2025-26 Team Developments: Trades / Free Agents / News / Rumors / Ideas

Discussion in 'Lakers Discussion' started by TIME, Jun 24, 2025.

  1. showtime24

    showtime24 - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2021
    Messages:
    1,858
    Likes Received:
    2,003
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Online
    Yeah, both of these guys conveniently have team options. So, Lakers could trade for them now, pick up their options and trade them later. I really don't like the fit with these guys though. People "talk themselves into" these type of players, like wit Westbrook.
     
  2. Garren04

    Garren04 - Rookie -

    Joined:
    May 11, 2019
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    198
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Offline
    I just don’t know. Hunter has been pretty bad this year and it very much decreases what you can do this upcoming offseason. Feels like one of those trades where two teams are both just swapping their problems.
     
    abeer3 likes this.
  3. KuzmoBall17

    KuzmoBall17 - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2017
    Messages:
    4,578
    Likes Received:
    8,082
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Online
  4. Kenzo

    Kenzo - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    8,078
    Likes Received:
    16,984
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Poland
    Offline
    Im all for it. Stay east u d******...
     
  5. Kobeluka99

    Kobeluka99 - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    May 19, 2025
    Messages:
    1,422
    Likes Received:
    1,206
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Only if the Lakers could help facilitate a deal for Gianiss. Like Kaminga ending up on the Lakers in a 3 team deal.

    something like that.

    but Minnesota makes no sense.

    Milwaukee is going to do the best deal for Milwaukee.
     
  6. Kobeluka99

    Kobeluka99 - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    May 19, 2025
    Messages:
    1,422
    Likes Received:
    1,206
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    If you’re weary of Gianiss next 4yr. 276 million dollar contract then you shouldn’t be in it.

    that’s why I only see us as the real alternative.

    Miamis gonna get a little shook.

    I know San Antonio don’t want that smoke. They gotta pay the kids. They already paying Fox.

    I know for a fact. Arod and Lorre don’t want that smoke. Cause they was already talking about the luxury tax. And they got Ant man. He gonna want some more money.

    Dolan knicks. I don’t know if they have enough. But he wouldn’t give a f***.

    I know Clay Bennett ain’t f***ing with that.

    it leaves us Golden State and New York.

    this would be mark Walter’s first big trade. It’s a gugenheim trade. He doesn’t care about a luxury tax. That satisfys Luka’s timeline. Rob Pelinkas white whale. As he’s playing coy with the media. Don’t rule out the Lakers don’t ever rule out the Lakers.

    Golden State has legs. Joe Lacob doesn’t give a f***. He has deep pockets. They gotta do it for Steph. They have the young players. Everybody talks s***. But if your Milwaukee do you value Reaves or Kaminga???

    New York is great for Gianiss but is that great for Milwaukee??? Towns dog s***. Mikal Bridges and OG nice compliment players. But not for Gianiss. Makes no sense. Austin Reaves is the superstar having his own team putting up his own numbers. You get picks.

    Knicks they don’t have their picks they gave those up for Mikal.

    Im just giving you the money side.
     
    sirronstuff likes this.
  7. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    32,364
    Likes Received:
    88,876
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    i actually don't think the money matters to anyone, tbh--except maybe SA, though even in their case, wemby missing so many games is going to luckily drop him down a salary tier in his first big contract (like SGA, who's about to get a huge salary jump despite just staying at his max).

    anyway, every team trading for him will be matching salary and thus staying exactly where they are.

    the issue is timelines, imo. i'm not as sure as you that luka and giannis are on the same timeline. i actually think giannis and curry are close, though (giannis has longer, but his game isn't going to age well). giannis and brunson are probably on about the same timeline, too. miami it doesn't matter because they don't have really have anyone, but bam is also basically right on giannis's timeline.

    we're seeing up close how difficult the two timeline thing is. gs kinda burned themselves on it already, so much so that if they miss the giannis swing, they closed both windows when they didn't move those picks a few years ago.

    so i still come down to gs and miami making the most sense. ny makes some sense, but only if they can spin off anunoby and bridges for prospects and picks milwaukee likes (i'm actually not sure they can).

    i don't think us or minny is a great match for several reasons.
     
    pika1708, Cookie and JSM like this.
  8. JSM

    JSM - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    20,554
    Likes Received:
    80,703
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    From a Cavs beat writer



    Don't like that packaging for Hunter.
     
  9. sk2408

    sk2408 - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2022
    Messages:
    1,819
    Likes Received:
    4,509
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Online
    I think the calculus is that he wouldn’t be all that hard to get off of in the summer because he is an expiring. Say right now the plan is to have like $50 million in cap space in the summer. Sign Ellis to like $10 million and Watson to an offer sheet of like $35 million. Now instead of $50 million space you have Hunter and $25 million in space. Still enough to sign Ellis. If you sign Watson to an offer sheet, and it turns out the Nuggets aren’t going to match, you trade Hunter to open the space back up. The other teams with cap space aren’t very attractive free agent destinations, so maybe they just absorb Hunter’s expiring at the cost of a protected pick or something. Would it be better to just have the space and not need to spend an asset to dump Hunter? Yeah, of course. But this way if you strike out with Watson you at least have a backup plan in Hunter that can basically give you what you’ve been getting in Rui and he’s an expiring you can flip before next deadline.

    I don’t think I like this btw, just trying to figure out the thought process behind it.
     
    TIME and abeer3 like this.
  10. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    32,364
    Likes Received:
    88,876
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    we add salary and maybe get worse. yipes.
     
    TIME, Savory Griddles and Cookie like this.
  11. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    32,364
    Likes Received:
    88,876
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    the backup plan to striking out in FA is to...absorb hunter and a pick.
     
    Cookie likes this.
  12. KareemtheGreat33

    KareemtheGreat33 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    13,018
    Likes Received:
    26,845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    The Don Consiglieri
    Location:
    Las Islas Filipinas
    Offline
    This would be horrible if true. Rui’s strength is three point shooting, Hunter is a three point misser, we have plenty of those
     
    abeer3 likes this.
  13. JSM

    JSM - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    20,554
    Likes Received:
    80,703
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
  14. karacha

    karacha Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    9,402
    Likes Received:
    30,513
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Hunter is a good player and a very versatile defender, no doubt. I’m just not sure this is the right/good deal for us.
     
  15. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    32,364
    Likes Received:
    88,876
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    upload_2026-1-30_11-49-55.png



    upload_2026-1-30_11-50-14.png

    rui to hunter is a marginal upgrade at absolute best (some would call it a downgrade) AND we lose a fair amount of flexibility.

    i see what cleveland would like it, but that's a hell no from me.

    maybe jj sees hunter as a younger DFS, but the DFS everyone pined for was substantially better than hunter:

    upload_2026-1-30_11-52-46.png
     
    52years likes this.
  16. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    32,364
    Likes Received:
    88,876
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    upload_2026-1-30_11-54-46.png

    i like this way more than a rui/hunter deal. we lose flexibility, but less of it, and we get to pre-agency ellis.

    and i'm not even nuts about this one, but the other...nope.
     
    Cookie, TIME and ElginTheGreat like this.
  17. JSM

    JSM - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    20,554
    Likes Received:
    80,703
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    If it's Hunter for Rui and DK, we better be getting a pick back (and David GD Putney) for getting them out of the 2nd apron next year

    Maybe that's the appeal and it gets us up to 4 picks we can move on draft night.
     
  18. sk2408

    sk2408 - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2022
    Messages:
    1,819
    Likes Received:
    4,509
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Online
    The Hunter rumor also mentioned the Nets being involved as a 3rd team. If it's not Hunter for Rui/Dalton but really Hunter/Sharpe/Highsmith for Rui/Dalton, that's a lot different. But I'm struggling to get the money to work in a 3-team trade that doesn't violate the aggregation thing because Cleveland is over the second apron.
     
    TIME likes this.
  19. Pioneer10

    Pioneer10 - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2019
    Messages:
    6,451
    Likes Received:
    17,696
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I absolute hate this move - just tell Lebron to retire and have Luka take this year and next year off if they make this move
    Cleveland better giving the Lakers a first to get off Hunter's deal and they get the better player in Rui

    Hunter has been absolutely atrocious - he's been worse than even the guys with no knees
    upload_2026-1-30_9-57-35.png
     
  20. Savory Griddles

    Savory Griddles Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Messages:
    9,218
    Likes Received:
    22,653
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    A Hunter trade feels like a desperation move by Pelinka to do something now. Hunter is not that guy. He is not worth giving up almost half our cap space this summer for a worse 3 point shooter than Rui and a small upgrade defensively.

    This is a move that potentially makes us worse.
     
    abeer3 likes this.

Share This Page