So... Draft Prospects?

Discussion in 'Lakers Discussion' started by ShowTime_IR, Nov 21, 2015.

  1. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    28,047
    Likes Received:
    75,685
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Online
    well, I'd have to look at the salary list, but I'm pretty sure the lakers could snag three players on big ending deals and eat up most of that space. I hope that's not what we're looking at, obviously. I'm just being a realist. the pitch isn't much stronger this year than last. the roster is light years from contention, and lots of teams will have money (including the teams who currently employ these coveted FAs, btw). I'm sure every fan site has a Durant/horford join up here scenario, but most are going to be digging through the luol deng bargain bin...and probably not even getting bargains.
     
  2. Weezy

    Weezy Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    18,580
    Likes Received:
    75,448
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Anaheim
    Offline
    On the topic of Simmons and Ingram, this is starting to feel like the Wiggins/Parker season all over again. Good, but overhyped players, there is no savior in this draft, Simmons is not LeBron.
     
  3. Savory Griddles

    Savory Griddles Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Messages:
    9,152
    Likes Received:
    22,367
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    You seem to be under the impression that we are losing on purpose. Is it to give you hope our front office isn't that bad? ;)
     
  4. johnnyboy

    johnnyboy - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    1,317
    Likes Received:
    1,982
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Im Satoshi Nakamoto
    Location:
    Orange County
    Offline
    To me Simmons reminds me more of lamar odom than lebron. I never really saw lebron in him.
     
    Battle Tested20 likes this.
  5. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    28,047
    Likes Received:
    75,685
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Online
    I think I said that a few pages back, too. LeBron's physical profile and athleticism were a level above simmons'. sometimes simmons reminds me of billy owens a bit, too. again, though, I wasn't sold on towns being a superstar, and I was obviously wrong about that.
     
  6. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    No I think it's pretty clear the FO is losing on purpose. There's no way you can be this bad without trying to be this bad. That includes not making moves at the deadline to improve the team, not picking up guys off the waiver, etc. Tell me how are we only 3 games better than the Sixers if we're not trying to lose games?

    This is a not-so-subtle tank job and I don't think you go into next season TRYING to lose games like we are this season. Replacing Byron means probably 4-6 more wins at this point which would set us up to make a run at about 30 wins which is what I expect at the least next season assuming we don't make a huge splash in FA.
     
  7. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    We're looking at over 60 million dollars in cap space. Here's the high contracts expiring in 2017 (assuming some of them don't opt out this coming summer):

    LeBron- 24 million
    Howard- 23.3 million
    Rose- 21.3 million
    Griffin- 20.1 million
    Westbrook- 17.7 million
    Parsons- 16 million
    Bogut- 12.7 million
    Ibaka- 12.5 million
    Curry- 12.1 million
    Amir Johnson- 12 million
    Jrue Holiday- 11.3 million
    Andre Iguodala- 11.1 million
    Zach Randolph- 10.4 million
    Tyreke Evans- 10.2 million
    Lance Stephenson- 9.4 million
    Taj Gibson- 8.6 million
    Splitter- 8.6 million
    George Hill- 8 million
    Teague- 8 million


    I can see maybe taking on a guy like Amir and Tyreke and maybe Lance, but that's still only a little over half way there. We're going to have to give a max contract to somebody out there. Whiteside seems to be the slam dunk pick there.

    If we came out of this season with Tyreke, Whiteside, and maybe Taj Gibson or Splitter or something then I think we've improved quite a bit. That's a team that, with a decent coach, can win 30 games and would NOT be purposely losing games.
     
    abeer3 likes this.
  8. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    28,047
    Likes Received:
    75,685
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Online
    i think the only sign of real tanking is that byron still has a job. it doesn't mean they're trying to lose, but it does mean that they're not trying their hardest to win.

    i thought the FO was trying to win in making the moves last summer, actually. it was reasonable to expect the lakers to win 30 games this year, imo. they didn't go full philly and just sign nobody. they took hibbert on without demanding a pick, which meant they thought he was going to help them win games. still, it was a somewhat half-assed strategy because they held off on long-term, big money commitments after the big fish were gone. i'm not sure that's necessarily a bad strategy, though. dramatically overpaying middling talent is the road to sacramento kingsville.
     
  9. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    28,047
    Likes Received:
    75,685
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Online
    thanks for the list.

    whiteside has to take the max from la, though. there will be others offering it.

    rose is interesting. seems like someone that a) chicago's probably ready to cut ties with and b) the lakers might be willing to take on as a one-year flier. i'd consider that a good use of cap space, actually. it's a gamble, but i think you have to gamble some in the lakers' position. whiteside is probably just as big a gamble, if not bigger.
     
  10. Savory Griddles

    Savory Griddles Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Messages:
    9,152
    Likes Received:
    22,367
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I don't know. I really, really want to believe that, but we went out and got Hibbert thinking he could find his form of two seasons ago, signed a couple nice veterans in Bass and Lou. I KNOW we went into the season trying to win. Did it switch to us trying to lose? I honestly think our coaching staff and front office might be THAT bad. There's a difference between intentionally putting out a team that will lose games and seeing that the current team isn't going to do anything and choosing not to improve it. Also, any decent player who was on the waiver wire was going to sign with a contender, not us. Like I said, I want to believe we are intentionally losing, but I think our coaching staff is trying and the team we have now (no injuries) is the same team the FO thought could win in the beginning of the season.
     
    abeer3 likes this.
  11. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I don't believe they went into the season expecting to fail. I remember Mitch's frustrated comments late last year and I think he was genuinely ticked off at how bad they were. He probably understood then that there was only one course of action left: tank.

    I believe from about December on we've been actively trying to lose games. Yes Byron is that bad of a coach, but we've also done nothing whatsoever to improve. We've added nobody, subtracted none of the dead weight (why is Ryan Kelly here?), and made no trades at the deadline. We're doing absolutely nothing to win this year.

    I agree completely that if Byron is still here next season it's a de facto tank because he will be incapable of winning 30 games, but I find it incredibly unlikely that he keeps his job. There is absolutely zero support from him everywhere besides his best buddies. He's not good for business, not good for basketball, not good for our young team, not good for the fans... I mean what is he good for besides losing? Nothing. If he's here, we're losing. I agree completely with that.
     
  12. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I'm just not sure we find many real "dump" candidates. I don't see Chicago giving up Rose without getting anything worthwhile back. They'd absolutely demand Clarkson or Russell if we got Rose and I don't think the Lakers would make that call. I hope they wouldn't. I love Rose, but I do not trust his health at all.
     
    Cookie likes this.
  13. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    28,047
    Likes Received:
    75,685
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Online
    my thought was that they might want to remove 21 million from the books to chase other FAs. as it stands, they can't be big players in FA this summer. and with rose's health woes, i don't think a lot of teams will be in position to risk that much space. the lakers might be an exception, though.
     
  14. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Yeah maybe, but if they're looking to dump Rose then I'm not sure what their goals would be. The Bulls will have about 15 million to spend this summer without that dump. I'd think they're looking at guys like Mozgov or something to shore up that gap. Heck maybe go the other way and get guard depth with Vazquez or something. I'm not sure they're ready to dump Rose yet.

    My point is that I'm not sure we're going to even be able to find enough big expirings to do what we've been doing. We've simply got too much cap space right now. We're going to hand out max deals to at least one guy and I'm guessing probably two. It all comes down to whether or not that or those guy(s) deserve it.
     
  15. Battle Tested20

    Battle Tested20 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    9,213
    Likes Received:
    24,866
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Technical Data Analyst
    Location:
    Fair Oaks, CA
    Offline
    This.
     
  16. JSM

    JSM - Lakers Legend -

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    18,025
    Likes Received:
    69,898
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Not really news since we all knew this already, but the decision makers still slightly favor Simmons...

     
    trodgers and ElginTheGreat like this.
  17. Weezy

    Weezy Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    18,580
    Likes Received:
    75,448
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Anaheim
    Offline
    I don't get the "including Philly" blurb there. Is that because Noel and Okafor are considered PF's and so is Simmons? Seems like all he needs is a better shot and he's a tall 3 to me. Plus Okafor and Noel are clearly both big enough to play Center today. Or does he mean even Philly isn't stupid enough to take anyone else?
     
    Savory Griddles and therealdeal like this.
  18. Savory Griddles

    Savory Griddles Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Messages:
    9,152
    Likes Received:
    22,367
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I guess that's what it means. If Philly lands the #1 pick, they will definitely have to dump someone. I'd like to take Noel off their hands as our center of the future. Defensively, he's exactly what we need.

    That's an interesting question. Let's say Philly lands at #1 and we land at #2 in the draft. Would you trade the #2 pick for Noel? Sign Batum.

    Noel/Black
    Randle/Nance
    Batum/Swaggy/A. Brown
    Clarkson/J. Brown
    Russell/Lou

    Luke as our head coach.

    I actually really like that lineup. Then next offseason we plunder Westbrook from OKC and move Clarkson to our deluxe sixth man.
     
  19. Battle Tested20

    Battle Tested20 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    9,213
    Likes Received:
    24,866
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Technical Data Analyst
    Location:
    Fair Oaks, CA
    Offline
    I would rather go after whiteside. Noel doesn't do anything for me
     
  20. Lakers2015

    Lakers2015 - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2015
    Messages:
    3,634
    Likes Received:
    6,103
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    No way we trade Ingram for Noel. Don't need him. Sign Whiteside, keep the pick and were better off.
     
    ElginTheGreat likes this.

Share This Page