LABron James Discussion: 21st Season - Setting New Standards

Discussion in 'Lakers Discussion' started by therealdeal, Jun 8, 2017.

  1. vasashi17

    vasashi17 LB's Resident Capologist

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    6,591
    Likes Received:
    20,201
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    No khmrp that is not what I said and I apologize if you took it as such.

    I'm saying that you have credible insiders stating that there is interest in the Lakers when it comes to the 2018 free agent crop. Now it could be mere coincidence (I'm speculating that it is not) that the timing of these rumors align directly with the outing of Jim/Mitch. I also find it intriguing that Magic is a public figure and has no problem communicating with the public, while Jimmy and Mitch were reportedly standoffish and squeamish to address the media. If you're an insider, you're probably going to get your "in" with Magic/Pelinka as opposed to Jim/Mitch. That doesn't make Magic and Pelinka credible, however when it comes to Laker rumors by a credible insider, it holds alot more value to me, as opposed to when rumors would come out from the tight-lipped and close to the vest Mitch/Jimbo regime. During that time, I didn't hear much if anything from credible insiders in terms to Lakers rumors.

    So to reiterate, you got a FO that is now more readily accessible to the media and insiders. However it is the insiders that have a great track record that I'm labeling as credible. I'm not taking about Broussard, Stephen A, David Aldridge, Eric Pincus, some random internet troll, etc. I'm talking about guys that have the "sources" and have normally nailed the rumors they forecast. (Woj, Sham Stein, etc).


    Day before deal was officially called off by Stern:

    Nailed it!

    Even before the Feb. '16 trade deadline, and way before KD even became a free agent that coming summer.
    Nailed it!

    So at last season's trade deadline, how is Woj going to say that LA has cap-space to sign PG when at the time we had Moz still on the books and could only offer around $25M at the most (not the max) for PG?
    OKC shied away at the '17 trade deadline, but they ignored the warning during the '17 summer...I guess this one is TBD, but I'm pretty sure in a year's time he's going to nail this one too.

    As if dropping the WojBomb on the DLo trade wasn't enough...Oh would you look at that, we create more cap space to now sign another player along with PG. And even before we drafted Zo, Woj had a sense of what LA was trying to do. Its crazy how he knew this projection months in advance...its almost like someone told him what our end-game plan was.

    Nailed the Zo pick (but that's pretty obvious)...lets see if he nails the rest of it next summer. (spoiler alert: he will!)


    So Magic with that whole 6th man of the year challenge could be upping JC's trade value. Randle wasn't extended after all....and we shut down Deng, so it looks like a stretch is forthcoming.

    BTW whatevers been said, seems to have already transpired or is projected to...again, not all talk!
     
  2. Khmrp

    Khmrp - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2016
    Messages:
    11,855
    Likes Received:
    13,584
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    vash i get your pt...but none of this gurantees anything, all of magic move just gives him a "chance" at signing pg/lebron, my stance is that until we see this signing actually happen, its all talk to me
     
  3. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    25,703
    Likes Received:
    69,919
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    we've been over this, but they're not signing him. they're trading for him. just like they did for paul, which no one saw coming. lebron has a player option. he can opt in on the condition he's traded for ryan anderson or whatever. this can so happen. teams with talent rule. the lakers don't have it--they used to...and they ruled. it's why the cp3 trade veto basically ended the franchise.
     
  4. LTLakerFan

    LTLakerFan - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    34,633
    Likes Received:
    58,138
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    So Cal
    Offline
    [​IMG]
     
    sirronstuff likes this.
  5. Khmrp

    Khmrp - Lakers MVP -

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2016
    Messages:
    11,855
    Likes Received:
    13,584
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    clev would be better off letring james leave for nothing than straddle themselves with anderson contract, same situation as nyk n melo, they werent gona eat it with anderson
     
    Cookie, therealdeal and sirronstuff like this.
  6. sirronstuff

    sirronstuff - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    30,233
    Likes Received:
    74,597
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Making you asset free AND happy by 2030
    Location:
    Davos, Switzerland
    Offline
  7. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    This is where I'm at. What is the benefit for Cleveland in that scenario? I could see if maybe Houston signed and traded Clint Capela, but the sign and trade rules are really complicated and trying to make it work with two teams above the salary cap would be difficult.

    The Rockets would have to find a way to dump their high contracts somewhere else, so the question is: why would anyone help them by taking on assets that are so overpaid? And once LeBron forced his way there, what team would be waiting for him? There's basically zero chance of having Chris Paul there unless Chris Paul took a massive pay cut, but if he did do that then it's Harden, Paul, and James and there wouldn't be anybody else worth a damn on that roster. Some minimum veterans chasing rings or something probably, but that's it.

    The Lakers may not have James Harden, but they'd have a solid group of young depth and the ability to go get another max guy and potentially have enough money to get even another veteran piece on top of that. I just don't see the allure to Houston for LeBron.
     
    LTLakerFan likes this.
  8. KuzmoBall17

    KuzmoBall17 - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2017
    Messages:
    1,960
    Likes Received:
    3,664
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    So now Tristan Thompson is injured.
    So When LeBron is going to demand trade to Lakers ?:Noddingyes:
     
  9. sirronstuff

    sirronstuff - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    30,233
    Likes Received:
    74,597
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Making you asset free AND happy by 2030
    Location:
    Davos, Switzerland
    Offline
    The Kardashian Kurse continues?
     
    alam1108 and LTLakerFan like this.
  10. Jaguar

    Jaguar - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    May 26, 2016
    Messages:
    1,926
    Likes Received:
    3,474
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Offline
    That actually kicks in when he has to start paying child support.
     
    Barnstable, Juronimo and LTLakerFan like this.
  11. LTLakerFan

    LTLakerFan - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    34,633
    Likes Received:
    58,138
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    So Cal
    Offline
    What did he hurt how badly?
     
  12. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    25,703
    Likes Received:
    69,919
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    ok, for ariza and eric gordon and junk. who cares? point is, my scenario is totally possible and more probably than joining our 28-win outfit without another star (or really, two, given lebron's MO). i think it's crazy that everyone in the media is overlooking houston as the obvious landing spot here, especially given their morey love. he probably told them to shut up about it lest they screw it up like we did the paul george situation.
     
  13. KuzmoBall17

    KuzmoBall17 - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2017
    Messages:
    1,960
    Likes Received:
    3,664
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    CLEVELAND, Ohio -- Cavs center Tristan Thompson suffered a non-contact injury to his left leg late in the second quarter against the Indiana Pacers Wednesday and was removed from the game with 1:41 remaining.

    The Cavs called it a left calf strain and he did not return against the Pacers.
     
  14. Lakers2015

    Lakers2015 - Lakers Starter -

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2015
    Messages:
    3,634
    Likes Received:
    6,103
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    28 win outfit? Lol wasn’t aware the season is over.

    Also how exactly did the Lakers screw up the Paul George situation? The Pacers clearly wanted no part of trading him to L.A.

    As for Houston don’t really see the allure either. Chris Paul is clearly on the downside of his career and can’t stay healthy. Harden is really good, but if he and Chris Paul couldn’t mesh why would LeBron & Harden? I just don’t see what’s so appealing for LeBron not to mention there isn’t the marketing opportunities he’d have in Hollywood.
     
  15. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I don't see is more probable than the Lakers at all. It's somewhat plausible, but the Lakers can make it easier to the two max deals than the Rockets forcing a trade anyway. There's no combination of salaries that would work that didn't include Ryan Anderson and if that were the case, why not force a trade to the Lakers? I'd rather have Deng/Clarkson/Randle/Zubac maybe than whatever Houston has to realistically offer. In that case, the Lakers would be in the same position again as Houston except with 40 million dollars to spend and still a collection of great young assets. That would mean you could easily add Cousins if you have to or George if you want to.
     
    wallangong likes this.
  16. wallangong

    wallangong - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    1,505
    Likes Received:
    4,540
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    THIS. One can't simply dismiss the fact that the Rockets don't have a good package to put together. Even Capela doesn't make much sense if they already have Love and Thompson, but no wing players to stick around and feed the ball to Clint. Maybe the Rockets are a dark horse, but it would require the Cavs accepting a VERY questionable package unless a mystery 3rd team gets involved.
     
  17. vasashi17

    vasashi17 LB's Resident Capologist

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    6,591
    Likes Received:
    20,201
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I still think LaBron and his ego won't allow a trade involving himself, cause that is just another white flag as part of his lllllegacy. MJ and Kobe never got traded, so he won't be part of that narrative. However, I do see it more likely that we can pull off a Cousins or PG13 trade if it really gets disgustingly bad in NO or OKC. On top of that, Boogie and George have cap hits towards 2018 that are much more team friendly than LaBron's $35M cap hold. And, since both George and Cuz are younger, with a trade, we also acquire their bird rights which will be much easier to manipulate so that they can get paid on the back end of their contracts, if they sacrifice a bit in year 1 of their deals.

    Oh and btw, can the year just end with us at 41-41, pushing the Warriors to game 7 in round 1 before bowing out and LaBron and PG/Cuz ready to join the fray already?

     
    sirronstuff and therealdeal like this.
  18. vasashi17

    vasashi17 LB's Resident Capologist

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    6,591
    Likes Received:
    20,201
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    LaBron's business partner acting real extra in this interview. I'm sure most of the non-Bron contingent will take this as the final death blow to squash all LaBron to LA talks. I personally see it as damage control for Bronnie including Zo in 2 of his last 3 tweets, all while his Cavs are in free fall. Also this gives Bron's camp some leverage so that it's not automatically assumed LA has him in the bag.

    I believe it's also an indirect message to Magic/Rob/Jeanie. Do what needs to be done to get LA in a winning state of mind. Don't rest on your laurels (ie Deng is still on the books). LA is the only suitor that will allow LaBron to pair up with any free agent of his choosing. But in order to compete we may need to look at trying to acquire a 3rd star (if our roster does not already have one by season's end.) I think Zo and Kuz are safe...but Ingram could be on the block if a 3rd star is interested in joining a bron-??? tandem. Its a good thing Magic has already placed the "untouchable" tag on BI cause it gains us leverage if it ever comes to that scenario.

     
  19. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    25,703
    Likes Received:
    69,919
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    32 wins? would it really make a difference? we're not sniffing the playoffs.

    1. we don't actually know that.
    2. if we did, it was because we tampered in such an obvious way that it pissed them off.

    in either case, better management might have led to us having a star in place (maybe two, as i think we could have made a play for paul had we gotten george).

    yeah, lebron's hurting for marketing opportunities.

    houston can move anderson in a separate deal that breaks his salary up, then add one of those pieces if necessary.

    and again, you're acting as if there would be bidding. there would be no bidding. just like the chris paul scenario. paul said "trade me to houston or i opt out and go elsewhere". the clips didn't get shop paul, so it didn't matter what they wanted. they chose something over nothing. houston can offer something again.

    again, in the scenario i've outlined, cleveland will have two choices: lebron walks for nothing (to la, most probably, which would REALLY piss gilbert off) or they get eric gordon and a late first rounder, plus some salary ballast.

    the only thing i don't know is whether bron's opt-in timing allows for a paul situation. i bet it does, but not all do (some have to be decided at times that would preclude such a trade demand).

    finally, for everyone doubting this, imagine all of the counterarguments you could have devised if at this time last year, someone told you houston was going to get chris paul.
     
  20. therealdeal

    therealdeal Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    28,475
    Likes Received:
    62,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    If Houston could find a buyer for Ryan Anderson they would have already. They were trying to for Melo and nobody would help. I don't think that changes for LeBron.

    It's a plausible scenario, but your opinion that it's more likely than the Lakers or even a probability is where I just completely disagree.
     

Share This Page