Presidential Election Aftermath: What Now / What Next?

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion and Philosophy -(FORUM CLOSED)-' started by davriver209, Aug 11, 2015.

  1. John3:16

    John3:16 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    6,590
    Likes Received:
    15,641
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    CEO - Big Baller Brand
    Offline
  2. Barnstable

    Barnstable Supreme Fuzzler of Lakersball.com Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2014
    Messages:
    7,269
    Likes Received:
    18,611
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Offline
    But continue with the other side of the choices those people you're talking about made... they regularly get their lights turned off, car repossessed, terrible credit since they ruined it to get that 70" TV and blue ray player from Rent A Center, etc, etc... all that doesn't add up to poor people living the good life, it adds up to poor priorities where they rent a TV instead of paying on a mortgage. That's on them to a large extent. They made poor choices that lead to us paying billions of dollars in welfare and other government subsidies... compare that to the trillions in corporate tax fraud we have to pay because some don't want or care if all people pay their fair share in taxes, and I think I know which is the bigger problem in the US.
     
  3. John3:16

    John3:16 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    6,590
    Likes Received:
    15,641
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    CEO - Big Baller Brand
    Offline
    You get no argument from me. One is poor choices. The other is criminal behavior that our politicians (both sides) refuse to prosecute. So when those same politicians paint them as these bad, evil people, I'm hesitant to jump on board because it's just talk. And those same politicians are RICH too.
     
    Barnstable likes this.
  4. Barnstable

    Barnstable Supreme Fuzzler of Lakersball.com Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2014
    Messages:
    7,269
    Likes Received:
    18,611
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Offline
    Very true, and a president can't change everything alone, but you have to start somewhere. A president weilds more power than anyone else in influencing US policy, so I hope Bernie will really try to do what he says. Obama saying he will not have lobbyist in his administration, and then turning right around and adding them, immediately lost my admiration.

    I think we either have to stop trying to find a president that will be as honest as a politician can be, or take a risk on someone that sounds like they believe what they'll try to follow through with what they're saying
     
  5. John3:16

    John3:16 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    6,590
    Likes Received:
    15,641
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    CEO - Big Baller Brand
    Offline
    GOP has 3 people running who are not politicians. Add in Rubio who is so fed up with Congress that he will not run for Senate again.

    I'm not a fan of Trump (other than I admit to finding him immaturely hilarious). But I really like Carson and Fiorina. They are not politicians (as you know).

    Does anyone really think Carson will bow down to lobbyist? I don't for one second.

    I'll also add, Fiorina is #1 in the latest post-GOP debate poll. :heart:
     
    Barnstable likes this.
  6. Barnstable

    Barnstable Supreme Fuzzler of Lakersball.com Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2014
    Messages:
    7,269
    Likes Received:
    18,611
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Offline
    +1 for Sanders

    "
    Bernie Sanders Unveils Ambitious Plan To End Private Prisons

    BY CARIMAH TOWNES[​IMG] SEP 17, 2015 12:55PM

    [​IMG]
    CREDIT: ASSOCIATED PRESS/CLIFF OWEN


    Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) is officially taking on the country’s private prison industry. By introducing a bill that would ban government contracts with private prisons, the presidential contender is quickly becoming the loudest advocate for criminal justice reform among his competitors.

    The Justice is Not For Sale Act, co-sponsored by Reps. Raúl M. Grijalva (D-AZ), Keith Ellison (D-MN) and Bobby L. Rush (D-IL), would prohibit the federal government from entering contracts with private prison corporations within two years of the bill’s enactment. Instead, state and local government will be solely responsible for overseeing state and local correctional facilities.

    “Study after study after study has shown private prisons are not cheaper, they are not safer, and they do not provide better outcomes for either the prisoners or the state,” Sanders said at a press conference Thursday.

    In 2013, 8.4 percent of the 1.6 million inmates in federal and state prisons were locked away in prisons managed by private entities. By profiting off of the number of inmates as well as inmate labor, large corporations are primarily concerned with filling their prisons — leading to overcrowding and incentivizing the incarceration of people who commit low-level offenses. Poor management has led to the cruel treatment of people behind bars, who are denied medical services, brutalized by correctional staff, and subjected to inhumane living conditions. And because they are driven by profit, private prisons are less inclined to invest in rehabilitative services for inmates.

    Raking in billions of dollars, two of the largest prison corporations, GEO Group and Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), are some of the most influential lobbyists in the country.

    “In my view, corporations should not be allowed to make a profit by building more jails and keeping more Americans behind bars. We have got to end the private-for-profit prison racket in America,” Sanders said. “It is unacceptable that companies like Corrections Corporation of America and the GEO Group are spending tens of millions of dollars lobbying members of Congress and state legislatures all over this country to keep more Americans behind bars for longer and longer sentences. That has got to end.”

    In addition to overhauling private prisons, the act calls for the reinstatement of federal parole guidelines for eligible prisoners to be released prior to completing their sentences. It eliminates the requirement that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) meet a 34,000 bed quota, which leads to the detention and abuse of undocumented immigrants to the financial benefit of prison corporations like GEO and CCA. And it also mandates the regulation of video and telephone services in correctional facilities, which overcharge inmates to the benefit of staff and corporate entities.

    With this bill, Sanders is further positioning himself as one of the staunchest proponents of criminal — and racial — justice in the presidential race, setting himself apart from Democratic and Republican candidates alike.

    Facing mounting pressure from Black Lives Matter activists, who interrupted two of his press events this summer, Sanders unveiled a comprehensive racial justice platform in August, emphasizing state-sanctioned violence against communities of color and specific policies to fix the broken justice system. In addition to outlawing private prisons, Sanders also favors banning the box to minimize job discrimination against convicted felons, restoring voting rights for convicted felons, eliminating mandatory minimum sentences and putting greater emphasis on prison diversion programs. On Wednesday, Sanders met with Black Lives Matter activists to discuss future policy.

    Sanders’ strong emphasis on state-backed violence and law enforcement’s role in it sets him apart from his immediate competition.

    Martin O’Malley (D) was similarly targeted by Black Lives Matter protesters, after which he released his own criminal justice plan. His plan also covers fair sentencing, phasing out federal for-profit prisons, voting rights restoration, and economic justice for convicted felons. His platform does not, however, identify police as systemic perpetrators of violence against communities of color as Sanders’ does.

    Hillary Clinton has vocalized the need for criminal justice reform, but has yet to outline a policy platform."

    http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2015/09/17/3702659/bernie-sanders-prison-bill/
     
    revgen likes this.
  7. revgen

    revgen - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,833
    Likes Received:
    4,203
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    The main excuse politicians and bureaucrats have for sending prisoners to private facilities is overcrowding. Ending the Drug War will put the private prisons out of business for the most part IMO. Public prisons & jails will have more room and won't need to contract out to private facilities.
     
    Barnstable likes this.
  8. John3:16

    John3:16 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    6,590
    Likes Received:
    15,641
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    CEO - Big Baller Brand
    Offline
    Prisons are big business. What does it say about our country that people are profiting off sending people to prison? If we're paying top dollar for it, shouldn't there be at least some form of rehabilitation?
     
    revgen and Barnstable like this.
  9. davriver209

    davriver209 - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2014
    Messages:
    771
    Likes Received:
    659
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Occupation:
    Police Officer
    Location:
    Stockton, CA
    Offline
    The prison system as a whole is in shambles... Tons of violent killers and gangsters that are being housed and allowed to continue living. What people don't get, is our prisons are holding a ton of guys on death row. I say why not spare the tax payer dollar and just end these maggots with a bullet to the brain? Sentenced to death? End it quickly, cheap and efficiently. There is no true "humane" way to kill a person. We end this endless line of death row inmates and we get a ton of room in our prisons. Not the only way to reform the prison system but I feel it's a good start.
     
  10. John3:16

    John3:16 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    6,590
    Likes Received:
    15,641
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    CEO - Big Baller Brand
    Offline
    ^^^ so many reasons not to execute people. due process. Many have been proven innocent. Cost (as absurd as it sounds, it costs more to execute a person than to let them live on Death Row).
     
    revgen and Barnstable like this.
  11. Helljumper

    Helljumper - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    4,933
    Likes Received:
    14,677
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Offline
    I was with you on those first points, but you're right; that last point sounds too absurd to believe. I'm legitimately curious about that. Is whatever humane method of execution we've decided upon really more expensive than paying someone to live in the prison system for decades?

    Or is it that by executing more rapidly, we'd end up wrongly executing more people, and as a net result we'd end up paying more to compensate the families of wrongly executed prisoners when the incorrect execution is eventually discovered?
     
  12. John3:16

    John3:16 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    6,590
    Likes Received:
    15,641
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    CEO - Big Baller Brand
    Offline
    It costs more because of the legal process. They get so many appeals and those lawyers aren't cheap. You're talking a 20 - 30 year process in most cases.

    And I agree with it. This is the type of thing that separates us from other countries.

    Having said all that, I must admit I'm against the death penalty.
     
    revgen and Barnstable like this.
  13. Barnstable

    Barnstable Supreme Fuzzler of Lakersball.com Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2014
    Messages:
    7,269
    Likes Received:
    18,611
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Offline
    You've come so far young Padawan :) :rock:
     
    John3:16 likes this.
  14. davriver209

    davriver209 - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2014
    Messages:
    771
    Likes Received:
    659
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Occupation:
    Police Officer
    Location:
    Stockton, CA
    Offline
    While I'm not really for the death penalty, our justice system has allowed the death penalty to exist. So, if thats the case, why make it an extremely complicated and long drawn out process? That's what is wrong with our system. Complicated, delayed all the time and expensive. I still say it'd be cheaper to execute them with a bullet than house them for 30+ years. I'd really like to see some data regarding that.

    I'm not cold blooded or anything, I just don't see the point in delaying the inevitable
     
  15. davriver209

    davriver209 - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2014
    Messages:
    771
    Likes Received:
    659
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Occupation:
    Police Officer
    Location:
    Stockton, CA
    Offline
    sorry, I think I quoted the wrong person. And as far as proving people's innocence. Our investigating methods and tools have enhanced over time. When someone is found guilty, the people casting the verdict are sold "without any reasonable doubt" that the individual committed the crime. So, I'm sure that this whole thing about inmates on death row being found to be innocent are one in a million.

    I have so many views that need extensive explaining, I just don't have the time right now. Lol.
     
    John3:16 likes this.
  16. Barnstable

    Barnstable Supreme Fuzzler of Lakersball.com Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2014
    Messages:
    7,269
    Likes Received:
    18,611
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Offline
    There's been 155 people set to die on death row that have been exonerated since 1973, the most recent one was in June. That's 155 innocent people that would have been killed if we just shot them once they were convicted.

    I care more about killing innocent people than the legal cost.
     
    revgen and John3:16 like this.
  17. John3:16

    John3:16 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    6,590
    Likes Received:
    15,641
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    CEO - Big Baller Brand
    Offline
    Trump took heat this week when one of his supporters called Obama a Muslim and Trump didn't correct him.

    In true Trump fashion, he said it's not his job to defend the president and he knows Obama would never defend him.

    This situation is a good example of why people love and hate him.
     
    Barnstable likes this.
  18. Barnstable

    Barnstable Supreme Fuzzler of Lakersball.com Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2014
    Messages:
    7,269
    Likes Received:
    18,611
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Offline
    Don't know how to feel about that one. I agree it isn't his job to correct even the crazy things his supporters say, but at the same time if someone said something like that to Sanders and Sanders didn't correct him, I'd loose some respect for him.
     
    John3:16 likes this.
  19. Azndude2190

    Azndude2190 - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Messages:
    1,588
    Likes Received:
    3,919
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Why not? John McCain did when he was confronted with the same BS.

    Fact is, this wasn't some dude in the back of the room yelling crazy stuff or a person holding a sign outside, this guy was given the microphone to speak and it was pretty much up front.
     
  20. John3:16

    John3:16 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    6,590
    Likes Received:
    15,641
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    CEO - Big Baller Brand
    Offline
    Fiorina challenged Obama and Clinton to view the Planned Parenthood videos of an aborted child moving in the table. Obama and Hillary supporters said she was lying about the video. I've seen it and it's beyond disgusting, so I know it exists. I'm sure they've seen the same video. When are they going to speak out in her defense? Or condemn Planned Parenthood for these acts?
     

Share This Page