DRAFT TALK Thread: Looking Like Lonzo

Discussion in 'Lakers Discussion' started by Lakerman JSJ, May 9, 2017.

  1. KRL

    KRL - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2016
    Messages:
    1,369
    Likes Received:
    1,190
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    We already know Lonzo is going to the league and will be a top pick.

    Gelo will be lucky to be drafted unless he becomes Charles Barkley or loses 40 pounds.

    Melo is the interesting one, last read he was 6'3" or 6'4". Wonder if he's done growing or will ultimately hit 6'6" like his bros. the kid just from highlights has great handles and killer range. Like his dad said he could be the best of three
     
    John3:16 likes this.
  2. Khmrp

    Khmrp - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2016
    Messages:
    12,084
    Likes Received:
    13,820
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Man all this ball hype...if dude isnt a duplicate of magic off the bat ill be disappointed....so 18/7/7 nothing less, krl?
     
    sirronstuff likes this.
  3. KRL

    KRL - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2016
    Messages:
    1,369
    Likes Received:
    1,190
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    28/12/12
     
    sirronstuff and Khmrp like this.
  4. Khmrp

    Khmrp - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2016
    Messages:
    12,084
    Likes Received:
    13,820
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Im gona hold ball to that expectation lol
     
    sirronstuff likes this.
  5. KRL

    KRL - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2016
    Messages:
    1,369
    Likes Received:
    1,190
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    MVP - ROY -1st ALL NBA
     
    sirronstuff likes this.
  6. SFGOLDRUSHER

    SFGOLDRUSHER - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2014
    Messages:
    3,094
    Likes Received:
    2,181
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Master Optimist.
    Location:
    San Diego
    Offline
    Lol. That's something Lavar would say and everyone would be trippin. I more so meant that's what he'd say to your state line haha.
     
  7. sirronstuff

    sirronstuff - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    31,623
    Likes Received:
    76,935
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Your time is running out Ham
    Location:
    Laker Purgatory
    Offline
    He should also get some Hall of Fame votes if he's worth his salt.

    No excuses.
     
    Khmrp likes this.
  8. trodgers

    trodgers Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    12,127
    Likes Received:
    18,496
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Professor of Humanities
    Location:
    Orlando
    Online
    Ball: 36-24-36

    I would really do a lot of work to see about moving the pick - are more picks available for the 2? Can the 2 help us land a solid player and dump salary? Can it land us an all-star? Boston does what it wants, and we react. It's not a worry from my point of view.
     
    abeer3, Barnstable and gcclaker like this.
  9. tada

    tada - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2014
    Messages:
    4,467
    Likes Received:
    8,535
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    If the FO believes the pick lands us a star, we aren't moving the pick. Two solid players do not equal a star. Nor does a solid player and a salary dump.
     
  10. John3:16

    John3:16 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    6,590
    Likes Received:
    15,641
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    CEO - Big Baller Brand
    Offline
    With those numbers he'll be on the cover of PlayBoy.
     
    ZenMaster, Punk-101 and sirronstuff like this.
  11. Khmrp

    Khmrp - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2016
    Messages:
    12,084
    Likes Received:
    13,820
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I think if fultz fall to 2, i do think we'll have alot of options. For sure phi and sac would want fultz. If phi i do fultz for #3 and better of phi or our 18' 1st. If sac id do 2/28/moz for 5/10/kuofus. I think phi n sac trade could still net us ball, less chance with sac trade since phi or pho might take ball
     
  12. sirronstuff

    sirronstuff - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    31,623
    Likes Received:
    76,935
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Your time is running out Ham
    Location:
    Laker Purgatory
    Offline
    :Laugh:
     
    John3:16 likes this.
  13. OmarE

    OmarE - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2014
    Messages:
    2,753
    Likes Received:
    7,340
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Anaheim, CA
    Offline
    I understand that we want a sure thing all Star right away, however with gs and clev running the West and East, why are we in a rush to trade youth and talent for players that are older and already reached their ceiling. I say roll the dice and continue to groom with accountability to our young guys including the two picks in this draft. When those super teams start to decline we'll be the champion contenders due to all our young talent barely hitting their primes
     
    CarolinaLakerFan and ZenMaster like this.
  14. Khmrp

    Khmrp - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2016
    Messages:
    12,084
    Likes Received:
    13,820
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Theres plenty of examples of teams trading down n still getting their guy while obtaining more assets. Phi did it 3 yrs ago, they drafted Payton even though MCW just came off a ROY season, forcing Orl hand to trade up only 1 spot but they gave phi back their future 1st from a prior trade and Phi now has what seems to be the better player as well in Saric
     
  15. Khmrp

    Khmrp - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2016
    Messages:
    12,084
    Likes Received:
    13,820
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Building only through youth doesn't guarantee success, i know most will use gsw as example but that is rare, hell okc and por (oden/roy/aldridge) looked like future dynasty in the making
     
    Last edited: May 28, 2017
  16. trodgers

    trodgers Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    12,127
    Likes Received:
    18,496
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Professor of Humanities
    Location:
    Orlando
    Online
    I agree with that claim, but I don't think that's how building a roster works.

    Some players come with pros and cons that don't show up immediately. Big Baby and Kendrick Perkins weren't good players, but they made Boston an exceptionally good team. LO wasn't an all-star, but he made us a championship team with the pieces around him.

    I'm not convinced that any one player in this draft is a likely star, but the odds are that there are a few stars in the draft (I hope that makes sense, statistically). So, suppose Ball has a 40% chance of being a star, but we could also trade down to get two players who would be salary-controlled for five years and are above average NBA players - that might be the better move depending upon pieces. Dropping a huge salary to open up space to sign players around George and an emerging start or two (BI and, say, DAR), would be better than taking a chance on Ball.
     
    Barnstable and Khmrp like this.
  17. trodgers

    trodgers Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    12,127
    Likes Received:
    18,496
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Professor of Humanities
    Location:
    Orlando
    Online
    I was thinking of the Violent Femmes song :)
     
    abeer3 likes this.
  18. alam1108

    alam1108 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    13,585
    Likes Received:
    37,190
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Laker Land
    Offline
  19. Khmrp

    Khmrp - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2016
    Messages:
    12,084
    Likes Received:
    13,820
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    thats odd considering his shooting weakness.....I dont see how he's better than Fultz, unless its those "intangible" like winning attitude type, since Fultz criticism seems to be he doesn't care bout winning as long as he get his, I can understand the thought Fox could be better than Ball due to the speed/handles/defense
     
  20. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I've been seeing and hearing this stuff everywhere. I'm really wondering what I'm missing. The kid has wonderful tools and seems like a hard worker, but his offense is not going to come easily. He shot 37% from deep in college, but he didn't exactly exhibit much NBA range and his shot form is the definition of inconsistency. I like Jackson, but not that much. Not enough to go crazy over.

    edit- wait what? I thought you posted a tweet about Josh Jackson... my bad.

    Fox is not the best guard in this draft. :D
     
    Last edited: May 28, 2017

Share This Page