DRAFT TALK Thread: Looking Like Lonzo

Discussion in 'Lakers Discussion' started by Lakerman JSJ, May 9, 2017.

Page 88 of 173
  1. JLaker17

    JLaker17 - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2014
    Messages:
    2,298
    Likes Received:
    5,825
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
     
    JLaker17, Jun 6, 2017
    #1741
    Barnstable and ElginTheGreat like this.
  2. alam1108

    alam1108 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    13,585
    Likes Received:
    37,190
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Laker Land
    Offline
    alam1108, Jun 6, 2017
    #1742
  3. lakerfan2

    lakerfan2 - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2014
    Messages:
    5,220
    Likes Received:
    10,105
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Simi Valley
    Offline
    I wonder for these workouts if they bring in any of the current players for situations like Lonzo because he's more of a distributor.

    Try to run sets, let him operate and make decisions on his own.
     
    lakerfan2, Jun 6, 2017
    #1743
    Barnstable likes this.
  4. OmarE

    OmarE - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2014
    Messages:
    2,752
    Likes Received:
    7,340
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Anaheim, CA
    Offline
    #speakitintoexistence
     
    OmarE, Jun 6, 2017
    #1744
    Barnstable and John3:16 like this.
  5. OmarE

    OmarE - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2014
    Messages:
    2,752
    Likes Received:
    7,340
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Anaheim, CA
    Offline
    I'm curious if any of the Lakers players joined in on the dinner with Lonzo, the way they did last year with Ingram...
     
    OmarE, Jun 6, 2017
    #1745
    Barnstable, therealdeal and John3:16 like this.
  6. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    That report doesn't make a ton of sense. I think Fox could be there at 5 actually.
     
    therealdeal, Jun 6, 2017
    #1746
  7. Weezy

    Weezy Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    18,571
    Likes Received:
    75,408
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Anaheim
    Offline
    Interesting scenario, but who would we be getting at 5 and 10? If we did this the last 2 seasons assuming the draft order remained the same (which is unlikely I know) we'd have gotten Hezonja and Winslow over Russ, and Dunn and Maker over Ingram. I wouldn't redo either scenario, one possibly great, possibly franchise player is better than 2 good to decent players. That said, at least in the 2015 draft, with hindsight we could have also ended up with Myles Turner and Devin Booker in the same scenario. It's a crap shoot as always, but I still take the best player I feel I can get vs a couple players later on. Just my opinion.
     
    Weezy, Jun 6, 2017
    #1747
    Barnstable, tada, ElginTheGreat and 1 other person like this.
  8. Khmrp

    Khmrp - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2016
    Messages:
    12,084
    Likes Received:
    13,820
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Let him go 1 on 1 against Dlo lol
     
    Khmrp, Jun 6, 2017
    #1748
  9. lakerfan2

    lakerfan2 - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2014
    Messages:
    5,220
    Likes Received:
    10,105
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Simi Valley
    Offline
    Against Metta

    :Kobe Snickering:
     
    lakerfan2, Jun 6, 2017
    #1749
  10. ElginTheGreat

    ElginTheGreat - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    10,895
    Likes Received:
    30,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline

    I wouldn't do it either. If we're going to trade the pick I'd honestly rather use it to bring in George or Butler than 2 more young guys who will need a few years to develop.
     
    ElginTheGreat, Jun 6, 2017
    #1750
    Barnstable and Weezy like this.
  11. 432J

    432J - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    6,833
    Likes Received:
    15,161
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    if for some god awful reason they trade with SAC and acquire the #5 and #10 picks then i hope they take fox and markkanen

    but still, i would hate to see the pick traded. just keep it and draft ball or fox
     
    432J, Jun 7, 2017
    #1751
  12. SFGOLDRUSHER

    SFGOLDRUSHER - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2014
    Messages:
    3,094
    Likes Received:
    2,181
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Master Optimist.
    Location:
    San Diego
    Offline
    You think anyone would take MozDeng if we offer 10 and 28?
     
    SFGOLDRUSHER, Jun 7, 2017
    #1752
  13. sirronstuff

    sirronstuff - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    31,623
    Likes Received:
    76,929
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Your time is running out Ham
    Location:
    Laker Purgatory
    Offline
     
    sirronstuff, Jun 7, 2017
    #1753
    ElginTheGreat, JohnnyComeLately2k6, OmarE and 6 others like this.
  14. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    28,026
    Likes Received:
    75,623
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    right: who says the lakers use both picks if they made that trade. maybe they take the best of who's left out of fultz/ball/fox/jackson/tatum (seems to be the consensus top five) at 5, then use 10 in trade for veteran (perhaps george).

    if you're not 100% sold on a single player at #2, this would totally be the play.
     
    abeer3, Jun 7, 2017
    #1754
    432J, TIME and trodgers like this.
  15. trodgers

    trodgers Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    12,126
    Likes Received:
    18,496
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Professor of Humanities
    Location:
    Orlando
    Offline
    If top 5 is fultz, ball, fox, Tatum, Jackson, then we get one of them. And another top ten player? Sounds good.
     
    trodgers, Jun 7, 2017
    #1755
    Khmrp and TIME like this.
  16. LTLakerFan

    LTLakerFan - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    36,428
    Likes Received:
    60,611
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    So Cal
    Online
    Who's going down to watch the Lonzo workout today? Hit me up .... we can get a bite and couple beers after to discuss. :cool:
     
    LTLakerFan, Jun 7, 2017
    #1756
    KareemtheGreat33, JohnnyComeLately2k6, Barnstable and 2 others like this.
  17. tada

    tada - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2014
    Messages:
    4,467
    Likes Received:
    8,535
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    We have a very competent scouting department. I'm confident that they'd be locked into one player at #2 by draft night. Trading down 3 spots is not a viable option.
     
    tada, Jun 7, 2017
    #1757
  18. trodgers

    trodgers Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    12,126
    Likes Received:
    18,496
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Professor of Humanities
    Location:
    Orlando
    Offline
    Always have to be willing. Never lock onto your receiver. ;)
     
    trodgers, Jun 7, 2017
    #1758
    KareemtheGreat33 and jbiggs like this.
  19. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I think it's viable in a similar way that's it's viable we sign a big name FA this summer. I don't think it's at all likely and it's just a slow news cycle in sports right now. I don't know any precedent off the top of my head for a team trading two Top 10 picks for a Top 3 pick. It's not a sound move by that team and I think people are only really considering it because Vlade and the Kings are that bad a franchise.

    Last year though, the Kings moved down in the draft from 8 to 13 and 28. If that's our baseline, we're probably not on the same page going from 2 to 5 and 10.
    In 2015 the Wizards gave up 19 and two 2nds to move up to 15.
    In 2014 the Bulls traded 16, 19, and a 2nd to move up to 11.
    In 2014 the Magic traded 12, a future 1st, and a 2nd to move up to 10.
    In 2013 the Jazz traded 14 and 21 to move up to 9.
    In 2013 the C Bags traded 16 and two 2nds to move up to 13.
    In 2013 the Jazz traded a 2nd round pick and some cash to go to 27. (I just posted this because all it took was #46 and some cash to buy Rudy Gobert)

    The valuation to me doesn't add up, but hey if Sacramento wants to trade to #2 to get De'Aaron Fox for some reason, then I'd pull the trigger. If that happens I'm thinking... We take whoever is left of Fultz, Ball, Jackson, or Tatum and then scoop up one of the big Collins at 10. I know people like Zubac, but we might find a better big man prospect in the teens of this draft.

    That being said, I don't necessarily want two more picks this year. I'd prefer a future pick if we trade down.
     
    therealdeal, Jun 7, 2017
    #1759
    trodgers, LTLakerFan and Barnstable like this.
  20. 432J

    432J - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    6,833
    Likes Received:
    15,161
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    i like this idea if they were to trade the #2 pick

    i think the #10 pick could fetch a pretty decent return. although i'm not sure indy would be willing to unload PG for anything lower than a top 5 pick
     
    432J, Jun 7, 2017
    #1760
Page 88 of 173

Share This Page