Paul George Discussion

Discussion in 'NBA Discussion' started by therealdeal, Feb 23, 2017.

  1. alam1108

    alam1108 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    13,585
    Likes Received:
    37,190
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Laker Land
    Offline
  2. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
  3. lakerfan2

    lakerfan2 - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2014
    Messages:
    5,220
    Likes Received:
    10,105
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Simi Valley
    Offline
    "we talked about him being here."

    "...for the rest of his contract and leaves for the Lakers."
     
    JohnnyComeLately2k6 and Kenzo like this.
  4. LTLakerFan

    LTLakerFan - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    36,410
    Likes Received:
    60,583
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    So Cal
    Online
    What's the consensus of how great of a player, barring serious injury, PG will become? Based on current skills, strengths and weaknesses and comparing him to a (hopefully) great wing position.... past NBA player. Kobe was his idol reportedly growing up, so what are the reports on his work ethic? He's got IT no question? A winner?
     
  5. lakerjones

    lakerjones Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    10,684
    Likes Received:
    31,795
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    La La land
    Offline
    I am not in favor of moving Russell but if I had to choose I'd keep Ingram and play him at the 1 if it came down to one or the other for George.
     
    Khmrp and LTLakerFan like this.
  6. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Here's the thing.

    George coming to LA is predicated on his desire to be here, correct? If we're trading for him, it's with the understanding that he wants to be here for the long-term otherwise all we're doing is sacrificing assets for a rental. However, we cannot make this move knowing 100% that George is going to sign an extension so for all intents and purposes, we're getting a rental. That limits what we should give up in a trade.

    So already, with the understanding we're trading for a player who is an expiring contract, any trade offers that include our Top 3 pick and several other assets are asinine from our perspective. If that's the cost it takes to get George, then it's empirically not worth it. It would make more sense in every scenario to use that assets for another player.

    I'm not in the business of being fair to Indiana. I know that the offer of Randle/Clarkson/Hou 1st is a low ball offer, but that's not really my problem. I understand that George wants out (and that may not be to us) and I'm going to take advantage of that. I'm not going to give up valuable assets that I can flip to other teams just to be "fair". Nobody is doing us favors in trades, I'm not helping them either. Indiana can either take that offer and start their rebuild or they call George's bluff and watch him walk away in the summer (either to us or to another, more competitive team). Now, if they want the Top pick, they'll have to take back a bad contract. End of story. If they want future draft picks, I'm willing to consider that because we should be in a better place in a few years and we'll be the ones giving away 20 something odd picks to be competitive.

    I don't give a rat's *** about what we might consider a "good" or "fair" offer to Indiana. This isn't a "good" or "fair" situation. George wants out and he's made it clear among the league he wants to come here. Nobody else is going to give up the farm for him, so I'm not either. That's just the reality of this market. If somebody is willing to beat Randle/Clarkson/Hou 1st (maybe future 1st) or Top 3/Deng then so be it. I'll take my chances in the summer of 2018.

    The whole point of this scenario was that we were going to have a shot at George without gutting the team. If you don't consider trading a Top 3 pick and Russell or a Top 3 pick Ingram or if you're considering trading Ingram and Randle and Clarkson etc. then you're missing the point of this. If it costs us too much to get George, then we're just going to have to stick to this rebuild and let it be what it is.
     
  7. tada

    tada - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2014
    Messages:
    4,467
    Likes Received:
    8,535
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I think he might have another gear offensively, which will put him in the 2000-04 TMac category. But he also might have peaked already.
     
  8. Battle Tested20

    Battle Tested20 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    9,213
    Likes Received:
    24,866
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Technical Data Analyst
    Location:
    Fair Oaks, CA
    Offline
    Ohh Pacers Fans,

    [​IMG]
     
    sirronstuff, ZenMaster, Kenzo and 2 others like this.
  9. LTLakerFan

    LTLakerFan - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    36,410
    Likes Received:
    60,583
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    So Cal
    Online
    [​IMG]
     
  10. Cookie

    Cookie The Dame of Doom Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2015
    Messages:
    4,335
    Likes Received:
    21,548
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    The market will decide what Paul is worth but he can certainly affect the offers by letting teams know he only wants to go to the Lakers. Boston or other teams can take a chance and hope they can convince him to stay but do they want to take that chance. I do think PG wants to come here but only if we don't have to give up too many assets.
     
  11. KRL

    KRL - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2016
    Messages:
    1,369
    Likes Received:
    1,190
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    It all depends on personnel. If PG played with a gifted Point guard like Ball he might score more with better looks .... thinking 26-28 ppg.

    If PG was the point forward in Luke's system and played with DLo and Ingram etc. I think he'll avg 6-7 ast while getting 22 ppg
     
  12. LTLakerFan

    LTLakerFan - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    36,410
    Likes Received:
    60,583
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    So Cal
    Online
    See this is where by-the-book-buttoned down-straight arrow Kupchak probably got screwed at times. Let's hope Rob the beast / shark Pelinka is working through the back channels with any and all forms of communication needed. As therealdeal mentioned last week ....( if Kobe is in this to help Jeanie, Magic and his homey Rob and the Lakers succeed) ...... yeah Kobe ought to be talking with PG and gathering accurate intel for the Lakers to know how serious he is. So they can lowball the Pacers or just wait for him. Shirley Paul doesn't want to the Lakers to gut the squad of its young talent to bring him in.
     
  13. Azndude2190

    Azndude2190 - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Messages:
    1,588
    Likes Received:
    3,919
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Yea, short of us fleecing the Pacers, I don't see/or want a trade to go down.

    I mean as obvious as that sounds...
     
    ZenMaster likes this.
  14. KRL

    KRL - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2016
    Messages:
    1,369
    Likes Received:
    1,190
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    It all comes down to All NBA 3rd team aka MONEY LOL
     
  15. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Sam Amick said recently it's not as much of a silver bullet as the media is assuming. George wants out regardless and the money is unlikely to change his mind.

    All that would change his mind is if Indiana can get competitive this summer which is unlikely.
     
  16. Punk-101

    Punk-101 - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    2,868
    Likes Received:
    7,847
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I was thinking this exact thing the other day.
    Lamar=Randle
    Clarkson=Caron
    Deng or Moz=Grant
    late 1st = late 1st

    Or am i way off on Lamar and Caron? I wasn't too impressed with them back them. Also, was Grant an expiring? I think he had 2 years left, maybe...
     
    tada likes this.
  17. Battle Tested20

    Battle Tested20 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    9,213
    Likes Received:
    24,866
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Technical Data Analyst
    Location:
    Fair Oaks, CA
    Offline
    :Laugh:


    Sure hope that "leak" is correct
     
    lakerjones likes this.
  18. KRL

    KRL - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2016
    Messages:
    1,369
    Likes Received:
    1,190
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I'd take LO and Caron over JC and JR everyday of the week!
     
    sirronstuff likes this.
  19. PGinLA

    PGinLA - Rookie -

    Joined:
    May 1, 2017
    Messages:
    728
    Likes Received:
    1,189
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Occupation:
    Cost Control Analyst
    Location:
    22423 Annepe Way, Chatsworth, CA
    Offline
    I agree with you in a way.

    PG has been playing on a defensive-minded Pacers in his first 4 years without a true point guard. That's why his offensive output is low. The last couple of years has been nothing short of brutal for him. No second option. No real point guard and when Teague came in, everything is new. The system, the brand of basketball all were being forced which he personally didn't like.

    My point is, yes he can score. He can play defense. He can be as good as anybody but the reason why everyone is sleeping on him and he cannot truly take off is because he's stuck with a team whose legacy is mediocrity.

    With a good system and a coach that gets him and his game, he can be way better. I know PG. Been a fan since his day 1 and have seen how he developed. I can be a little bias but hey, who isn't.

    His niche is midrange whether from hand off, assist or creating his own.
    He's a deadly three point shooter but only from spot up, catch and shoot or off the screen dribble pull up.
    He sucks in buzzer beaters. Not so kobesque, I know. But he's clutch. Like last 5 minutes delivering clutch.
    His defense is not how it was before primarily because of the leg injury.
    And he whines a lot. Whining could easily be his middle name.
    And he doesn't take a lot of shots.

    ---

    But before anyone can judge me for being a bandwagon, let me tell you one thing. Paul George got my interest for two-fold reasons, he's from LA and he is the 2nd biggest fan of Kobe, next to me.

    Sent from my E6533 using Tapatalk
     
  20. OX1947

    OX1947 - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2016
    Messages:
    8,276
    Likes Received:
    17,604
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    YUGE YUGE YUGE YUGE. 200 million is 200 million. It would have made it harder. Now, things are easier. This is step one of the lucky train. Lakers need one more in 2 weeks. If they get that top 3 pick (Hopefully the 3rd pick) then you trade for PG. Game, set, match.
     

Share This Page