2022-23 Team Developments: News / Trades / Free Agents / Rumors

Discussion in 'Lakers Discussion' started by BangBoomPow, Jun 3, 2021.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Weezy

    Weezy Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    18,703
    Likes Received:
    75,884
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Anaheim
    Offline
    I’m fine with trading THT for Beverly to be clear, we needed a PG and he is a solid one, a vet we lack. I’m not fine just tossing in Stan. He’s not amazing, but he’s a spark off the bench player, a momentum shifter, he's another Caruso type we just threw away. I do not understand Rob’s mentality sometimes, he loses EVERY, SINGLE, DEAL he makes.
     
  2. Azndude2190

    Azndude2190 - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Messages:
    1,588
    Likes Received:
    3,919
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
  3. 432J

    432J - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    6,905
    Likes Received:
    15,287
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I don't have a problem with bringing pat in, it's giving up on THT that pisses me off. I don't believe for a second that beverley is all he's worth
     
  4. Cookie

    Cookie The Dame of Doom Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2015
    Messages:
    4,366
    Likes Received:
    21,686
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    This trade sucks. I hate Pat Bev and I’m tired of just giving away young players.
     
    Banner18, Barnstable, TIME and 10 others like this.
  5. Cookie

    Cookie The Dame of Doom Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2015
    Messages:
    4,366
    Likes Received:
    21,686
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Nobody in their right mind is giving up picks for Pat Bev, that’s just dumb Jazz talking.
     
  6. Azndude2190

    Azndude2190 - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Messages:
    1,588
    Likes Received:
    3,919
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    What the hell happened to being patient? This reeks of desperation.
     
  7. 432J

    432J - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    6,905
    Likes Received:
    15,287
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    it has to be a precursor to a russ trade because there's no way those two will play together and i really hope rob isn't this clueless
     
    lakerjones likes this.
  8. OX1947

    OX1947 - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2016
    Messages:
    8,302
    Likes Received:
    17,646
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    We have to look at this f*** who literally looks like he slept in one of those green mulch and grass clipping bins the city gives you. That's what we got. Trash bin Beverley representing the Lakers.
     
    Last edited: Aug 24, 2022
    Kenzo, svtzr and lakerjones like this.
  9. CarolinaLakerFan

    CarolinaLakerFan - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2014
    Messages:
    1,957
    Likes Received:
    6,038
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    South Carolina
    Offline
    Seems to me it would’ve made far more sense to add Gabriel instead of Stan since we’ll already have a logjam at center if we add Turner.
     
    Barnstable, lakerjones and Weezy like this.
  10. KareemtheGreat33

    KareemtheGreat33 - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    11,808
    Likes Received:
    23,964
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Brow-beater
    Location:
    Las Islas Filipinas
    Offline
    I will now watch if Russ will not be traded.:Laugh:This will be a pile of dog****:LLLLLebronlaughing:
     
    ElginTheGreat likes this.
  11. OX1947

    OX1947 - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2016
    Messages:
    8,302
    Likes Received:
    17,646
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Dude, I wouldn't trade two dog s***s and a bowl of piss for Russell Westbrook. You think NBA GMs will? Without trying to fleece every conceivable asset that matters? It's over.

    Starting f***ing lineup will be Westbrook, f*** face, lebron, AD and Damian Jones.
     
    KareemtheGreat33 likes this.
  12. OX1947

    OX1947 - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2016
    Messages:
    8,302
    Likes Received:
    17,646
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    It's because we aren't getting Turner. I don't get how bringing in that clown means the Lakers are trading for Turner and Hield. Why would you need Beverley you are gonna get Hield who plays the 2?
     
  13. Khmrp

    Khmrp - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2016
    Messages:
    12,136
    Likes Received:
    13,854
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    cant defend rob anymore....trash gm, barely watch last season with the troll Bev here now, watch nothing if i dont have to
     
    Last edited: Aug 24, 2022
  14. OX1947

    OX1947 - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2016
    Messages:
    8,302
    Likes Received:
    17,646
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    The bevelery trade was to clear space for next year. Got nothing to do with moves that are coming next. Lakers cleared salary beyond 2023 with THT being sent out. Stanley was just a filler to make the money work. That's it.

    Utah made the trade because they don't need Beverley and they take a chance on a 21 year old.

    That's it. That's all this was for both teams.
     
  15. Helljumper

    Helljumper - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    4,933
    Likes Received:
    14,677
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Offline
    I’m talking about second round picks.

    I definitely think the Jazz could have eventually traded Pat Bev elsewhere for a second round pick (or two). And I can understand why fans of a rebuilding Jazz team would rather have a package that included second rounders over THT, given how disappointing he was this past season and his contract situation.

    THT definitely did NOT have significantly more value than this. I don’t know where that idea was coming from. We were looking at trading him for Terrence Ross type players the past trade deadline, and he didn’t really improve much since then; plus now his contract situation is even less desirable.

    I get why some fans would have an emotional attachment to THT. He’s been one of our only young players the past few seasons and he’s shown glimmers of potential. But put yourself in the shoes of another team’s fanbase or GM: he just hasn’t shown to be a rotation level NBA player yet. We can make all the excuses about fit and role, but other teams aren’t going to give him that benefit of the doubt.
     
    LTLakerFan likes this.
  16. LaVarBallsDad

    LaVarBallsDad - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    16,172
    Likes Received:
    31,056
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Probably a precursor to another move me thinks.
     
  17. lakerjones

    lakerjones Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    10,752
    Likes Received:
    31,992
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    La La land
    Offline
    I have no attachment to THT. But I do have for Stan Johnson. That’s what adds salt in the wound. That and having to watch BevMo on our team. Horrible.
     
  18. Cookie

    Cookie The Dame of Doom Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2015
    Messages:
    4,366
    Likes Received:
    21,686
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I think THT had more value then Pat Bev. He’s 21 freaking years old. So you and I will just have to agree to disagree there. When THT catches fires against us and Bev gets kicked out with 2 techs it will just be icing on the cake of this s***ty trade.
     
  19. Helljumper

    Helljumper - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    4,933
    Likes Received:
    14,677
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Offline
    I was thinking the same, but for some reason THT and Wenyen for Beverly wasn’t working in the ESPN trade machine. I’m not sure if his non-guaranteed salary doesn’t count towards outgoing trade matching or something?

    Depending on the return on a possible Russ trade though, it’s possible we may have wanted to open multiple roster spots. So doing the Utah trade as a 2 for 1, and then still having Wenyen’s non guaranteed deal to cut, may have been the objective.

    A dream scenario I have would be a Russ trade for Hield/Turner, but somehow gets rolled into a multi-team deal that also brings in Cam Reddish. I think something like that would explain giving up Stanley, because he wouldn’t really have a spot in the rotation anyways.

    Beverly / Nunn
    Hield / Reaves / Walker
    Lebron / Reddish / Brown
    AD / JTA
    Turner / Bryant / Jones

    I could get behind that, ESPECIALLY if Mr. Rambis latest post about us trying hard to make the Indiana trade with only one FRP ends up happening
     
    Last edited: Aug 25, 2022
    CarolinaLakerFan likes this.
  20. alam1108

    alam1108 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    13,585
    Likes Received:
    37,190
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Laker Land
    Offline
    I brought up Pat Bev awhile ago and I’m perfectly fine with trading THT for him but why tf did we throw in Stan for… now we still NEED to add size on the wing.

    At least this probably means we’re making a Russ trade right? And if its truly about capspace plan then won’t be Indy and Hields contract
     
    ElginTheGreat likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page