2015 Nba Draft Discussion: Russell, Nance Jr., Brown

Discussion in 'Lakers Discussion' started by LaVarBallsDad, Oct 14, 2014.

  1. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Say the draft order ends up like this:

    1. Orlando
    2. Minnesota
    3. Lakers
    4. New York
    5. Philadelphia
    6. Sacramento
    7. Charlotte
    8. Detroit
    9. Denver
    10. Philadelphia

    The first two picks are Towns and Mudiay. Would you trade #3 for #5 and #10?
     
  2. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    27,681
    Likes Received:
    74,749
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    as far as data, i'd argue there's more useful info on hezonja (in terms of play against better competition) than johnson or winslow. it's just that WE haven't seen as much.
     
  3. Punk-101

    Punk-101 - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    2,864
    Likes Received:
    7,842
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Did you type that right? You mean trade the chance to draft Okafor for 5 & 10?
     
  4. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Yeah that's what I'm sayin'. Just wanted to see what everyone thought. In this scenario you could end up with maybe Stan Johnson and Willie Cauley-Stein. Is that enough to off-set anyone from Okafor?
     
  5. ElginTheGreat

    ElginTheGreat - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    10,813
    Likes Received:
    29,961
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    That would be tough to pass on. Those two could be defensive anchors on this team for the next ten years and I like the thought of a guy like Stanley being able to learn under Kobe for a year.

    It would really depend on whether or not the scouts thought Okafor could be a true superstar. And by that I mean top 10 to 20 in the league good. That's the only way I think you pass on that kind of trade.
     
  6. Punk-101

    Punk-101 - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    2,864
    Likes Received:
    7,842
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    If you had a crystal ball and could guarantee Winslow+WCS, I might do it...but probably not. There's no guarantee WCS lasts till 10. You might end up with Winslow and Kaminski or Porzinga. Drafting Okafor gets you a starting center for $4mil rather than $18mil. Can't pass that up.
     
  7. Battle Tested20

    Battle Tested20 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    9,213
    Likes Received:
    24,866
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Technical Data Analyst
    Location:
    Fair Oaks, CA
    Offline
    Yes, I would be down to do this. I've never really been high on him despite being a top 2 pick.
     
  8. ElginTheGreat

    ElginTheGreat - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    10,813
    Likes Received:
    29,961
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline

    A lot of mocks have Stanley dropping to around 9 to 12. So in theory, you could grab Cauley-Stein at 5 and Johnson at 10.
     
  9. Punk-101

    Punk-101 - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    2,864
    Likes Received:
    7,842
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    That's true. How about the best defensive perimeter in the league with Winslow and Johnson at sg/sf?
     
  10. ElginTheGreat

    ElginTheGreat - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    10,813
    Likes Received:
    29,961
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I thought about that as well. I would definitely do it if we could get both of them.
     
    Kenzo likes this.
  11. Savory Griddles

    Savory Griddles Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Messages:
    9,152
    Likes Received:
    22,367
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    No. While tempting, I'd rather we snag Okafor and hopefully lockdown our bigs for the next decade. Okafor, at worst, is probably a 20 and 8 guy for most of career. Too many questions around the guys you could get at 5 and 10. Intriguing question, but no.
     
  12. JSM

    JSM - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    17,643
    Likes Received:
    68,478
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I wouldn't. Okafor is better than what you'll get there. I like our young guys and building the right way, but with two top 10 picks you're making them even younger with lesser talent than what's at 3 and with one guy who probably isn't NBA ready.

    I'd sit on the 3. If we want to climb back into the first, see what magic Mitch can work with the few assets we have. Otherwise take BPA and get ready for FA.

    Also in that scenario, I see Philly more likely to strike a deal with NY. Russell, their guy (if reports are true), would be there at 4. No need to deal with us.
     
  13. JSM

    JSM - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    17,643
    Likes Received:
    68,478
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Wow, frankly I'd be shocked to see us have Okafor outside of the top two. That's the same top 3 I have for us, just wrong order.

    Damn, that'd be a great get for the Heat.

     
    therealdeal and TIME like this.
  14. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Ford is the only guy still super high on Porzingis. I don't want anything to do with him.
     
    TIME likes this.
  15. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    27,681
    Likes Received:
    74,749
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    don't like what I've seen from porzingis. doesn't look athletic at all, and looks too thin to be a power player. not a shooter like dirk, either.
     
    TIME likes this.
  16. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    From what I've seen he's pretty naturally athletic, but he's too skinny for it to matter. When he's got no one near him he can rise up and dunk nicely, but he's only 210 lbs. What the f*** is that?? That's way way way too light for an NBA Center. Really it's too light for an NBA PF too which puts him in a weird spot. Throw in that while he's got a clean looking stroke he's not a prolific scorer... What does this guy do in the NBA?
     
  17. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    27,681
    Likes Received:
    74,749
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    maybe I need to watch more film, but he looked mechanical compared to his (overly generous) comps of ak47 and dirk. looks like a poor man's hybrid of the two.

    good news is i don't think the lakers will have a shot at him. no way he's top 5.

    as for trading for picks 5 and 10...that's dangerous in this draft. i think there's 8-9 players (okafor, towns, Russell, mudiay, winslow, wcs, hezonja, Johnson, maybe porzingis if you believe chad ford). if nobody reaches, you're looking at a kaminsky at 10, which, as I've said before, does not excite me. I'd rather take my chance with the high pick unless i can make a deal contingent on BOTH of my guys being available. doubt that's possible, as it's asking a lot of the trade partner.
     
  18. Savory Griddles

    Savory Griddles Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Messages:
    9,152
    Likes Received:
    22,367
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    As far as Real's hypothetical trade scenario, I will refer to the late great Dr. Buss. When Kobe was throwing a temper tantrum and wanted to be traded Dr. Buss explained to him why he wouldn't do it.

    "Kobe, if I had a diamond of great value, four karats, would I give up that diamond for four diamonds of one karat? No."

    Okafor has the chance at being a franchise player; a 22-10 center that can play next to the potential star pf we drafted last year for the next decade. You don't trade that for a chance at two real good players.
     
    Battle Tested20, TIME and therealdeal like this.
  19. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    For a kid his size he's fairly fluid with his shot. The problem is his lack of coordination because he has very little muscle. Opposition would say Durant is thin too, but Durant has a lot of wiry, fast-twitch muscle despite his lack of size. And even using that example, Durant is now quite injured and has always been prone to injury.

    I have absolutely no interest in Porzingis.

    As for my scenario... I was just curious to see what people thought of Okafor's worth and what people thought of the talent later in the draft.
     
  20. lakerfan2

    lakerfan2 - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2014
    Messages:
    5,220
    Likes Received:
    10,105
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Simi Valley
    Offline
    It's hard to say no to a sure shot offensive player like Okafor. I don't think I could do that, even if it meant being able to snag WCS and Johnson.

    I think the immediate impact of Okafor is the deciding factor. Although WCS would translate well defensively, I think he still has a ways in terms of getting stronger and adapting to NBA size. Stan I think still needs some polishing to do to get to the level we think he can get. Whereas I think Okafor's size is already above the level of most NBA centers already, his impact I think will be almost immediate. I think his high IQ and being under Coach K will allow him to adjust seamlessly. Also, I like to think that the floor for Okafor at worst a player who can put up 15 ppg.

    I just don't take that chance.
     

Share This Page