i agree but its smarter to add a 2nd max now cause you wont have this type of cap space for a long time once ball/ingram maybe randle get their...
i wouldnt feel confident if hes the starter next yr even with 2 max star unless we have randle or someone like randle but taller backing up lopez
thats not how trades work either, if vic #s were like that in okc he wouldvenever gotten traded...jc #s is almost the same as okc odalipo n randle...
ok if you just base trade value on current production then pg # have decline n in addition okc troubled situation, the "rental" value is still...
i thought lavar was gona keep his mouth shut when it came to the lakers?
okc didnt give up as much for pg themselves, im only considering the value of sabonis/vic as okc player, not pacers stats
i let them pick between kcp or slopez n throw in hart/one of the 2nd rd pick we own...then shoot over an offer of deng/2 1st for mirotic
need to strike now (magic/rob) while the dumpster fire is at its hottest lol
if they went to OT in that gm, guranteed Nance still plays all of ot n they were having problems scoring, ingram was also in foul trouble i didnt...
so what did we need nance for in those closing minutes against the clips?
except more gms lol
no space for 2nd max, i dont think this trade is legal (our side)
if he had played end of clipps gm along with jc they wouldve won
nice gm
they were missing 3 starters, makes even more pathetic
lol fluke, we saw him on our team drop nearly that much last yr against okc....its a fluke if thus was some no name bench chucker, we know n seen...
dislike luke the coach more than luke the player after his big contract
I thought it was 2 yrs but in the 20s mill per? If that isnt a sweetheart deal, than what is?
luke is a slow learner
i think Zo needs to dominate the ball, our half court set suck n doesnt play to ball strengths
