2022-23 Team Developments: News / Trades / Free Agents / Rumors

Discussion in 'Lakers Discussion' started by BangBoomPow, Jun 3, 2021.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ElginTheGreat

    ElginTheGreat - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    10,895
    Likes Received:
    30,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Could be but not a gamble I’d take especially with the current state of the team.
     
    lakerjones likes this.
  2. Weezy

    Weezy Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    18,571
    Likes Received:
    75,408
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Anaheim
    Offline
    So I’m guessing whoever gave Shams this info works for the Lakers, because no, we did have the salary to keep Caruso

     
    D-Fish Man likes this.
  3. JSM

    JSM - Lakers Legend -

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    18,001
    Likes Received:
    69,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
  4. lakerjones

    lakerjones Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    10,685
    Likes Received:
    31,802
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    La La land
    Offline
    Wow. Bummer indeed. We passed on Grant? Yikes. I can’t think of a better fit right now. Then I hope we don’t do some deal just to do it. Keep what we have then and hope that A. Nunn actually returns some time before the playoffs so he can get into the mix and B. THT improves.
     
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2022
    ElginTheGreat and abeer3 like this.
  5. KareemtheGreat33

    KareemtheGreat33 - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    11,716
    Likes Received:
    23,786
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Brow-beater
    Location:
    Las Islas Filipinas
    Offline
    In my desperation I’ll do the Russ THT Nunn and Wall Gordon, free up a spot
     
  6. Helljumper

    Helljumper - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    4,933
    Likes Received:
    14,677
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Offline


    Seems like Pincus “passed on” quote is being taken out of context.

    If anything, I’d guess it’s moreso that we’ve given up on our pursuit because we realize we can’t put together a package to meet what Detroit is looking for.

    Tried skimming through the podcast that the Pincus quote is from, couldn’t quite find that quote but did hear some interesting points from him regarding THT’s value.

    THT’s contract may actually lower his value in that he only has the rest of this season, next season, and then a player option. So even if a team is high on THT’s potential, if he lives up to that next year then he’s going to opt out and look for a big pay increase. Other teams are going to factor that in. Usually if you’re taking on a project type of player, you’d want them on a more cost controlled contract.
     
    pika1708, ElginTheGreat and abeer3 like this.
  7. Weezy

    Weezy Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    18,571
    Likes Received:
    75,408
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Anaheim
    Offline
    Yeah, we didn’t pass in that they agreed and we said no, he just reported we moved on. Remember though, this is the season of posturing, everyone is lying through the media that they aren’t interested in this or that, trying to not look desperate and such. Can’t really believe much of what you hear.
     
    Wino and D-Fish Man like this.
  8. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    28,026
    Likes Received:
    75,626
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    when i heard grant still wanted to be a focal point on offense, i passed. that's obviously not a winning strategy.

    and if i hear one more person trying to trade westbrook and THT for wall and gordon, i'm going to flip out. this does not improve our situation in any single way.

    no offense, kareem, but that's just the panic trade to end all panic trades. it checks zero boxes. it checks negative boxes.
     
    Juronimo, Wino, Barnstable and 11 others like this.
  9. svtzr

    svtzr - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2016
    Messages:
    2,668
    Likes Received:
    7,130
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Agreed Abeer!
     
    lakerjones and abeer3 like this.
  10. KareemtheGreat33

    KareemtheGreat33 - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    11,716
    Likes Received:
    23,786
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Brow-beater
    Location:
    Las Islas Filipinas
    Offline
    none taken, as I said desperation
     
    Barnstable, ElginTheGreat and abeer3 like this.
  11. JSM

    JSM - Lakers Legend -

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    18,001
    Likes Received:
    69,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline

    This is reassuring
     
    pika1708, Cookie, lakerjones and 3 others like this.
  12. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    28,026
    Likes Received:
    75,626
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    lol houston driving up the non-existent gordon market. he's paid 20 per through next year, and is a 33-year old small scoring guard who's trended down to slightly-above-replacement player value. but yeah, you can have our 1st rounder.
     
  13. VincePT

    VincePT - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2020
    Messages:
    1,010
    Likes Received:
    1,987
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    San Diego
    Offline
    Wall and Gordon would not really move the needle for us in my opinion

    that would be a desperate move and nothing else.
     
  14. lakerjones

    lakerjones Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    10,685
    Likes Received:
    31,802
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    La La land
    Offline
    Yeah that’s horrible.
     
    LTLakerFan likes this.
  15. JSM

    JSM - Lakers Legend -

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    18,001
    Likes Received:
    69,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I'd welcome either or both... if they're bought out, which isn't happening this year.

    I'm not comfortable with their injuries or with giving even more power to Klutch.

    Also we've struggled to build continuity with our lineups. Wall and Gordon would be too much to try and incorporate. Like I said earlier, I like Russ better because he's the devil you know.
     
  16. D-Fish Man

    D-Fish Man - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2014
    Messages:
    1,690
    Likes Received:
    5,765
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Offline
    Can someone please explain to me, like I'm 5-years old, why we'd even consider trading Westbrook for Wall, when his contract is just as cumbersome, and he's even more useless (i.e. not playing), and when doing so would mean giving up a pick or picks?
     
  17. NickthaQuick

    NickthaQuick - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2021
    Messages:
    1,608
    Likes Received:
    4,319
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    They would only consider that if they feel with Westbrook it gets to the point of being "addition by subtraction". Example - he can't handle being benched down the stretch of games and becomes a cancer. It's very unlikely however and Pelinka would be a fool to include a first.
     
    abeer3 likes this.
  18. Helljumper

    Helljumper - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    4,933
    Likes Received:
    14,677
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Offline
    I’ve been talked out of the idea by now, but if hypothetically we could do that trade WITHOUT giving up the first round pick … the rationale would be:

    • Holding the fact that the rebuilding Houston team doesn’t want to play Wall against him may be misleading. By all accounts Wall is healthy (or as healthy as someone his age who had major injuries a few years ago could be), and Klutch may have a better feel for what kind of playing shape he’s actually in. It could potentially be argued that Wall’s playstyle is a better fit.
    • But more importantly, some of just want to see Russ gone, by any means. Addition by subtraction. Even if Wall ended up being unable to play, just getting rid of Russ and letting our other guys play more would be nice. Would we be a better team? Probably not. But would watching the games be more enjoyable without having to see Russ dribble the ball off his feet again or clank another shot off the top of the backboard? For me, yes.
     
    pika1708 likes this.
  19. lakerjones

    lakerjones Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    10,685
    Likes Received:
    31,802
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    La La land
    Offline
    I would only explore Wall for Westbrook in the off-season if things don’t pan out with Russ. Right now it just doesn’t make sense. Your two main players lobbied to get him here and they will want to see if it works out. If not, sure if it’s a straight swap with no picks on our end.
     
  20. pika1708

    pika1708 - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2020
    Messages:
    2,967
    Likes Received:
    5,270
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I'm with you. Wall is a better playmaker. And I believe more humble to understand his role. Biggest opportunity of his life, Westbrook already has a career established.

    If he doesn't play, we are better without Westbrook, so that would help Monk, Reaves getting more playing time. And Nunn and THT would have a shot too, who knows if we actually don't need to move them?

    We know what we get with Russ. And it will not give us rings. So I'm all about trying a different way
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page