JJ, LeBron, and Luka sitting in a room together to gameplan for a 7 game series against any team... There's no way they walk out of that room not fully prepared for what they have to do
i believe that the scheme matters and that lebron's communication matters, but i'm also still of the mind that caring about it is the biggest factor, as jj has suggested. to play jokic the way we did just takes a ton of energy and focus--and not all teams can put five guys on the floor who can/will do that.
We shouldn't undersell how important the scheme really is. I haven't seen anyone else employing it this extensively or successfully in the NBA as of yet. We're basically playing the percentages on defence not just on a player by player basis, but also on a per shot per player basis. Didn't expect this kind of stuff from JJ if I'm being honest.
do we believe that nobody has tried this or that nobody has successfully done it because it's hard to get that level of buy-in and attention to detail? it's not like this kind of analytics hasn't been available for a long time. i would find it hard to believe that teams aren't talking about these exact things all the time. i mean, the analysts watching the game basically talk about it without the numbers and have done so since the 80s. "don't let him get to his right shoulder." "you'll take that shot from that guy, but not this one", etc. even in the piece they allude to bobby knight's schemes. i'm just not sure the scheme itself is super innovative. it's the ability to execute in the nba.
I think it's a few things. -First you have to have the horses. -the coach has to be a great communicator. -he has to be able to get top down buy-in. JJ even holds Bron to account, their relationship allows that, that's not the case with a lot of HCs and their franchise player. -then a high level on the court communicator to lead/organize. Bron is a super computer, he sees the game better than 99.5% of players to ever lace them up. For most teams, you can't check all those boxes.
right. so it's not that a new scheme was devised. it's that the circumstances are allowing a wise-but-difficult-to-implement scheme to be used. i agree that coaching matters here, too--i'm just not sure i've seen or heard anything in the actual scheme that seems philosophically new. the reason not everyone does this is they don't have the things you listed above. not that they couldn't have thought of the plan. there are lots of things i know how to do but can't because i don't have the tools or resources.