestlombardi

    Ryanwestlombardi - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2014
    Messages:
    467
    Likes Received:
    506
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Oregon
    Offline
    Having watched a lot of Warrior games this year my take on their great success is the move of Draymond Green in the lineup for Lee. He has that "it" factor despite being an undersized 4. The more I've watched him the more I start comparing Randle to him. Big Beefy quick intense players that can play D against 3, 4, and even 5s. Green can shoot the ball, something Randle with have to prove he can do. My hope is that this comparison will be a topic of discussion all next year.
     
    Ryanwestlombardi, May 23, 2015
    #659
    LTLakerFan likes this.
  20. LTLakerFan

    LTLakerFan - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    36,401
    Likes Received:
    60,568
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    So Cal
    Online
    Don't forget Sir Charles, with less hops but more height, and even better in the open court and all around handles than Chuck was. Probably not the rebounder since Chuck was elite.
     
    LTLakerFan, May 23, 2015
    #660
Page 33 of 64
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page