2020-21 Players' Transactions: Breaking News , Trades, Free Agents, And Rumors

Discussion in 'Lakers Discussion' started by TIME, Feb 11, 2020.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BangBoomPow

    BangBoomPow - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2019
    Messages:
    2,027
    Likes Received:
    4,647
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I'm not gonna lie, I am starting to warm up to DeMar being on this team. The knock on him is his three point shooting but Kuz+Green weren't exactly the best shooters out there for us and we've seen how deadly Butler was with his mid-range game. DeMar can be huge and give us another playmaker when LeBron is out. I don't know why the Spurs would want to trade with us, though. I feel like they're going to want a player like Caruso as well.
     
  2. PurPle n GoLd 1

    PurPle n GoLd 1 - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2015
    Messages:
    1,333
    Likes Received:
    1,749
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    818 The Originator of this
    Offline
    I called this lose kuzma gain derozan
     
  3. BangBoomPow

    BangBoomPow - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2019
    Messages:
    2,027
    Likes Received:
    4,647
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Lakers showing interest is irrelevant. Popovich will never help a competing team especially the Lakers. Lakers had a MUCH better package for Kawhi than Toronto did but Popovich and the Spurs refused to trade him to us. It worked out for us on the long run since we got AD but as much as I dislike the C Bags, Spurs will always be the team I hate the most and Popovich may be IMO, the GOAT coach, but I despise the guy. Spurs would rather trade DeRozan for a bag of chips than work with us.
     
    sirronstuff likes this.
  4. Barnstable

    Barnstable Supreme Fuzzler of Lakersball.com Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2014
    Messages:
    7,269
    Likes Received:
    18,611
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Offline
    As I think about it now, I’m not sure if I would do Kuz and Green for DeRozan. His numbers are pretty much what Kuz would put up on a weak team IMO, so how much will DeRozan put up next to LeBron and AD, and he can’t shoot the 3 at all, so he can’t even space the floor. Not sure about the defense either.

    Galanari’s numbers are pretty comparable but he’d be a much better fit.
     
  5. LTLakerFan

    LTLakerFan - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    36,428
    Likes Received:
    60,609
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    So Cal
    Offline
    Not if it costs us Danny Green too.


    [​IMG]


    Am worried though that Pop's going to want at the very least THT or AC as well. He's not doing us ANY favors.
     
  6. Kobe Bryant 8

    Kobe Bryant 8 - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2016
    Messages:
    1,936
    Likes Received:
    5,194
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Hating the C Bags
    Offline
    Heartbeat type of thing if that's the deal. He's an expiring contract and a very efficient player. We can make up the 3pt shooting easily. E'twaun Moore? Lot of options.

    If Pop likes Kuzma as much as some think he does, this may not be far fetched at all. He raved about him during their time together with Team USA.
     
  7. JSM

    JSM - Lakers Legend -

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    18,000
    Likes Received:
    69,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Not sure that's even a comparison because DD has put up good numbers on playoff teams. Comparing that to Kuz on a Detroit or NYK is a moo point.
    [​IMG]
     
  8. BangBoomPow

    BangBoomPow - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2019
    Messages:
    2,027
    Likes Received:
    4,647
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    DeRozan has had success leading a team, though. It's not like he's been putting up numbers on bad teams. Plus, DeRozan is far more consistent than Kuzma has ever been. You know you're gonna get 20/5/5 from DeRozan more often than not. Kuzma, he'll give you 25 points one game and then 9 points the other. Obviously losing Kuzma isn't what we'd like to give up but I see it as making amends for Danny Green's horrible contract and what will probably be another dud of a season from DG next season. As for the spacing, it's not like we had a lot of floor spacing last season. Outside of KCP+Danny Green (only adding him here because he's the 2nd best shooter on the team by default), we didn't have much floor spacing.

    Caruso isn't a reliable shooter.
    Rondo, I'm not sure what happened but I wouldn't expect him to shoot like that in the playoffs again.
    Kuzma can't shoot at all.

    It's not like we were ever an elite shooting team.

    As for Gallo, yeah, he'd be great but how do we get him other than through free agency? DeRozan likely opts-in which allows him to be traded whereas Gallo is 100% unrestricted. We can't afford Gallo unless he takes our MLE and if that's the case, we could still theoretically get DeRozan+Gallo if we trade for DeRozan and Gallo takes the MLE. Best thing about DeRozan is he's only locked in for one more year. It fits within the Lakers timeline in terms of clearing cap for 2021 free agency.
     
    jbiggs likes this.
  9. Weezy

    Weezy Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    18,571
    Likes Received:
    75,408
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Anaheim
    Offline
    I’m not sure of the financials, but I think we could still sign Gallinari even if we traded for DeRozan, he’d have to be good with the only 9 mil we could offer either way. Imagine having both. Whoever, DeRozan, LeBron, Gallinari, AD. Nice.
     
  10. BangBoomPow

    BangBoomPow - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2019
    Messages:
    2,027
    Likes Received:
    4,647
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Man, if the Lakers could pull that off, I am already going to celebrate a back-to-back title.
     
  11. Barnstable

    Barnstable Supreme Fuzzler of Lakersball.com Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2014
    Messages:
    7,269
    Likes Received:
    18,611
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Offline
    DeRozan has put up good numbers on playoff teams, but not next to players like LeBron or AD, so I doubt he averages more than 12 per game in the playoffs next to those two considering how he gets his points.

    And it’s always going to be speculating when a player has never been “The Man” on his own team, but yeah, I think Kuz would put up DeRozan numbers if he was in his position. Not because I think Kuz is the greatest but because I don’t think DeRozan is as good as some seem to think. He’s a good player, that wouldn’t be a great fit for this team, and that’s about it IMO
     
  12. BangBoomPow

    BangBoomPow - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2019
    Messages:
    2,027
    Likes Received:
    4,647
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    So you think Kuzma is a better scorer than DeRozan? Lol.....
     
  13. ElginTheGreat

    ElginTheGreat - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    10,895
    Likes Received:
    30,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline

    This is pretty much what I was thinking.
     
  14. ElginTheGreat

    ElginTheGreat - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    10,895
    Likes Received:
    30,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline


    if we do start shipping people off I’d also prefer a guy like Dinwiddie
     
  15. BangBoomPow

    BangBoomPow - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2019
    Messages:
    2,027
    Likes Received:
    4,647
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    DeRozan isn't a good three point shooter but he shot 48% from 10-16 ft and 43% from 16-3 point line. He can absolutely space the floor. But what he will do is give us another player who can create for himself and others. I would feel a lot more confident knowing that we have DeMar+AD out there with Bron resting. Let's just look at what the Lakers can offer... it's not much, honestly. Other teams can offer much better offers than the Lakers have so we can't be too picky about how the Lakers should improve themselves. There isn't much downside to DeRozan. One year deal, All-Star talent, can play off the ball, can create plays, and gives us another legitimate scorer who we can rely on with AD or Bron being benched.
     
    Toneloc, JohnnyComeLately2k6 and JSM like this.
  16. Barnstable

    Barnstable Supreme Fuzzler of Lakersball.com Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2014
    Messages:
    7,269
    Likes Received:
    18,611
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Offline
    Imagine teams playing DeRozan the way they played Rondo this past season and in the playoffs, except DeRozan wouldn’t hit any of his 3’s the way Rondo did. That’s the difference in production from possession to possession and it might be crippling if we don’t get better shooters in there.

    I’m much more open to getting DeRozen if we can get Gallo as well, or Joe Harris (Pipe dream I know), or someone of that caliber of a shooter, but by himself, I think getting DeRozan causes more problems than it solves for us.
     
  17. BangBoomPow

    BangBoomPow - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2019
    Messages:
    2,027
    Likes Received:
    4,647
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Those are such arbitrary comparisons and the stats are definitely inflated due to him being on a team where he's the focal point as compared to DeRozan being on the Spurs in which everything is more team-oriented. Perimeter shooting is given to Dinwiddie when he shoots 31% from three? I wouldn't want my player shooting ANY threes if he's shooting 31% from three. Finishing? What does that mean? Around the basket? DeRozan is a much better finisher. I'm not even gonna bother with the rest... that comparison you are using is not accurate at all.
     
  18. BangBoomPow

    BangBoomPow - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2019
    Messages:
    2,027
    Likes Received:
    4,647
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    But we played Kuzma 23 MPG in the playoffs and he shot 31% from three so why are you acting as if DeRozan would be much worse than that? You're not even accounting for the fact that DeRozan is infinitely better in other areas. Also, if we get DeRozan, you already know Rob is going to find a way to get more shooters on the team. That's already a given considering Rob has already been vocal about getting more shooters. I just don't get how you can say DeRozan wouldn't average more than 12 PPG in the playoffs but Kyle Kuzma averaged 10 and shot 31% from three.. Butler averaged near 30 in the Finals and he only attempted 13 threes (shot 31%). Why do we act like someone who can't shoot threes but is a great mid-range player can't be of benefit to us?
     
  19. Barnstable

    Barnstable Supreme Fuzzler of Lakersball.com Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2014
    Messages:
    7,269
    Likes Received:
    18,611
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Offline
    Not a better scorer, but comparable, yes.

    You do remember before AD got here, Kuz did average almost 20 per? Once AD got here, that took up Kuz's minutes, touches, and offensive focus. But at the beginning of this past season, Kuz dedicated himself to learning defense, and he was injured at the beginning, so he accepted more of a roleplayer role.
     
    jbiggs and JohnnyComeLately2k6 like this.
  20. Barnstable

    Barnstable Supreme Fuzzler of Lakersball.com Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2014
    Messages:
    7,269
    Likes Received:
    18,611
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Offline
    Because as bad a s Kuz shot, teams wouldn't leave him open the way they did Rondo, and the way they would DeRozen. The percieved threat from Kuz still spaced the floor. DeRozen would neither space the floor with percieved threat (Kuz), nor hit the wide open 3 if teams didn't respect him (Rondo), so DeRozen would do nothing for us in this respect except hurt the offense.

    Kuz is a better defender, by a lot in terms of versatility, and defensive versatility is what won us a chip this year.

    Butler had a bunch of 3pt snippers around him. We don't have that. As I said, I'd be much more into it if he could add some shooters like Gallo.
     
    JohnnyComeLately2k6 likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page