So... Draft Prospects?

Discussion in 'Lakers Discussion' started by ShowTime_IR, Nov 21, 2015.

  1. TheGreatOneKobe

    TheGreatOneKobe - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2015
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    431
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Offline
    We might be anxious but think of all the top 3 prospects. They could either be a Laker or play for some s*** organization like Philly.

    Bet you Simmons and Ingram will be glued to the tv
     
    therealdeal and Weezy like this.
  2. Battle Tested20

    Battle Tested20 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    9,213
    Likes Received:
    24,866
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Technical Data Analyst
    Location:
    Fair Oaks, CA
    Offline
    One or both of them will probably be in the audience watching it Live.
     
  3. fabfourlakers

    fabfourlakers - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2014
    Messages:
    3,602
    Likes Received:
    8,202
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I think what will piss me off more than anything is if the following happens:

    We drop to 4th, pick goes to Sixers
    Boston moves up and gets 1st pick OR Denver moves up and gets 1st pick
    Sixers get 1st and 4th picks
    Minnesota wins the lotto again

    The major insult to injury would be us losing the pick and then Boston winning the lotto..yep, that's literally the worst case scenario.
     
    alam1108 likes this.
  4. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    1. Boston
    2. Minnesota
    3. Philadelphia
    4. Philadelphia

    I think that's the worst case scenario for us, right?
     
    Weezy likes this.
  5. fabfourlakers

    fabfourlakers - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2014
    Messages:
    3,602
    Likes Received:
    8,202
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Worst case for me personally would be:

    1. Boston
    2. Denver
    3. Philly
    4. Philly

    Because my cousin is a huge Nuggets fan and he was talking a lot of smack about D'Angelo and how Mudiay is better than him....and last thing I want is Denver getting Ingram or Simmons to pair up with Mudiay and Jokic. They also have 2 more first round picks in this draft. I just don't want to see Mudiay and Denver become a great team.

    Another scenario could be this:

    1. Boston
    2. Denver
    3. Minnesota
    4. Philly
    5. Philly

    That's equally bad....man I Just want Boston to slip to 5th or 6th....that would be amazing.
     
  6. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Well in my scenario the Wolves build a dynasty around Wiggins, Towns, and Ingram/Simmons that we have a hard time matching up with for the next 10-15 years.

    Boston gets the #1 pick. Gross.

    And Philly gets rewarded with two Top 5 picks despite being the most despicable team in professional sports for the last 3-5 years or so.

    If that happens tomorrow I'll have a hard time being okay with the NBA. Not just because we get screwed, but because there'd be no justice there. Just bad news again for the Lakers.
     
  7. fabfourlakers

    fabfourlakers - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2014
    Messages:
    3,602
    Likes Received:
    8,202
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Shoot. Great point on Minnesota. I didn't think about that. But they'll have kind of a logjam at the SF spot no? I guess they could play Lavine at PG, Wiggins at SG, Ingram at SF? Or they go KAT, Ingram, Wiggins, Lavine, Rubio? They'll have options to go big or small....maybe they go with Simmons then at the 4 (but not a lot of shooting then around KAT and Wiggins....)

    In conclusion, we just need to keep the god damn pick!
     
  8. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    You go Rubio/Lavine/Wiggins/Simmons/Towns or Rubio/Lavine/Ingram/Wiggins/Towns. Wiggins is undersized, but does it really matter? Ingram and Wiggins switch off and use their length and athleticism around the perimeter... Yikes.
     
  9. OmarE

    OmarE - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2014
    Messages:
    2,753
    Likes Received:
    7,340
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Anaheim, CA
    Offline
  10. LTLakerFan

    LTLakerFan - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    36,732
    Likes Received:
    61,069
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    So Cal
    Offline
    Yes please.
     
  11. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I know what everyone sees in Simmons. He's clearly got a ton of natural talent, but I like Ingram. I think Ingram might be the more natural all-around player.
     
  12. unpossibl1

    unpossibl1 - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    597
    Likes Received:
    1,127
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Offline
  13. alam1108

    alam1108 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    13,585
    Likes Received:
    37,190
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Laker Land
    Offline
    Brooklyn really messed up here. Boston who made it to the playoffs, have a chance at a top pick this year.
     
  14. KareemtheGreat33

    KareemtheGreat33 - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    11,828
    Likes Received:
    24,003
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Brow-beater
    Location:
    Las Islas Filipinas
    Offline
    Brooklyn was stupider than Mitch when it comes to pick protection.
     
  15. TheGreatOneKobe

    TheGreatOneKobe - Rookie -

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2015
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    431
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Offline
    LTLakerFan likes this.
  16. Lakers2015

    Lakers2015 - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2015
    Messages:
    3,634
    Likes Received:
    6,103
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Battle Tested20 likes this.
  17. tada

    tada - Lakers All Star -

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2014
    Messages:
    4,467
    Likes Received:
    8,535
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    Yeah worst case for me would be the Wolves getting the Top 2. KAT and Wiggins is already a dynamic duo. Add Simmons/Ingram with Thibs at the helm and they'd be the next GSW.

    Philly and Boston getting the #1 would suck too but they're in the East and Philly will screw up somehow anyway.
     
    therealdeal likes this.
  18. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    They honestly might already be. We'll see in a few years, but they've got a hell of a start over there.
     
  19. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I mean we've known that for a while though haven't we? Most of the young players want to be here. When you're young you can imagine being that guy who can rebuild the brand and who can capitalize on all that media/marketing opportunity. When you're a vet it's a much harder proposition. Guys as young as 27-28 already hear their clock ticking.
     
  20. Chillbongo

    Chillbongo - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    1,103
    Likes Received:
    1,356
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Offline
    If we keep our pick and don't trade it I want Ingram. I was high on Simmons before but I think Ingram makes an impact quicker.

    Simmons will need development. There's no guarantee he'll be a special player. Plus Ingram would be so great in our new offense and he can play both on and off the ball, while Simmons basically needs the ball to be effective.
     
    Weezy likes this.

Share This Page