Shaq Only Showed 30% Of His Game....

Discussion in 'Lakers Discussion' started by sirronstuff, Sep 7, 2016.

  1. gcclaker

    gcclaker Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    8,993
    Likes Received:
    20,463
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Wherever I am at the moment...
    Offline
    I never saw the Stilt play in his prime. I did see Olajuwon so I can see the argument. My point is size wise O'Neal was the most nimble big man I ever saw in open space. Olajuwon had a lighter frame more like a 4 nowadays. I've never seen him take the rock off the glass and run the break down the middle like O'Neal has. All that mass with agility, power and speed to boot.

    I'll concede though Olajuwon was far superior on defense. He had better footwork too in tighter confines because of his soccer training...
     
    lakerjones likes this.
  2. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Yeah I've watched Kareem play. I don't disagree with everything you said. Kareem's knowledge of the game (and just knowledge in general) was transcendent.

    But you can only do so much against the raw power that Shaq possessed. In Shaq's prime when he was the perfect combination of size and speed (probably 00-02 or so) there was nothing anybody could do to stop him around the rim. Shaq would have backed Kareem under the rim just like everyone else. Now of course Kareem would be able to find his spots on the floor and score the same way he always did. However, a dunk is a higher percentage shot even than the Skyhook.

    Over time, Kareem is a far better Center and if I'm building a franchise I want Kareem before any other player in history including Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant and equal maybe only to Magic Johnson. But if we're talking about one game or one season or one playoff series, the player I want above any other ever is Shaquille O'Neal circa 1999-2001. That was the most dominant force I've ever seen on a basketball court.
     
  3. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I think the only way that game ends is when both of them are hurt.

    Wilt might have been the only guy I believe could have consistently held his ground against Shaq. The other difference was mentality. Wilt didn't like dunking the ball. If he was playing against Shaq that might change, but Shaq was just meaner on the floor.
     
  4. TIME

    TIME Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    5,799
    Likes Received:
    22,702
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Lifelong Lakers fan.
    Location:
    LaLa Land
    Online
    My post was a response to yours implying that Kareem only was better due to longevity and durability. I think Kareem was better by almost every way we evaluate bigs. However, that said, I do think prime Shaq would give prime Kareem fits with his power game. The only center I ever saw dominate Kareem was Moses Malone and he did it with power and meanness.
     
  5. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I'm with ya. At the peak of his powers I don't think there has ever been a player like Shaq. Wilt is closest, but the problem was Wilt didn't want to bang and dunk on guys. He really wanted to be a finesse player. I think the physicality of Shaq would have brought out the monster in Wilt, but first blood goes to Shaq. He was a fun guy off the floor, but once his feet hit hard wood Shaq turned into the baddest man on the planet.
     
    lakerjones, TIME and gcclaker like this.
  6. LTLakerFan

    LTLakerFan - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    36,396
    Likes Received:
    60,555
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    So Cal
    Offline
    Walton's first years in the league before all the foot problems, he often to me seemed to give Kareem all he could handle and outplayed him at times.
     
    Kenzo likes this.
  7. OX1947

    OX1947 - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2016
    Messages:
    8,275
    Likes Received:
    17,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Ya, and 75% of the time full of s***.
     
  8. OX1947

    OX1947 - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2016
    Messages:
    8,275
    Likes Received:
    17,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Moses Malone use to manhandle Kareem. If Shaq was playing Kareem back then, Kareem would have been a fly to Shaq.

    As far as putting Shaq after Kareem, unfortunately I cant do that. Had Shaq won in 95 and 04, you could argue for #1. He would have been 6-0 in the finals. At least 4 Finals MVPs and would have led 3 teams to NBA titles. It sucks because Shaq's team were favorite in both those loses so, it was a lost opportunity.
     
  9. ZenMaster

    ZenMaster - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    6,023
    Likes Received:
    13,382
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Well, this what happens when Ben Wallace makes you his ....
     
    abeer3 likes this.
  10. Kou

    Kou - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2015
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    2,507
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Shoulda, woulda, coulda.
     
  11. Kenzo

    Kenzo - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    7,608
    Likes Received:
    15,933
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Poland
    Offline
    No force like Shaq, period. In todays NBA, he wouldn't make it past half time though. All these elbows to poors Dikembe and Ricks faces...
     
  12. KB24

    KB24 Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    3,159
    Likes Received:
    8,286
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Certified Tax Advisor
    Location:
    Germany
    Offline
    Shaq showed 100% but only for like 3-4 years...sadly he didn't show it long enough.
     
    Battle Tested20 and sirronstuff like this.
  13. sirronstuff

    sirronstuff - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    31,598
    Likes Received:
    76,892
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Your time is running out Ham
    Location:
    Laker Purgatory
    Offline
    Wilt once averaged over 48 min in a season.

    Snaq could never have done that
     
    LTLakerFan likes this.
  14. sirronstuff

    sirronstuff - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    31,598
    Likes Received:
    76,892
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Your time is running out Ham
    Location:
    Laker Purgatory
    Offline
    I'd say 2 years at 100%. 3-4 is being very generous. You are a most kind fan.
     
  15. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    True, but he didn't do it though and Kareem did win 6 titles in 10 Finals appearances. That's a preposterous amount of success.

    Kareem is the greatest player of all time in my opinion because of his longevity and effectiveness over 20 years of basketball service. He had 6 MVPs (they changed the rules so he couldn't win anymore), 2 Finals MVPs, 4 time block leader, 19 All-Star appearances, 15 times All-NBA, 11 times All-Defense... There's nobody in the NBA who enjoyed more success for a longer period of time.

    At their peaks, Shaq would have beaten Kareem, but over time Kareem is better. Shaq had the opportunity to be better and he couldn't figure out how to make it work. If you asked him, he'd admit he left too much on the table and that's something that cannot be said for guys like Kareem and Kobe and Bird. Magic left a lot on the table too considering how much the HIV cut his career short. Some of that is outside his control, but it is what it is.
     
  16. OX1947

    OX1947 - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2016
    Messages:
    8,275
    Likes Received:
    17,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    You know they've done studies. Shaq showed 60% of the time, every time.
     
  17. LTLakerFan

    LTLakerFan - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    36,396
    Likes Received:
    60,555
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    So Cal
    Offline
    Sure OX. To the neophyte Shaq watchers. I however had him at 52.36%. Either way, like you say about Bill "throw it down Big Man" Walton .... about 75% full of s*** with his 30% comments the other day. :Laugh:


    :Beertoast2:
     
    OX1947 and sirronstuff like this.
  18. gcclaker

    gcclaker Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    8,993
    Likes Received:
    20,463
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Wherever I am at the moment...
    Offline
    "I'd like to thank Kobe Bryant, a guy that pushed me to three titles -- and then pushed me off the team and got me traded," O'Neal

    ...sigh. Still hurt after all these years even if the line was delivered as a joke.
     
    sirronstuff likes this.
  19. LTLakerFan

    LTLakerFan - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    36,396
    Likes Received:
    60,555
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    So Cal
    Offline
    Woah .... wait did they have the induction and he said that?? I didn't know when the date was. F*** you Shaq. Poor taste.
     
    ZenMaster likes this.
  20. sirronstuff

    sirronstuff - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    31,598
    Likes Received:
    76,892
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Your time is running out Ham
    Location:
    Laker Purgatory
    Offline
    Petty athlete is petty
     

Share This Page