Career averages for Collison. 12.7 pts, .469FG%, 38%3PT, .852 FT%, 2.2 REB, 4.8 ASST, 1.1STL, 2.1TO. Round up a few things and that's pretty darn solid career so far for me lol. I dunno why no staffs ever made him gain some good mass, I think it would be good for him.
am in trouble if i say that is see some anthony brown in sterling brown? similar shot mechanics/lack of pop.
No..... now in spite of big mouth big baller Lavar running his mouth to say they wanted to work out against Fox, now the camp (probably wisely his agent advised against, or maybe Fox's camp) I just saw a quote a few minutes ago from Harrison Faigen that it will be an individual workout.
Lavar will talk but did u actually think that would happen? Come on, Lavar KNEW it wouldn't but it's good for TV
No I said at the time why would they take that risk since they're hell bent on him being a Laker, and where was his agent in all that bravado.
No just a stupid move to do it. One on one isn't the test anyway is it? Would have had to have had at least 3 on 3 but again a stupid move. The agent finally probably told Lavar to STFU or get another agent. Maybe they like him a lot? Harrison Gains. New agency headed by LaVar yeah, but potential clients are going to want to work with real agent skills (allegedly) and not a great look if impression is given LaVar can run his mouth and really be the one to affect your future going forward as a player with stupid stuff that comes flying out of his pie hole all the time. http://www.latimes.com/sports/ucla/la-sp-lonzo-ball-wooden-20170407-story.html
sure its a team game but still wouldve been nice to see the talk backed up....I know we all like to think every pick we make turns out great, but many of time players have fooled gm's over and over again.
dennis smith is going to be a really interesting draft pick. that could go a lot of ways, from perennial allstar to stat-padding loser. i've seen his comps as paul, baron davis, steve francis, eric bledsoe...yet nobody has him high in the draft. seems like a sacramento pick at 5 if i've ever seen one.
Yeah, he is interesting. He was right there with Fultz and Ball for a while and has fallen out of the spotlight. I never got to actually see him in a game so its hard for me to peg him. I think someone could get a steal later on in the lottery though.
Yeah, I don't get that one at all. I really don't want us taking Jackson over a Point Guard. Nice athlete but I don't see where he would fit on our team as constructed. We really need someone to help set the table alongside Russell. Plus the off court issues. I could see drafting Fox but not Jackson.